User Controls
Boris Johnson Prime Minister
-
2019-07-23 at 3:46 PM UTC
-
2019-07-23 at 3:47 PM UTCYellow Trump
-
2019-07-23 at 4:06 PM UTCLooks like he could be our Matthew's daddy.
-
2019-07-23 at 4:12 PM UTCIt's like, who wants to be the new captain of the sinking Titanic, as they all arrange the deck chairs. The Brexit Party will be taking all in the next election. It will be a total political wipeout, like no one there has ever seen before. Just watch and see. The globalists and their muppets are finished. Tick, tock...
-
2019-07-23 at 4:49 PM UTC
-
2019-07-23 at 4:53 PM UTChe sure knows how to handle the krauts
-
2019-07-23 at 4:58 PM UTCIf I were him I'd just go by "Bo Johnson"
-
2019-07-23 at 4:58 PM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL It's like, who wants to be the new captain of the sinking Titanic, as they all arrange the deck chairs. The Brexit Party will be taking all in the next election. It will be a total political wipeout, like no one there has ever seen before. Just watch and see. The globalists and their muppets are finished. Tick, tock…
not through any bullshit election process it won't.
. -
2019-07-23 at 5 PM UTC
-
2019-07-23 at 6:17 PM UTC
Originally posted by NARCassist plenty of african sea farers. egypt, south africa and algeria, among others, all have fairly decent navies. and the berbers were well known sea farers who were sailing long distances hundreds of years ago.
.
None of those areas are sub-Saharan nor were they blue water navies they were all brown water navies. Do you know the difference? Serious question.
As for South Africa really? They have 4 frigates, 3 diesel submarines, and 2 "warrior" class strike ships which are basically small coast guard ships. None of which are blue water capable due to a lack of support or logistic vessels and other limitations. In 1652 the Dutch started what became Capetown. The indigenous residents had no navy in 1652, brown or blue other than small coastal fishing vessels. Any naval presence to this day in South Africa is not due to the efforts of Africans. I am not being racists these are just historical fact. -
2019-07-23 at 6:24 PM UTCWe woz sea captains
-
2019-07-23 at 6:26 PM UTCseamen
-
2019-07-23 at 6:28 PM UTC
Originally posted by Speedy Parker None of those areas are sub-Saharan nor were they blue water navies they were all brown water navies. Do you know the difference? Serious question.
As for South Africa really? They have 4 frigates, 3 diesel submarines, and 2 "warrior" class strike ships which are basically small coast guard ships. None of which are blue water capable due to a lack of support or logistic vessels and other limitations. In 1652 the Dutch started what became Capetown. The indigenous residents had no navy in 1652, brown or blue other than small coastal fishing vessels. Any naval presence to this day in South Africa is not due to the efforts of Africans. I am not being racists these are just historical fact.
your way out is also the way in.
which is why china and the chineses, shocked by what they've seen during their expedition to africa, forbade further any further offshore explorations. -
2019-07-23 at 6:32 PM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny your way out is also the way in.
which is why china and the chineses, shocked by what they've seen during their expedition to africa, forbade further any further offshore explorations.
Which brings us to the 21st century where China still hasn't figured out how to build there own diesel powered aircraft carrier. -
2019-07-23 at 6:45 PM UTC
-
2019-07-23 at 6:48 PM UTC
-
2019-07-23 at 6:58 PM UTC
-
2019-07-23 at 7:04 PM UTC
-
2019-07-23 at 7:11 PM UTC
-
2019-07-23 at 10:58 PM UTC
Originally posted by Speedy Parker None of those areas are sub-Saharan nor were they blue water navies they were all brown water navies. Do you know the difference? Serious question.
As for South Africa really? They have 4 frigates, 3 diesel submarines, and 2 "warrior" class strike ships which are basically small coast guard ships. None of which are blue water capable due to a lack of support or logistic vessels and other limitations. In 1652 the Dutch started what became Capetown. The indigenous residents had no navy in 1652, brown or blue other than small coastal fishing vessels. Any naval presence to this day in South Africa is not due to the efforts of Africans. I am not being racists these are just historical fact.
oh suddenly its 'sub-saharan' now? that was a bit sudden out of the blue.
anyway there is a good reason why none of those countries ever really bothered to built much of a navy. and its nothing to do with intellect or abilities. they were all colonized by european countries till the middle of the 20th century so they were all protected by the royal, the french or other european navies and would be defended by them. of course this was all back when america was little more than an insignificant little ex british colony that the rest of the world had barely heard of and certainly wouldn't have had much of a navy of their own in those days, so we'll forgive your ignorance.
also i mentioned the berbers, you should look them up before claiming africans never explored the globe. besides we all originate from africa so how the fuck is that even possible you retard?
besides, name one famous american exzplorer? lol
.
.
