User Controls
*sigh* I have go to gay ass group therapy once a week because my dui...
-
2019-04-12 at 10:38 AM UTCwhip it like a nascar
-
2019-04-12 at 10:46 AM UTC
Originally posted by aldra do you want to eat the expense of having to go to court to try to prove it?
Tbph with you I'm extremely anti pigs, courts and judicial systems as I have a lot of experience of how fucked up and bullshit they are. But I'm also anti drink driving and people who do that can fuck right off. You ain't done it you have my sympathy as I know they is likely to fuck you anyway. But killer drivers should be off the road.
Would you be happy for a drunk to mount the sidewalk and wipe out half your family without any warning or anything?
. -
2019-04-12 at 11:01 AM UTC
Originally posted by Narc Tbph with you I'm extremely anti pigs, courts and judicial systems as I have a lot of experience of how fucked up and bullshit they are. But I'm also anti drink driving and people who do that can fuck right off. You ain't done it you have my sympathy as I know they is likely to fuck you anyway. But killer drivers should be off the road.
Would you be happy for a drunk to mount the sidewalk and wipe out half your family without any warning or anything?
I'm against intoxicated driving as well; that's a different point altogether though. THat new law in Canada literally allows a policeman to drug/alcohol test you and potentially arrest you if you're deemed intoxicated and they believe you've driven in the last two hours.
We're not talking about getting pulled over and tested for driving like a spastic or even 'random' roadside tests; this is police coming into your home or wherever else and testing you, potentially arresting you if you're drunk and they think you might've driven recently. -
2019-04-12 at 11:03 AM UTC
Originally posted by aldra I'm against intoxicated driving as well; that's a different point altogether though. THat new law in Canada literally allows a policeman to drug/alcohol test you and potentially arrest you if you're deemed intoxicated and they believe you've driven in the last two hours.
We're not talking about getting pulled over and tested for driving like a spastic or even 'random' roadside tests; this is police coming into your home or wherever else and testing you, potentially arresting you if you're drunk and they think you might've driven recently.
Now that’s a load of shit. Cops could easily take out vendettas against their enemies. Not that some don’t already. -
2019-04-12 at 11:06 AM UTCYep. I'm not part of the 'kill cops etc' crowd but the last thing they need is more power and less oversight.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2019-04-12 at 12:53 PM UTC
-
2019-04-12 at 11:06 PM UTC
Originally posted by aldra I'm against intoxicated driving as well; that's a different point altogether though. THat new law in Canada literally allows a policeman to drug/alcohol test you and potentially arrest you if you're deemed intoxicated and they believe you've driven in the last two hours.
We're not talking about getting pulled over and tested for driving like a spastic or even 'random' roadside tests; this is police coming into your home or wherever else and testing you, potentially arresting you if you're drunk and they think you might've driven recently.
Yeah I get it. But I am pretty torn with this between knowing pigs can't be trusted and knowing people who think not walking or getting a cab just to get home or go see some piece of ass is more important than everybody else's life need to be sorted. Iean if some drunk idiot gets reported by someone on the drive home coz they were clearly all over the road and the pigs track him down an hour or so later and he fails a breath test then I think its pretty clear and he needs banning. Its up to the courts to consider the facts carefully. Whether they will or not is anyones guess. Especially when judges are good friends with private prison owners.
. -
2019-04-12 at 11:07 PM UTCMake shit up. Treat it as a creative exercise. Be consistent though.
-
2019-04-12 at 11:22 PM UTC
Originally posted by Technologist Now that’s a load of shit. Cops could easily take out vendettas against their enemies. Not that some don’t already.
This is supposed to be the reason why we have courts for, to keep cops in check. But now a days they're pretty much all in bed together. Over the last 20 or 30 years the courts have been given much more leeway designed to make it easier for them to convict. All done under the guise of "preventing criminals getting away with it". The media were making a big fuss and nobody was saying " if they were found not guilty you can't then claim they got away with it. A court just studied the facts and proved them innocent".
This is the result of all that. There were reasons why the courts had all those provisions and restrictions set in the first place. To protect the innocent.
. -
2019-04-13 at 4:16 AM UTC
Originally posted by Narc Its up to the courts to consider the facts carefully.
my major concern with this is the courts are pay to play, ie. if you can't afford a (decent) lawyer you have little chance of (effectively) contesting it. for people who are poor or don't understand the legal system there's not much to be done when you find the hairy balls of the law dangling over you.
in many cases people have eventually been found not guilty of crimes but still end up paying back costs to prove it a decade later.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2019-04-13 at 4:22 AM UTCJust go in, hug everyone warmly, kiss them on the side of the cheek, carry a Holy Bible, and smile a lot. You'll be fine.
-
2019-04-13 at 4:39 AM UTCI went to a private lawyer who acted like I was gonna get 5-10 class C felonies.
Then I fired him and went to my court appointed who was tight with the fresh DA and he said "I'll tell her it's just a high level personal use case and you'll be fine". -
2019-04-13 at 4:45 AM UTCthe C is for Cool
-
2019-04-13 at 12:50 PM UTC
Originally posted by aldra my major concern with this is the courts are pay to play, ie. if you can't afford a (decent) lawyer you have little chance of (effectively) contesting it. for people who are poor or don't understand the legal system there's not much to be done when you find the hairy balls of the law dangling over you.
in many cases people have eventually been found not guilty of crimes but still end up paying back costs to prove it a decade later.
Absolutely, courts and pigs are just two arms of the same govt/elite body. How people fail to understand this is fucking laughable.
Its like when cops are interviewing a suspect and they come out with that old 'just tell us what happened and well put a good word in with the judge for you and get you a lighter sentence".
Think about it, if they can do that then they can also put in a bad word and get you screwed. How the fuck is that impartiality on the part of the courts?
. -
2019-04-14 at 10:59 AM UTCEducate yourself on the DUI decimal system.
-
2019-04-14 at 11:01 AM UTCHuey, DUI, and Lewy.
