User Controls
Boris Johnson Prime Minister
-
2019-08-06 at 11:18 AM UTC
-
2019-08-06 at 11:33 AM UTC
Originally posted by Common De-mominator Shooting yourself in the foot only sounds like survival instincts to one type of person.: plain retards.
liberating yourselves and claiming independence isnt shooting own foot. only a basement dwelling incel would call that shooting themselves in the foot.Only if there is an imminent potential for harm from them, otherwise it's just unnecessary surgery that causes trauma without a reason.
are you a doctor ?Holy shit, is your China brain defective, learn to read, that text around the quote is literally addressing this: there is no need to now, there is no free Somali immigration law happening. If there was, they could leave. But there isn't. So leaving is retarded.
you dumb illiterate inbred shítskin fucking paki.
BREXIT WAS DECIDED 2 YEARS+ AGO.
thats just how long a 'walk out' takes.
if they waited until the EU start making such laws then wouldnt be able to leave in time before the ratification.I am trying to spell it out for you but I now realize that doesn't exist in China.
ask §m£ÂgØL. he knew pinyins.Everything seems rational from an irrational perspective, that doesn't make it rational or worthwhile.
thats moot point. rational and irrational are subjective, like morality.So far all you've done is prove that the UK had zero good reason to leave the EU.
the point is that this isnt about good or ungood reason to do such and such.
its all about the freedom and rights to self-determination.
it could be argued that its more rational and benificial for the palestinians to be a part of israel since most of them are working in israel and consuming isralean utilities anyway.
but they dont and wont. -
2019-08-06 at 1:31 PM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny liberating yourselves and claiming independence isnt shooting own foot. only a basement dwelling incel would call that shooting themselves in the foot.
Exiting your most important and beneficial economic partnership with no fucking plan for zero reason is not "liberating yourself", it is shooting yourself in the foot.are you a doctor ?
If there is any specific criteria required to be met for anything, that means there is also a condition of not meeting those criteria.
I.e. if there is such a thing as necessary surgery, there is also such s thing as unnecessary surgery.you dumb illiterate inbred shítskin fucking paki.
BREXIT WAS DECIDED 2 YEARS+ AGO.
thats just how long a 'walk out' takes.
if they waited until the EU start making such laws then wouldnt be able to leave in time before the ratification.
No you fuck brain. It only takes 2 years if you say "we are gonna exit the EU but renegotiate the same deals... Oh wait we are fucking retarded, why the fuck would anyone give us the same deal now that we unilaterally gave up our bargaining position for no reason".
The reason it took 2 years is because Article 50 requires parliamentary approval. because half their nation correctly identified the fact that Britain getting a better deal out of Brexit was literally never gonna happen and it was an idiotic idea, and fought it in their own parliament
That's not related to the EU at all, it is their legislative system trying to work as intended with one side of the aisle trying to unretard the other.thats moot point. rational and irrational are subjective, like morality.
2+2=4 no matter what, and the NHS will see a net negative budget shift, both are maths.the point is that this isnt about good or ungood reason to do such and such.
its all about the freedom and rights to self-determination.
It is literally utterly unrelated to freedom. Britain does not gain any extra degrees of freedom from leaving the EU. It has always had the ability to leave, that will always be the case, using that ability doesn't suddenly make you freer. It's like saying you should sell a $100 prepaid credit card for $50 cash because you don't need to abide by the vendor's terms of service to use cash... Ok but wait, did you actually have a problem with the TOS? No, but you don't like that they could change the TOS... You know that if they changed the TOS, you can disagree and leave right? And you can sell it any time, for example if you really needed money but there was no CC reader.
It wouldn't be idiotic if you really needed to sell the card because its TOS was restricting you from using the money, but it's not, so the potential that they could update their TOS is an idiotic reason to lose $50.it could be argued that its more rational and benificial for the palestinians to be a part of israel since most of them are working in israel and consuming isralean utilities anyway.
but they dont and wont.
You are free to be irrational, but don't fucking lie and alter history as if this was the British people striking out for freedom at all costs: you do by definition need to keep consistent with your goals, and if your Chinese memory is working there were plenty of economic promises made about Brexit that they straight up lied about and was a gigantic impetus of the leave campaign
-
2019-08-06 at 6:07 PM UTC
Originally posted by Common De-mominator Exiting your most important and beneficial economic partnership with no fucking plan for zero reason is not "liberating yourself", it is shooting yourself in the foot.
not when the the cost of membership outweights the benefits. again, this is subjective. some people prefer money while others prefer racial purity.If there is any specific criteria required to be met for anything, that means there is also a condition of not meeting those criteria.
most criteria comes as a range, not as a fixed value.I.e. if there is such a thing as necessary surgery, there is also such s thing as unnecessary surgery.
again, this is subjective. some say chealsea mannings sex change surgery is a necessity, others disagree.No you fuck brain. It only takes 2 years if you say "we are gonna exit the EU but renegotiate the same deals… Oh wait we are fucking retarded, why the fuck would anyone give us the same deal now that we unilaterally gave up our bargaining position for no reason".
The reason it took 2 years is because Article 50 requires parliamentary approval. because half their nation correctly identified the fact that Britain getting a better deal out of Brexit was literally never gonna happen and it was an idiotic idea, and fought it in their own parliament
That's not related to the EU at all, it is their legislative system trying to work as intended with one side of the aisle trying to unretard the other.
irregardless. this is the process that they had to follow whether they wanted a hard or a soft brexit. if they wanted out in 2016 and they arent out by 2019, then if they wanted out in 2023 they wont be out by 2025, or if they wanted out in 2113 they wont be out by 2117.
the longer they stay in eu the deeper will the tentacles of the eu be entrenched in them and the longer it will take for the uk to break off.2+2=4 no matter what, and the NHS will see a net negative budget shift, both are maths.
if its as simple as this there wouldnt be so much fuss. stupid paki.It is literally utterly unrelated to freedom. Britain does not gain any extra degrees of freedom from leaving the EU. It has always had the ability to leave, that will always be the case, using that ability doesn't suddenly make you freer. It's like saying you should sell a $100 prepaid credit card for $50 cash because you don't need to abide by the vendor's terms of service to use cash… Ok but wait, did you actually have a problem with the TOS? No, but you don't like that they could change the TOS… You know that if they changed the TOS, you can disagree and leave right? And you can sell it any time, for example if you really needed money but there was no CC reader.
It wouldn't be idiotic if you really needed to sell the card because its TOS was restricting you from using the money, but it's not, so the potential that they could update their TOS is an idiotic reason to lose $50.
you sucks at analogizing. try again.You are free to be irrational, but don't fucking lie and alter history as if this was the British people striking out for freedom at all costs: you do by definition need to keep consistent with your goals, and if your Chinese memory is working there were plenty of economic promises made about Brexit that they straight up lied about and was a gigantic impetus of the leave campaign
of course politicians lie. but it doesnt change the fact that uk will be better off and freeer as a country if it breaks off from eu.
the true benefits of brexit is just too complicated for normies and sheeples to understd or short enough to be painted on the sides of doubledecker busses, but this doesnt mean there arent any benefits to be gained.
eu is nothinng but an extension of the 3rd reich and the schengen area is nothing but the extension of the libensraum that hitler had envisioned. -
2019-08-06 at 6:38 PM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny not when the the cost of membership outweights the benefits. again, this is subjective. some people prefer money while others prefer racial purity.
Racial purity isn't part of it otherwise they wouldn't be importing pakis and indoinsmost criteria comes as a range, not as a fixed value.
You either need your wisdom teeth removed or you don't, it's not a spectrum of wisdom tooth keepingness.again, this is subjective. some say chealsea mannings sex change surgery is a necessity, others disagree.
This is more the equivalent of cutting your own balls with a cleaver against medical instructions.irregardless. this is the process that they had to follow whether they wanted a hard or a soft brexit. if they wanted out in 2016 and they arent out by 2019, then if they wanted out in 2023 they wont be out by 2025, or if they wanted out in 2113 they wont be out by 2117.
Not really. Half the country fought it because again, it is an utterly retarded move akin to chopping the country's own healthy balls off. If they were actually any threat to their sovereignty or security or economic well being, there would be no reason to fight the exit. The reason people flight for two years is because the threat to their economic well being is in fact Brexit.the longer they stay in eu the deeper will the tentacles of the eu be entrenched in them and the longer it will take for the uk to break off.
I.e. The economic benefits will be so great that their countrymen will fight them on leaving it for no fucking reason.if its as simple as this there wouldnt be so much fuss. stupid paki.
It literally was that simple. The Brexit campaign literally lied to the public and people genuinely polled as voting leave for the sake of the NHS, so they got duped.you sucks at analogizing. try again.
The analogy was fine. More economic power with harmless vendor TOS vs less economic power with government TOS.of course politicians lie. but it doesnt change the fact that uk will be better off and freeer as a country if it breaks off from eu.
the true benefits of brexit is just too complicated for normies and sheeples to understd or short enough to be painted on the sides of doubledecker busses, but this doesnt mean there arent any benefits to be gained.
eu is nothinng but an extension of the 3rd reich and the schengen area is nothing but the extension of the libensraum that hitler had envisioned.
Better how, freer how? The main freedom they will receive is the freedom to negotiate their own trade deals... Worse. They have less leverage, they left a great union, but their country is still parked right next to Europe and they still have to trade with them, court their tourists, offer them services, all of which they will categorically do worse at and impeded in terms of.
The subsequent economic impact will only be negative. The individual UK citizen will have less money in their pocket and be able to do less things with it... Less free, definitely a lot worse too. -
2019-08-06 at 7:10 PM UTC
Originally posted by Common De-mominator Racial purity isn't part of it otherwise they wouldn't be importing pakis and indoins
and hence almost half of them rejected brexit and slightly more than half approve of it.You either need your wisdom teeth removed or you don't, it's not a spectrum of wisdom tooth keepingness.
yes but the criteria at which that is decided is based on a range of conditions. not a specific set of circumstamces.This is more the equivalent of cutting your own balls with a cleaver against medical instructions.
accordimg to who ? you ? her ? experts ?Not really. Half the country fought it because again, it is an utterly retarded move akin to chopping the country's own healthy balls off. If they were actually any threat to their sovereignty or security or economic well being, there would be no reason to fight the exit. The reason people flight for two years is because the threat to their economic well being is in fact Brexit.
yea, because half of the country are coal burners, nigger lovers, race traitors, degenarates, druggies, narcs, but irregardless, the other half won and thats all that matters.I.e. The economic benefits will be so great that their countrymen will fight them on leaving it for no fucking reason.
whats good for the economy isnt necessarily good for the people.It literally was that simple. The Brexit campaign literally lied to the public and people genuinely polled as voting leave for the sake of the NHS, so they got duped.
nhs is just part of the reasons.The analogy was fine. More economic power with harmless vendor TOS vs less economic power with government TOS.
i have no idea what your tryimg to say.Better how, freer how? The main freedom they will receive is the freedom to negotiate their own trade deals… Worse. They have less leverage, they left a great union, but their country is still parked right next to Europe and they still have to trade with them, court their tourists, offer them services, all of which they will categorically do worse at and impeded in terms of.
The subsequent economic impact will only be negative. The individual UK citizen will have less money in their pocket and be able to do less things with it… Less free, definitely a lot worse too.
first of all they stopped needing to answer to brussels.
then they are free to pursue their own economic policies.
then everything follows. -
2019-08-06 at 8 PM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny and hence almost half of them rejected brexit and slightly more than half approve of it.
yes but the criteria at which that is decided is based on a range of conditions. not a specific set of circumstamces.
accordimg to who ? you ? her ? experts ?
yea, because half of the country are coal burners, nigger lovers, race traitors, degenarates, druggies, narcs, but irregardless, the other half won and thats all that matters.
whats good for the economy isnt necessarily good for the people.
nhs is just part of the reasons.
i have no idea what your tryimg to say.
first of all they stopped needing to answer to brussels.
then they are free to pursue their own economic policies.
then everything follows.
You're retarded. I'm not gonna make another pointless multiquote when you are gonna bounce back to the same shit.
Up next "Wow name-calling and won't continue guess I won the argument" -
2019-08-07 at 9:14 AM UTCi gonna feelling people gonna be complaining when their cheap package holiday to the costa del sol now costs 3 times as much and involves getting visas and shit.
lol
. -
2019-08-07 at 3:06 PM UTCIt's considered politically correct to use the term "whyte terrorist" but if the was black Terry in the news they would never call him a "black terrorist"
-
2019-08-07 at 3:38 PM UTCniggoristThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2019-08-07 at 4:18 PM UTCimagine being so scared of the brown people you used to enslave you cuck yourself into a corner and throw all your money and potential for growth away just for spite
-
2019-08-07 at 4:19 PM UTC
-
2019-08-07 at 4:21 PM UTC
-
2019-08-07 at 4:22 PM UTC
-
2019-08-07 at 6:14 PM UTC
-
2019-08-07 at 6:23 PM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny no it wont.
this is because despite the brexit the law of supply and demand remains the same.
thus entry barriers means europe will have to go anywhere for the pretty much nothing it imports from the UK.
I really don't believe there is anyone who genuinely thinks Brexit was a good idea who wasn't blinded by xenophobia. It's going to have a terrible, lasting effect and anyone can see this -
2019-08-07 at 6:53 PM UTC
Originally posted by CAPTAIN 'I CAN NOT GOOGLE' PAKI ~snipped~
https://fullfact.org/europe/our-eu-membership-fee-55-million/
https://theconversation.com/fact-check-how-much-does-the-uk-actually-pay-to-the-eu-58120 -
2019-08-07 at 6:55 PM UTC
Originally posted by Sudo thus entry barriers means europe will have to go anywhere for the pretty much nothing it imports from the UK.
I really don't believe there is anyone who genuinely thinks Brexit was a good idea who wasn't blinded by xenophobia. It's going to have a terrible, lasting effect and anyone can see this
depends on what you define as 'good'. -
2019-08-07 at 10:20 PM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny https://fullfact.org/europe/our-eu-membership-fee-55-million/
https://theconversation.com/fact-check-how-much-does-the-uk-actually-pay-to-the-eu-58120
Nigger why are you trying to make a shitty economic argument now when you already abandoned it? -
2019-08-08 at 7:42 AM UTC
Originally posted by Common De-mominator Nigger why are you trying to make a shitty economic argument now when you already abandoned it?
holly sheet. i just realize which character your trying to play.
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt8425058/
nice troll. you got me.
