User Controls
Trump's New 'Merica
-
2019-05-13 at 4:23 PM UTCIt wouldn't have made zero difference if trump or Clinton won. They'd both be following the exact same orders from the exact same people either way. How dumb people are that they don't get that.
. -
2019-05-13 at 4:28 PM UTC
Originally posted by Narc One day people are gonna realize that politicians don't do shit. Its all just a puppet show to create the illusion that people get a say through their "chosen representative". The rich billionaires are controlling every single politician long before they get in office and then use their media tools to make everybody vote for the guy they give the best coverage to.
One day I'm gonna stand on a big hill and shout I told you so.
.
people already know.
but just because you know doesnt mean you have to go up to a tall building and howl about it. -
2019-05-13 at 4:29 PM UTC
-
2019-05-13 at 4:31 PM UTC
Originally posted by Narc It wouldn't have made zero difference if trump or Clinton won. They'd both be following the exact same orders from the exact same people either way. How dumb people are that they don't get that.
Wrong. Clinton would've followed a similar path at a greatly accelerated schedule, and with far less resistance to open kinetic warfare with Russia. She was actively working to push for a 'no fly zone' over Syria, which was the measure that led to Ghadaffi's murder and the collapse of the most prosperous state in Africa.
-
2019-05-13 at 5:54 PM UTC
Originally posted by aldra Wrong. Clinton would've followed a similar path at a greatly accelerated schedule, and with far less resistance to open kinetic warfare with Russia. She was actively working to push for a 'no fly zone' over Syria, which was the measure that led to Ghadaffi's murder and the collapse of the most prosperous state in Africa.
What she said she was gonna do and what she would be told to actually do once in office are usually two different things. Name me one president since Kennedy that hasn't done uturns on at least some of the policies they stood for in their campaigns?
Why you think they all do these uturns? They don't get a choice in the matter.
. -
2019-05-13 at 6:46 PM UTCwanna trade him for trudeau? than the world would be totally fucked if wasn't already
-
2019-05-13 at 7:21 PM UTC
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson The Ops photo makes no sense…
It was the front page cover of Bing (Each day it changes at least once)
the chick looks to have been allowing it's newly formed wings to blow in the wind. It looked like he was raising his hands up. I thought of pasting a Bank Robber first but this one seemed funny to paste.
it makes me think of the young being strongarmed into a new globalist society .. taught early in life to fear "The Man" and 1984's newspeak
or Brave New World where we're all become Big Brother -
2019-05-13 at 7:26 PM UTC
Originally posted by aldra Wrong. Clinton would've followed a similar path at a greatly accelerated schedule, and with far less resistance to open kinetic warfare with Russia. She was actively working to push for a 'no fly zone' over Syria, which was the measure that led to Ghadaffi's murder and the collapse of the most prosperous state in Africa.
I have not been following this regions politics as much as most people. how was Ghadaffi's assasination or murder by the people (stoned to death?) apart of Syria? Making friends with them pissed off the local people of Libya?
PS would bang one of his all Female Guard Brigade
-
2019-05-14 at 4 AM UTC
Originally posted by Narc What she said she was gonna do and what she would be told to actually do once in office are usually two different things.
To think they're 'all the same' is almost as juvenile as taking their words at face value. To put it plainly, Hillary's intentions were obvious if you paid any attention to her time as Secretary of State, and the fact that they coincided with the goals of the two most powerful groups in Washington (the israel lobby and the war lobby/the MIC) meant there was little chance of the establishment hindering her. In fact, given how much she was being paid through the Clinton foundation and speaking engagements, it's more likely that her policies were fed directly to her from those very groups.
Trump on the other hand ran on a distinctly anti-establishment, anti-war platform, though it was obvious he didn't really understand the real political machine and was terribly naiive as to how things really worked. In the beginning he tried to make good on his campaign promises and even tried to withdraw US forces from several theatres, but in the end he was unable to stem the tide of the status quo and was swept up in it thanks in large part to his insane, sociopathic advisors and cabinet.
It's very difficult to defeat entrenched sources of power, but not altogether impossible. Intentionally or not, Trump delayed its machinations and his complete lack of tact is forcing it into the light; forcing the rest of the world to acknowledge it and make a choice.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2019-05-14 at 4:09 AM UTC
-
2019-05-14 at 4:19 AM UTCHeads are about to roll in the deep state, folks. Probably within the next three weeks, max. Comey, Brennan, Clapper, Lynch, Hillary, Strzok, Page, McCabe, Ohr, some clowns in the major fake news networks, major felonies coming down the pipe. This is going to be epic to watch, and it's for sure 100%. All these treasonous rats who thought they got away with everything are going right down the shit chute, and we're all going to watch it live at 6 o'clock.
-
2019-05-14 at 4:22 AM UTC
Originally posted by Tesla Coil I have not been following this regions politics as much as most people. how was Ghadaffi's assasination or murder by the people (stoned to death?) apart of Syria? Making friends with them pissed off the local people of Libya?
1. Ghadaffi was not stoned to death, he was sodomized with a bayonet then shot in the head as he bled out.
2. The bulk of the fighters in Libya were foreign.
The destruction of Libya was largely organised by England and France, but was only really successful thanks to US involvement. In short, Obongo did not want to get involved but he was pressured into it by Hillary, then-secretary of state. I won't go into how it was organised, but it was basically an information-warfare campaign, then the country was flooded with foreign fighters, then NATO created a 'no fly zone' over Libya in order to neutralise the technology advantage the government had over the rebels.
The claim was that the people were being 'freed from a dictator', but the true purpose was to punish the state for daring to trade oil in their own gold-backed currency instead of the dollar and to crush what appeared to be a state thriving under socialist policy.
This is the exact same blueprint that was later used on Syria - Obama was wary of putting too much overt pressure on the state though, fearing the impending collapse would affect the US' international prestige so he took it very slowly. This gave Russia an opportunity to intervene, as they'd learned from Yugoslavia, Libya and the Ukraine that late-stage diplomacy and even non-confrontational military action would fail - once Russia had deployed to Syria, Obama recognised that it would be extremely dangerous to continue the plan and declined to implement the proposed 'no fly zone'.
Hillary, on the other hand, howled about 'appearing weak' and Russia being a 'paper tiger' and talked at length about how she'd ground all aircraft over Syria and wasn't afraid to shoot down Russian jets. That insane rhetoric garnered a lot of support among the powers that be, with the establishment neoconservatives truly believing that Russia at the time would simply back down and be unable to defend itself - even now many of them still think that hypersonic missiles are either 'fake' or not a significant threat, that aircraft carriers can do more than bully brown people with no military to speak of.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2019-05-14 at 4:23 AM UTC
-
2019-05-14 at 4:24 AM UTCSpot on aldra. Killer accurate.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2019-05-14 at 5:13 AM UTC
-
2019-05-14 at 9:16 AM UTC
-
2019-05-14 at 9:31 AM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL Heads are about to roll in the deep state, folks. Probably within the next three weeks, max. Comey, Brennan, Clapper, Lynch, Hillary, Strzok, Page, McCabe, Ohr, some clowns in the major fake news networks, major felonies coming down the pipe. This is going to be epic to watch, and it's for sure 100%. All these treasonous rats who thought they got away with everything are going right down the shit chute, and we're all going to watch it live at 6 o'clock.
😂😂😂😂 -
2019-05-14 at 11:02 AM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL Heads are about to roll in the deep state, folks. Probably within the next three weeks, max. Comey, Brennan, Clapper, Lynch, Hillary, Strzok, Page, McCabe, Ohr, some clowns in the major fake news networks, major felonies coming down the pipe. This is going to be epic to watch, and it's for sure 100%. All these treasonous rats who thought they got away with everything are going right down the shit chute, and we're all going to watch it live at 6 o'clock.
I won't hold my breath. You should tho.
. -
2019-05-14 at 2:26 PM UTCThe Attorney General has all but admitted they're all going to prison.
-
2019-05-14 at 4:46 PM UTCJust waiting for Trump to unveil his secret wall.
