Space questions.

1. 2016-12-14 at 11:12 AM UTC

   #61
   

   bling bling Dark Matter
   urrrr if u maek da foil hot than back too cold adn touch it it feel coldd urr
   The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!

   • The Self Taught Man
2. 2016-12-14 at 11:12 AM UTC

   #62
   

   bling bling Dark Matter
   Einstein and Maxwell are both fraud.
   
   Time travel is impossible. NASA lied about EM drive and Solar Sail. LIGO lied about detected gravity wave. Reality is a computer simulation is a lie. Globle warming is a lie. Flat earth is a lie. BS top scientists are leading the world's science.
   
   The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!

   • The Self Taught Man
3. 2016-12-14 at 1:46 PM UTC

   #63
   

   HampTheToker African Astronaut

   Originally posted by Lanny I'm sorry to tell you this but it is in fact you who are wrong and arguing for no reason. I wish it didn't have to be this way.
   
   
   
   On the contrary, there is photographic evidence of massive bodies that do not emit light and which have sufficient mass and density to bend light that approaches them to a degree that we would expect some of the light approaching them can not escape. This, as far as I'm concerned, satisfies all the criteria for a thing being a black hole.
   
   
   
   Well they didn't become formal proofs. We do seem to have a lot of good evidence for radio waves, yes, but then we also have some good evidence for black holes. There is qualitatively nothing different about anticipating the effects produced by radio waves and black holes, both constitute evidence towards the existence of their respective phenomenon.
   
   
   
   I mean frankly your notion of "proof" is kind of comically naive but alright. We also have "proof" of black holes, that is we can anticipate their effects and observe them with a degree of accuracy and reliability. You keep yelling about how proved radio waves are but I've yet to see a reason out of you why something like observed gravitational lensing does not constitute a "proof" by the same standards.
   
   
   
   

   
   
   +1 for greatest gif
4. 2016-12-14 at 1:56 PM UTC

   #64
   

   bling bling Dark Matter
   there its a thanks buton so u dont hav to shit up threds with ur menefagoty
   The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!

   • The Self Taught Man
5. 2016-12-14 at 2:01 PM UTC

   #65
   The Self Taught Man Black Hole
   I lost IQ points reading this thread.
   The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!

   • aldra, 
   • Lanny
6. 2016-12-14 at 2:03 PM UTC

   #66
   

   HampTheToker African Astronaut

   Originally posted by bling bling there its a thanks buton so u dont hav to shit up threds with ur menefagoty

   
   ...
7. 2016-12-14 at 2:08 PM UTC

   #67
   

   HampTheToker African Astronaut

   Originally posted by bling bling there its a thanks buton so u dont hav to shit up threds with ur menefagoty

   
   http://www.space.com/34994-brightest-supernova-shredded-by-black-hole.html
8. 2016-12-14 at 3:48 PM UTC

   #68
   

   Sophie Pedophile Tech Support

   Originally posted by littleasianlady Um apparently the theory of light bending over the horizon is due to the speed of light relative to the distance of the sun. Or it could be refraction.
   
   That is also a theory that isn't proven.
   
   Lanny….
   
   You're being a tool so I'll stop being nice.
   
   You're wrong and arguing for no reason.
   
   There is no proof of black holes. There is no photographic evidence of a black hole. There is no proof, only theories, of black holes.
   
   PROOF OF RADIO WAVES:
   
   I CAN MAKE A RADIO TRANSMITTER AND A RADIO RECEIVER AND THE VARIABLES THAT DETERMINE MY ABILITY TO TRANSMIT AND RECEIVE REMAIN THE SAME. THINGS SUCH AS ANTENNA LENGTH AND COILS AND THINGS LIKE WATTS ETC.
   
   THEY WERE THEORIES THAT UNDERWENT RIGOROUS TESTING AND BECAME PROOFS. THE PIECES OF THE PUZZLE THAT MAKE UP ELECTRICITY AND RADIOS ARE SCIENTIFICALLY PROVEN AGAIN AND AGAIN. WHETHER THE DESCRIPTION OF THE FOUNDATIONS IS ACCURATE IS NOT 100%, BUT THE FACT IS THEY EXIST AND CAN BE MEASURED WITH CONSISTENT RETURNS IN A GIVEN SITUATION WITH NEGLIGIBLE VARIABLES. FOR FUCKS SAKE WE EVEN HAVE RADAR. THIS STUFF IS PROVEN BEYOND A DOUBT. I AM USING WIFI RIGHT NOW. PROOF OF CONCEPT PROOF OF FEASIBILITY. PROVEN.
   
   NOT LIKE YOUR FAGGOT BLACK HOLE.

   
   Oh yeah bro, you showed him with your all caps ragepost. Typing everything in caps makes you right. Fact.
9. 2016-12-14 at 6:54 PM UTC

   #69
   

   bling bling Dark Matter
   the electrons on your screen are connected with the electrons on your eyes right now and share their vibrating force so you can read my comment.
   all atoms are constantly vibrating due to kinetic energy carried by charged particles within.
   The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!

   • The Self Taught Man
10. 2016-12-14 at 7:03 PM UTC

    #70
    littleasianlady Houston

    Originally posted by bling bling the electrons on your screen are connected with the electrons on your eyes right now and share their vibrating force so you can read my comment.
    all atoms are constantly vibrating due to kinetic energy carried by charged particles within.

    
    Therefore I am the moon.
    
    But you're not. Just me. Only me.
11. 2016-12-15 at 3:33 AM UTC

    #71
    The Self Taught Man Black Hole

    Originally posted by bling bling the electrons on your screen are connected with the electrons on your eyes right now and share their vibrating force so you can read my comment.
    all atoms are constantly vibrating due to kinetic energy carried by charged particles within.

    
    can i summon bling