User Controls
I know this is a tired topic, but how the fuck are people religious.
-
2016-11-27 at 1:20 PM UTC
Originally posted by Enter Hahaha this fucking faggot just keeps deflecting and changing the topic whenever he gets backed into a corner.
How many fucking topics have you moved through? Did you just give up trying to debate antinatalism?
There has still been no debate. Just more "you don't believe what I believe so you're an idiot." -
2016-11-27 at 1:20 PM UTC
Originally posted by 180gr 10mm FMJ Because still, no evidence has been presented against it.
WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THOSE TWO QUESTIONS?
Originally posted by 180gr 10mm FMJ OK, I'm just now starting to realize this was a bait thread. Good job, enter, you got me.
No, don't you DARE back out you fucking faggot.
You specifically said that those two questions were different. How are they different, faggot? -
2016-11-27 at 1:21 PM UTC
Originally posted by 180gr 10mm FMJ That is most definitely not the question you asked in the OP.
You even quoted my OP so I couldn't get out of it.
Now how are those two questions different? -
2016-11-27 at 1:21 PM UTC
Originally posted by 180gr 10mm FMJ There has still been no debate. Just more "you don't believe what I believe so you're an idiot."
Literally all three of us believe in God. This has been stated numerous times now. -
2016-11-27 at 1:24 PM UTC
Originally posted by Enter You even quoted my OP so I couldn't get out of it.
Now how are those two questions different?
First you ask "how anyone can believe in God with 'clear evidence against it'" in your OP and then you ask "how my God is any different than a general God" in your most recent post.
These questions are very much different. -
2016-11-27 at 1:26 PM UTC
Originally posted by 180gr 10mm FMJ First you ask "how anyone can believe in God with 'clear evidence against it'" in your OP and then you ask "how my God is any different than a general God" in your most recent post.
These questions are very much different.
That question was asked afterwards, you fucking moron.
You know damn well we're talking about these:
http://niggasin.space/thread/5572?p=3#post-70162
You're a moron. Your arguing skills are shit.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2016-11-27 at 1:30 PM UTC
Originally posted by 180gr 10mm FMJ Because still, no evidence has been presented against it.
you cannot disprove a metaphysical statement, you ignoramus.
Originally posted by antinatalism kek, but I just said that I'm not mocking u because of your religious beliefs, but because u're a brainless pussy.
let me just recap 4 u:
- the burden of proof is on u. y'know, it's called affirmanti incumbit probatio. u claim something exists, u gotta prove it if u want to be taken seriously
- the universe doesn't need religion to be expained so occam's razor suggests that there's no god
- however, the focus was on how religion is obsolete in the digital age, not how unreasonable it is
- u failed to understand that, and u started whining like a crybaby bitch "who are u to judge, truth doesn't matter as long as it works 4 me"
- I kept stating facts, and u kept whining and failing to understand everything like a retard
still waiting u to address each of my points.
Originally posted by antinatalism but religious=stupid, wtf are u arguing about. and I'm not even ferven atheist à la dawkins, I'm more of an agnostic. While I appreciate the cultural contributions that some religions helped to make in the past centuries (I could think about bach, michelangelo, the role of medieval monks in preserving greek and latin manuscripts by transcribing them and so on), but in our nowadays digital society the amount of contributions that christianity could give amount to 0. FUCKING ZERO, U DIPSHIT. so u don't even have the excuse "well yo man religions are likely bullshit but at least think about muh contributions to our culture": the whole point is not that religions are bullshits, the point is that they're obsolete. it's the kurrent year, man, the only god that's worth to be worshipped is the kek
still waiting u to address this post without failing to understand it. show me what kind of cultural contributions religion can still give to a digital age
Originally posted by 180gr 10mm FMJ There has still been no debate. Just more "you don't believe what I believe so you're an idiot."
I stated facts, u whined like a bitch saying that those facts hurt your feeling and truth doesn't matter if bullshits work 4 u. go back to your safe space
Post last edited by antinatalism at 2016-11-27T13:33:28.617069+00:00 -
2016-11-27 at 1:39 PM UTC
Originally posted by antinatalism you cannot disprove a metaphysical statement, you ignoramus.
still waiting u to address each of my points.
still waiting u to address this post without failing to understand it. show me what kind of cultural contributions religion can still give to a digital age
I stated facts, u whined like a bitch saying that those facts hurt your feeling and truth doesn't matter if bullshits work 4 u. go back to your safe space
Post last edited by antinatalism at 2016-11-27T13:33:28.617069+00:00
None of those points are facts, only opinions.
Bait thread confirmed. -
2016-11-27 at 2 PM UTCBecause people like the idea of going to heaven, and when they see a million other people believe in something, it makes it that much easier to believe themselves. People want something to believe in. It's really quite simple. It gives people a sense of purpose, of hope, of community.
-
2016-11-27 at 2:21 PM UTC
Originally posted by 180gr 10mm FMJ None of those points are facts, only opinions.
> u cannot disprove a metaphysical statement
Bait thread confirmed.
> this above is not a fact
just an example -
2016-11-27 at 4:39 PM UTC
Originally posted by mmQ Because people like the idea of going to heaven, and when they see a million other people believe in something, it makes it that much easier to believe themselves. People want something to believe in. It's really quite simple. It gives people a sense of purpose, of hope, of community.
This is an acceptable answer. -
2016-11-27 at 5:11 PM UTCThere are spirits all around us white man.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2016-11-27 at 5:30 PM UTCOkay, let's see... from that pic, here's the ones I've had...
Stoli original, captain morgan black, bombae saphire, maker's mark, jack, wild turkey 101, ketel one, bacardi black, bacardi oakheart, captain morgan spiced, jw red label, jameson, canadian club, absolute original, jim beam, malibu...
fuck that's okay for a guy who rarely drinks.
-
2016-11-27 at 6:14 PM UTC
Originally posted by antinatalism but in our nowadays digital society the amount of contributions that christianity could give amount to 0. FUCKING ZERO, U DIPSHIT. so u don't even have the excuse "well yo man religions are likely bullshit but at least think about muh contributions to our culture": the whole point is not that religions are bullshits, the point is that they're obsolete. it's the kurrent year, man, the only god that's worth to be worshipped is the kek
I can't tell if this is supposed to be satire or not. Do you really think we can't find examples of art or science that have been inspired by religious sentiment in the modern era? Do you not think there's value in the human communities organized around religion? -
2016-11-27 at 6:20 PM UTCIt's all a matter of perspective.
-
2016-11-28 at 2:58 PM UTC
Originally posted by Lanny I can't tell if this is supposed to be satire or not. Do you really think we can't find examples of art or science that have been inspired by religious sentiment in the modern era? Do you not think there's value in the human communities organized around religion?
I do. I mean, I bet you could name a few, but they're neither as important nor as numerous as the plethora of examples from, let's say, the late middle ages or the reinassance. u gotta deal with the fact that religion is not as effective as it was back then as a form of knowledge to satisfy the urge for answers to metaphysical questions. in a digital age where technology is constantly idolized and feared, movements such as transhumanism offer a much better and modern approach to metaphysics -
2016-11-28 at 3:13 PM UTCA thread I didn't read! Whoa.
-
2016-11-28 at 6:04 PM UTC
Originally posted by antinatalism - the universe doesn't need religion to be expained so occam's razor suggests that there's no god
Thats wrong though. Occams razor suggests that the universe doesnt need science to be explained since theology is a simpler explanation than sciencology. -
2016-11-28 at 6:17 PM UTC
Originally posted by thelittlestnigger Thats wrong though. Occams razor suggests that the universe doesnt need science to be explained since theology is a simpler explanation than sciencology.
Well, "God did it" may be simpler but theology doesn't stop there. Once you go into detail about religion there is only one way to apply any razor and that is slitting your wrists up to the elbows. -
2016-11-28 at 6:25 PM UTC
Originally posted by RisiR Well, "God did it" may be simpler but theology doesn't stop there. Once you go into detail about religion there is only one way to apply any razor and that is slitting your wrists up to the elbows.
Not really accurate at all. No matter how complex theology may get it is still simpler than quantum physics. Ergo according to Ockham (who was a fransican friar btw) the teologic explanation is more well suited than the scientific.
