User Controls
Bloomberg putting 500 mil into (((philantropy)))
-
2019-06-14 at 7:03 AM UTCI highly doubt oil is made out of decaying dinosaurs that had to decay for millions of years... seems pretty far fetched. Like that would make it the most valuable resource yet it only cost a few dollars per gallon. like goats milk even cost more than that. lmao
-
2019-06-14 at 12:44 PM UTC
Originally posted by Bill Krozby I highly doubt oil is made out of decaying dinosaurs that had to decay for millions of years… seems pretty far fetched. Like that would make it the most valuable resource yet it only cost a few dollars per gallon. like goats milk even cost more than that. lmao
not just dinosaurs, any organic material -
2019-06-14 at 1:01 PM UTC
-
2019-06-14 at 2:15 PM UTC
-
2019-06-14 at 2:24 PM UTCI understand that. But, I think cleaning up our own backyard should come first.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2019-06-14 at 2:28 PM UTC
Originally posted by Technologist I understand that. But, I think cleaning up our own backyard should come first.
yeah, options are limited to affect international consumption anyway.
the argument is that developing countries like China release much more pollution than anywhere else, but fails to take into account that they're not at the stage where they can migrate to 'clean' technologies or that the production of such 'clean' technologies is extremely dirty on the supply end -
2019-06-15 at 11:13 AM UTC
Originally posted by aldra yeah, options are limited to affect international consumption anyway.
the argument is that developing countries like China release much more pollution than anywhere else, but fails to take into account that they're not at the stage where they can migrate to 'clean' technologies or that the production of such 'clean' technologies is extremely dirty on the supply end
and also did not account for pollutants that was relessed by developed countries during their developmental stages.
which is why i prefer undeveloped cuntries. -
2019-06-16 at 2:46 PM UTC
Originally posted by aldra yeah, options are limited to affect international consumption anyway.
the argument is that developing countries like China release much more pollution than anywhere else, but fails to take into account that they're not at the stage where they can migrate to 'clean' technologies or that the production of such 'clean' technologies is extremely dirty on the supply end
China could easily switch to nuclear if they actually wanted to. -
2019-06-16 at 2:53 PM UTCWhat's the point? Coal works fine.
I had coal plants all the way into the 2020's with full power production and an industial zone and waterpark in every city with max resources every turn. Once you get synthetic technocracy you don't even need power plants anymore because you get +10% power for every district.
I imagine China is doing something similar to this and simply doesn't want to spend the time and resources to switch to nuclear power even though it only takes 10 turns per city.
Also maintaining dozens of nuclear reactors is a bitchThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2019-06-16 at 3:11 PM UTC
Originally posted by Ghost What's the point? Coal works fine.
I had coal plants all the way into the 2020's with full power production and an industial zone and waterpark in every city with max resources every turn. Once you get synthetic technocracy you don't even need power plants anymore because you get +10% power for every district.
I imagine China is doing something similar to this and simply doesn't want to spend the time and resources to switch to nuclear power even though it only takes 10 turns per city.
Also maintaining dozens of nuclear reactors is a bitch
Lol what game was this in? -
2019-06-16 at 3:19 PM UTC
-
2019-06-16 at 3:25 PM UTC
-
2019-06-16 at 3:26 PM UTC
-
2019-06-16 at 4:01 PM UTC
-
2019-06-16 at 4:07 PM UTC
