Originally posted by Common De-mominator
Pulse guy was an actual homosexual tho
it's been a while (and autopsies showing how many were killed by Omar vs. how many were killed by incompetent police still haven't been released, lol) but I remember thinking at the time that the whole gay angle seemed like it was manufactured to discredit any political motive behind the attack
False flag attacks are a fact of the human condition. All governments have in history have used them to one degree or another. Once you accept that fact things make more sense in time.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by Speedy Parker
False flag attacks are a fact of the human condition. All governments have in history have used them to one degree or another. Once you accept that fact things make more sense in time.
the problem is it's not viable (especially statistically speaking) to assume all of these attacks are 'false flags', which many people do with very little evidence to show for it
Originally posted by aldra
the problem is it's not viable (especially statistically speaking) to assume all of these attacks are 'false flags', which many people do with very little evidence to show for it
Originally posted by aldra
it's been a while (and autopsies showing how many were killed by Omar vs. how many were killed by incompetent police still haven't been released, lol) but I remember thinking at the time that the whole gay angle seemed like it was manufactured to discredit any political motive behind the attack
They tried but he was also actually a victim of cock hunger. He also did it for political reasons... Kinda.
Basically he was gay and hated himself so he sought ISIS and shot up a club to have Allah senpai love him again..
Originally posted by G4LM
It is a conspiracy. Have ANY of these shootings actually been objectively proven to be false flags? I'm not talking about what the media portrays.
No amount of direct, hard evidence will convince a willful, determined idiot.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Here's some direct, indisputable proof of a false flag that only an idiot would argue. The Parland shooting. Nikolas Cruz.
Video provided by police shows a man they say is Cruz wearing a blue hat and a jacket.
But a reliable eyewitness, a teacher, 20 feet away from the shooter, testified the shooter was wearing full metal garb, helmet, body armor, with full face shield. That means there WAS at least TWO shooters, and one of them was an FBI or SWAT shooter.
Originally posted by G4LM
Right, because eyewitness reports describing the perpetrators are so reliable.
She knows what she saw, and she can be believed. She has credibility. You a determined, willful, leftist idiot. No amount of evidence would satisfy your kind. Nobody would be credible enough for your denialist ilk, and that's a fact.
Originally posted by -SpectraL
She knows what she saw, and she can be believed. She has credibility. You a determined, willful, leftist idiot. No amount of evidence would satisfy your kind. Nobody would be credible enough for your denialist ilk, and that's a fact.
And one of the videos I posted is over 3 minutes, and the other one is over 1 minute, and yet you cried foul only two minutes after I posted them. That means you never even watched the videos and just ran straight to posting your mindless, scripted bullshit. Just get off the Internet, dude. You're really stinking up the place with your attention-whoring antics.
Originally posted by G4LM
I don't need to watch them to smell your bullshit.
Like I said, you're just one of those mindless leftist twits reading your mindless little scripts. There's no amount of evidence which would satisfy your ilk. You're a disgrace, kid. Clean yourself up.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
