2019-07-24 at 12:59 PM UTC
Folks, If you don't believe the scientists when they say this situation is dire, And extreme changes need to be made very very soon, Why do you believe the scientists, regarding anything they say?
2019-07-24 at 1:03 PM UTC
Originally posted by WellHung
Folks, If you don't believe the scientists when they say this situation is dire, And extreme changes need to be made very very soon, Why do you believe the scientists, regarding anything they say?
I don't simply believe people just because they do a particular job. I like to do the research before accepting what they say.
That said regardless of if global warming is a natural occurrence, human caused or more likely a combination of both...the Earth will be fine and the Earth will recover. The History of Earth doesn't end with humans. 99.9% of species that have existed since life first appeared on Earth are now extinct, the passing of humans wont be notable.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2019-07-24 at 1:31 PM UTC
Speedy Parker
Black Hole
[my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
The climate changes. Man has no say in it.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2019-07-24 at 2:46 PM UTC
Originally posted by Jυicebox
Climate change is real but way over-exaggerated
Climate change is real, man made climate change is both greatly overblown and weaponized for economic gain at the same time. Lots of people getting rich off of lies and inaccuracies.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2019-07-24 at 3:08 PM UTC
aldra
JIDF Controlled Opposition
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1907.00165.pdfThe question I've never seen an answer for is that if we only have (incomplete) historical climate data for the last 3 million years (oldest ice cores we have are apparently 2.7 million years old) of a planet that's over 4 billion years old, how can we possibly model historical climate change to determine whether human activity is causing climate change
on top of natural changes?
I actually agree with a lot of the practical tenets of the 'climate change' lobby, ie. working on 'cleaner' practices, increasing efficiency and reducing waste/emissions but the dogma around it is becoming absurd and the 'climate change research' industry is a racket on par with the military industrial complex, though not at the same scale
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2019-07-24 at 3:37 PM UTC
kroz
weak whyte, frothy cuck, and former twink
idk it just comes off as a libtard scam, go watch some more tyt op
2019-07-24 at 3:49 PM UTC
of course climate change isn't a falicy. its always happened, what do you think the ice age was ffs? a hundred thousand years ago man adapted to the ice age and lived through it perfectly fine with nothing like our current level of knowledge, resources and technology.
humans are the absolute masters of surviving changes to our environment, and the animal and plant kingdoms are pretty fucking kickass at it too. we've all had a very long time to get used to making adjustments and figuring new and ingenious ways to adapt. current climate change isn't a problem that the world won't manage easily. if necessary species will evolve to manage better, just like always, so nothing to worry about. in fact the only thing we need to worry about is all the doom mongers and their dastardly plans to control us and our valuable resources.
.
