User Controls

i cant believe what just happened im so totally fucked

  1. Speedy Parker Black Hole
    Originally posted by GAAAAALM

    Just because you're dried up and old doesn't mean I am. Already aborted the mission once last year.

    As you should have
  2. HTS highlight reel
    Originally posted by gadzooks You either:
    * Posited some hypothetical scenario in which you kiss an 8 year old and tried to troll us as a result

    ngl the description of making out with a 8 year old set off a lot of red flags for me (just like the way it was written), so whether he was trolling or not I'm still inclined to believe he has some nonce-y tendencies himself.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  3. Speedy Parker Black Hole
    Originally posted by HTS ngl the description of making out with a 8 year old set off a lot of red flags for me (just like the way it was written), so whether he was trolling or not I'm still inclined to believe he has some nonce-y tendencies himself.

    Takes one to know one
  4. Narc Naturally Camouflaged [connect my yokel-like scolytidae]
    Originally posted by gadzooks I came to your defense over a pretty egregious act.

    Now you're playing the "no u" card to everyone.

    Maybe understandably so…

    You either:
    * Posited some hypothetical scenario in which you kiss an 8 year old and tried to troll us as a result, OR,

    * you actually kissed an 8 year old, and tried to troll us as a result.

    And I went and put myself out there in your defense.

    Either way, normal people don't make entire threads about kissing 8 year olds.

    Either you did it, or you thought about it in some capacity.

    I could forgive either of those in and of themselves, but instead you chose to drop UNO cards and call everyone else a "nonce".

    That's some ignorant bitch shit.

    there's way more possible scenarios than just those two. lol


    .
  5. GAAAAALM African Astronaut
    Originally posted by Narc there's way more possible scenarios than just those two. lol


    .

    And I'm sure you've thought of all of them.
  6. Narc Naturally Camouflaged [connect my yokel-like scolytidae]
    lol


    .
  7. Originally posted by GAAAAALM When they're at the beach or pool, sure. I wouldn't let my kids dress like that but whatever.

    When you're gawking at them online while they're purposely showing ass… No. You should fucking hang yourself. Cute girls play with dolls and run on playgrounds. They don't model in skimpy ass clothes. I feel bad for those kids

    o, i get it what your sooooo triggered.

    i didnt meant to discriminate against you.

    here.







  8. Wariat Marine/Preteen Biologist
    Making out with an 8 yr old is exactly what Josph Roisman would do any chance he would be given alone with such a child. This is a horrible human being who Ive had the displeasure of meeting in a county jail lockup and indeed he is one demented human being:
    http://templeoftcap.freeforums.net/thread/5621/joseph-roisman-best-defence
  9. Grylls Cum Looking Faggot [abrade this vocal tread-softly]
    what the fuck is wrong with you people

    smfh
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  10. GAAAAALM African Astronaut
    Lanny should remove CP
  11. the man who put it in my hood Black Hole [miraculously counterclaim my golf]
    Flabby ripples
  12. mmQ Lisa Turtle
    Flappy ribbles

    That's not really child porn right? That picture up there.
  13. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by mmQ That's not really child porn right? That picture up there.

    It's unlawful to post pics of children in these kinds of settings without permission from the legal guardians.
  14. Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country Dark Matter [my scoffingly uncritical tinning]
    Originally posted by mmQ Flappy ribbles

    That's not really child porn right? That picture up there.

    It depends in part on context too. For instance posting these pics in a clothing catalogue might be legit.

    Here on the other hand...
  15. Ghost Black Hole
    Originally posted by mmQ Flappy ribbles

    That's not really child porn right? That picture up there.

    no, that would be child modelling which like I said before is perfectly legal.

    Is it so hard to believe there are people out there that look at semi nude young girls and boys in a non sexual way? god.. get your head out of the gutters
  16. Originally posted by Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country It depends in part on context too. For instance posting these pics in a clothing catalogue might be legit.

    Here on the other hand…

    no, there are only two types of people who would have problems with these images of children in beach atire.

    1 - moose leems.

    2 - closeted pedos in denials.
  17. Ajax African Astronaut [rumor the placative aphakia]
    Originally posted by -SpectraL It's unlawful to post pics of children in these kinds of settings without permission from the legal guardians.

    For argument’s sake, please cite the law.

    Also, these kids appear to be “models,” so the copyright is likely held by the photographer or agency.
  18. bigthink victim of incest
    Originally posted by Narc there's way more possible scenarios than just those two. lol


    .

    "some say she's eight.

    but I say she's an 8."

    narc probably
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  19. Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country Dark Matter [my scoffingly uncritical tinning]
    Originally posted by Ajax For argument’s sake, please cite the law.

    The state's highest court ruled today that a photographer who took nude pictures of the actress-model Brooke Shields when she was 10 years old could continue to market the photos as long as he did not sell them to pornographic publications.

    In a 4-to-3 decision, the Court of Appeals said the 17-year-old Miss Shields could not break a contract signed in 1975 by her mother, Teri Shields, which allowed a New York City photographer, Garry Gross, to take the pictures.
    https://www.nytimes.com/1983/03/30/nyregion/brooke-shields-loses-court-case.html

    Case law/precedent is a valid source of law.

    BTW, since it's me, care to guess the ethnicity of the photographer?

    6 million shekels to the 6 millionth correct answer.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  20. Big League Jew Tuskegee Airman
    Faggots
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
Jump to Top