User Controls
Ok, I’m gonna spill the beans....
-
2019-08-14 at 1:14 AM UTC
-
2019-08-14 at 1:16 AM UTC
-
2019-08-14 at 1:19 AM UTC
-
2019-08-14 at 1:19 AM UTC
-
2019-08-14 at 1:22 AM UTCI sure do. Didn’t know it existed till I saw my plastic surgeon.
-
2019-08-14 at 1:39 AM UTC
Originally posted by Technologist Correct, well most at least.
My cancer was contained in one breast. I had it removed. Now I get a chest expander put in. It has a port and they will inject it with saline till it stretches the skin enough to accommodate my implant, then the implant will be inserted. He will also lift the other breast to match up with the new one. Andddddd, that’s how it works for me. No chemotherapy and no radiation treatments since it was contained.
Then I’ll be back to myself with new perkier boobies 😁
Have em both cut off and save on bras -
2019-08-14 at 1:48 AM UTC
Originally posted by stl1 My theory is that breast cancer develops from a lack of sunlight.
Ladies, you know what to do!
women were naturally designed to have lots of babies and to breast feed them. modern womens boobs don't get suckled on regularly like they used to and as a result breast cancer rates have risen. women need to find a way to have those boobs suckled on more regularly, they need to find some substitutes for all those hungry baby mouths that are no longer available to them.
so peeps if you see women pass the word on quick.
. -
2019-08-14 at 1:49 AM UTC
Originally posted by Narc women were naturally designed to have lots of babies and to breast feed them. modern womens boobs don't get suckled on regularly like they used to and as a result breast cancer rates have risen. women need to find a way to have those boobs suckled on more regularly, they need to find some substitutes for all those hungry baby mouths that are no longer available to them.
so peeps if you see women pass the word on quick.
.
Yeah... Not how that works. -
2019-08-14 at 1:54 AM UTC
-
2019-08-14 at 1:54 AM UTC
-
2019-08-14 at 1:58 AM UTC
Originally posted by Narc women were naturally designed to have lots of babies and to breast feed them. modern womens boobs don't get suckled on regularly like they used to and as a result breast cancer rates have risen. women need to find a way to have those boobs suckled on more regularly, they need to find some substitutes for all those hungry baby mouths that are no longer available to them.
so peeps if you see women pass the word on quick.
.
I would gladly volunteer my time. -
2019-08-14 at 2 AM UTCI saw someone say before that not breastfeeding caused breast CA. Wrong. I breast fed my son.
Narc not sure if that’s what you’re saying, or if you’re being your usual sarcastic self. -
2019-08-14 at 2:07 AM UTC
Originally posted by Technologist I saw someone say before that not breastfeeding caused breast CA. Wrong. I breast fed my son.
Narc not sure if that’s what you’re saying, or if you’re being your usual sarcastic self.
i don't know how clearer i could have put it. not having as many babies in the modern world as women were designed to have, means less babies suckling on those titties which is less stimulation which is what used to keep cancer at bay. just having one baby doesn't cut it, hense why you now a titless old bag. i'm guessing your brains were in your tits an all.
. -
2019-08-14 at 2:10 AM UTCSTFU Narc,
I was giving you the benefit of the doubt, so you wouldn’t look so stupid, but you done that all in your own.
Continue your ignorance’ -
2019-08-14 at 5 AM UTCThe whole thing he's talking about is women who don't breastfeed being at higher risk for cancer because their milk ducts never milk.
Sucking on random non milk filled titties wouldn't do anything to reduce cancer risk.
Joke could've worked if he suggested knocking women up THEN sucking on their titties. Instead he just looks like a dumbass who belongs on r/badwomensanatomy -
2019-08-14 at 6:19 AM UTCShow me your breast cancer.
-
2019-08-14 at 10:48 AM UTC
-
2019-08-14 at 10:50 AM UTC
-
2019-08-14 at 10:53 AM UTC
-
2019-08-14 at 10:55 AM UTC