User Controls
The Impeachment Inquiry has Begun
-
2019-09-26 at 11:42 PM UTC
Originally posted by 8stringflinG Lol have you seen their awards. Every single one is a publication of integrity.
BUT SURE, ITS FAKE NEWS.
Did they win the award for the Russian hoax they pushed 24 hours a day seven days a week for two and a half years, or did they win it for WMD hoax in Iraq that got thousands killed? -
2019-09-26 at 11:46 PM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL Did they win the award for the Russian hoax they pushed 24 hours a day seven days a week for two and a half years, or did they win it for WMD hoax in Iraq that got thousands killed?
Yawn. Try using FACTS next time old man.
Oh, sorry i forgot. Reality has a liberal bias ;) -
2019-09-26 at 11:49 PM UTC
Originally posted by 8stringflinG Yawn. Try using FACTS next time old man.
Oh, sorry i forgot. Reality has a liberal bias ;)
What's ironic is they even gave these fake news arseholes a Pulitzer for their Russian hoax story. And they didn't even have the honor or the integrity to send it back after they were proved to be a pack of chronic liars. Total scum with zero credibility. -
2019-09-26 at 11:52 PM UTCSpectraL, don't you ever get tired of owning the kidiots? It's not like it is a challenge at all...
-
2019-09-26 at 11:54 PM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL What's ironic is they even gave these fake news arseholes a Pulitzer for their Russian hoax story. And they didn't even have the honor or the integrity to send it back after they were proved to be a pack of chronic liars. Total scum with zero credibility.
You have zero sources. Doubleyawn. -
2019-09-27 at 12:03 AM UTC
Originally posted by Kuntzschutz SpectraL, don't you ever get tired of owning the kidiots? It's not like it is a challenge at all…
I don't really consider them kidiots. Kidiots post nonsensical and worthless garbage, whereas they actually use words and form sentences. It's a big step up from the old days actually. -
2019-09-27 at 12:05 AM UTC
-
2019-09-27 at 12:13 AM UTC
Originally posted by 8stringflinG You have yet to post a single source to back a single claim
"In the case of much of the Pulitzer-winning Trump-Russia work, anonymous sources were used with insufficient skepticism and a lack of caveats in the service of a credulous and disingenuous journalism of innuendo. The journalistic failures these articles reflect would be problematic even if Special Counsel Robert Mueller had made a case for collusion. His findings just make them all the more obvious. "
https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2019/04/09/why_last_years_trump-russia_pulitzer_was_no_prize.html -
2019-09-27 at 12:30 AM UTCAnother right wing source lol. My fucking god you righties are a joke.
-
2019-09-27 at 12:52 AM UTC
-
2019-09-27 at 12:53 AM UTC
-
2019-09-27 at 12:56 AM UTC
-
2019-09-27 at 1:10 AM UTC
Originally posted by aldra what is incorrect about it though
Mainly the part where it has nothing to do with what i was talking about. Completely irrelevant and just another deflection. I don't know why SpectraL started talking about this instead of the information on fact checker that's actually relevant to this thread. I was simply pointing out how they are unbiased and an education based organization, unlike parker's link to a right wing think tank opinion piece. -
2019-09-27 at 1:11 AM UTC
-
2019-09-27 at 1:11 AM UTCNext: We talk about Hilary Clinton
-
2019-09-27 at 1:12 AM UTCneither is unbiased, though I'd doubt any outlet even honestly tries to be
-
2019-09-27 at 1:12 AM UTCI don't wanna
-
2019-09-27 at 1:22 AM UTC
-
2019-09-27 at 1:30 AM UTC
-
2019-09-27 at 1:51 AM UTC