User Controls
Dallas police suffocate mentally ill man by accident
-
2019-08-03 at 3 PM UTC
-
2019-08-03 at 3:05 PM UTC
-
2019-08-03 at 3:52 PM UTCI don't negotiate with retards.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2019-08-03 at 3:54 PM UTC
-
2019-08-03 at 4:08 PM UTC
-
2019-08-03 at 5:44 PM UTC
-
2019-08-03 at 5:53 PM UTC
-
2019-08-03 at 5:56 PM UTC
-
2019-08-03 at 8:34 PM UTCSo now you guys support cops too? And lying or perjury cops?
-
2019-08-03 at 10:02 PM UTC
-
2019-08-04 at 1:16 AM UTC"Accident". People have no clue that police departments do not hire people with high or even average IQs. To be a police officer, you have to have a low IQ or you don't get hired. They only take low IQs, because they've found that smart people take the job just to get it on their resume, and then after costly training they move on to another field of work. They've even admitted as such. All applicants are given an IQ test, and if the score is anything above below-average IQ, they don't get the job. Every police force in the country consists entirely of low IQ morons, by design.
A US court even had to rule on the practice, and decided that since all applicants were subjected to the same requirement, that they were all required to have a low IQ, then there was no discrimination, but commented that the practice is "unwise".
https://www.globalresearch.ca/us-court-ruled-you-can-be-too-smart-to-be-a-cop/5420630 -
2019-08-04 at 1:33 AM UTCLol great source there spectroll
-
2019-08-04 at 1:43 AM UTC
Originally posted by G4LM Lol great source there spectroll
Look up the case yourself.
Robert Jordan v The City of New London
https://www.thecasecentre.org/educators/products/view?id=78010 -
2019-08-04 at 1:53 AM UTCProtip: Those aren't IQ test numbers. They used a different test called the Wonderlic Personnel Test and Scholastic Level Exam
Also that was ONE guy in ONE police department in 1996 and nobody gave a shit because it turned out they were looking at specific answers on the test and not giving a fuck about a largely unimportant score. The court found their method to be based on 'rational basis'.
At first jordan thought he was beging discriminated for age since he was 46 at the time lol. He was looking for legal vengeance after not being chosen. -
2019-08-04 at 1:56 AM UTC
Originally posted by G4LM Protip: Those aren't IQ test numbers. They used a different test called the Wonderlic Personnel Test and Scholastic Level Exam
… they were looking at specific answers on the test and not giving a fuck about a largely unimportant score.
The test mentioned is an IQ test, and there were no specific answers they were looking for. -
2019-08-04 at 1:56 AM UTC
Originally posted by G4LM Protip: Those aren't IQ test numbers. They used a different test called the Wonderlic Personnel Test and Scholastic Level Exam
Also that was ONE guy in ONE police department in 1996 and nobody gave a shit because it turned out they were looking at specific answers on the test and not giving a fuck about a largely unimportant score. The court found their method to be based on 'rational basis'.
At first jordan thought he was beging discriminated for age since he was 46 at the time lol. He was looking for legal vengeance after not being chosen.
Ok, sooo.. first he doesn't exist and the source is flawed, but now it's ok, it's real, but it's one department. You see any kind of pattern developing here, kid? And if they were that fucked up even way back then, don't you think chances are they're even more fucked up today? Today, they probably require an IQ of below 100 to be an armed officer. -
2019-08-04 at 2:13 AM UTC
Originally posted by Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country The test mentioned is an IQ test, and there were no specific answers they were looking for.
Yeah, in SpectraLs link of misinformation. And yes, there were. They looked at the questions and thus that's why they only interviewed applicants with scores in the 22-27 range. Their methodology, as i said, was deemed rational by the court. It wasnt just 'you too smart' and its not even an intelligence test anyway it covers all aspects.
I mean autistic people are smart but they'd be terrible cops. And at 46? Something was off with that dude. -
2019-08-04 at 2:14 AM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL Ok, sooo.. first he doesn't exist and the source is flawed, but now it's ok, it's real, but it's one department. You see any kind of pattern developing here, kid? And if they were that fucked up even way back then, don't you think chances are they're even more fucked up today? Today, they probably require an IQ of below 100 to be an armed officer.
Don't you think
Probably
If
I see no facts in any of your posts -
2019-08-04 at 2:17 AM UTCEven the judge commented that the practice would appear to be unwise.
-
2019-08-04 at 2:19 AM UTCMaybe read the actual court case next time ey old man?
https://www.aele.org/apa/jordan-newlondon.html
