User Controls

Navigation

Niggas in Space > Bitch and Moan > Lanny, how do you decide how long to banny?
  3. 1
  4. 2
  5. 3
  6. 4

Lanny, how do you decide how long to banny?

  1. 2019-03-23 at 2:57 AM UTC
    #61
    Technologist victim of incest
    AND

    That’s my point exactly.
  2. 2019-03-23 at 3 AM UTC
    #62
    Who African Astronaut [that staidly controlling tamarillo]
    Originally posted by -SpectraL There's no "now what". It just goes on and on forever. That's the way this works.

    Might be time to move on and let interesting people not be intimidated by old time shit posters, but carry on
  3. 2019-03-23 at 3:04 AM UTC
    #63
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Who Might be time to move on and let interesting people not be intimidated by old time shit posters, but carry on

    There's no intimidation. People come here, see what it is, then stay of their own free will. They like being here, obviously. They just don't like a trigger-happy admin who bans people when he's drunk, plays favorites, and has an ego the size of a small dump truck. Apparently, too.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  4. 2019-03-23 at 3:06 AM UTC
    #64
    The Self Taught Man Black Hole
    Originally posted by -SpectraL There's no intimidation. People come here, see what it is, then stay of their own free will. They like being here, obviously. They just don't like a trigger-happy admin who bans people when he's drunk, plays favorites, and has an ego the size of a small dump truck. Apparently, too.

    I don’t get the ego thing. I’ve never seen lanny be particularly full of himself?
  5. 2019-03-23 at 3:09 AM UTC
    #65
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by -mal- I don’t get the ego thing. I’ve never seen lanny be particularly full of himself?

    He is, it's just he's very good at concealing it. But a trained eye can see it no problem.
  6. 2019-03-23 at 3:14 AM UTC
    #66
    Technologist victim of incest
    Do you have a trained eye?

    Did you go to The School of Spotting Dump Truck Egos?
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  7. 2019-03-23 at 3:48 AM UTC
    #67
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Technologist Do you have a trained eye?

    Did you go to The School of Spotting Dump Truck Egos?

    I actually have both eyes trained. You can tell by his comments. There's always that snide, vinegar-like taste to them.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  8. 2019-03-23 at 4:14 AM UTC
    #68
    Lanny Bird of Courage
    Originally posted by -SpectraL They just don't like a trigger-happy admin who bans people when he's drunk

    If I didn't ban people when I'm drunk, then when would I ban people? I can't ban people while I'm sleeping so we're pretty much out of options here speckles.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  9. 2019-03-23 at 4:37 AM UTC
    #69
    HTS highlight reel
    Originally posted by -SpectraL They just don't like a trigger-happy admin who bans people when he's drunk

    If anything I'm fine with this, I just think the trigger happy bans should all be equal instead of their length being defined via a moment-to-moment subjective determination of how annoying the person is being/has been in the past. *shrug*

    I mean if I was ever an admin I'd probably be doing it the way he does it too, but it's like Wild West justice. There need to be rules for how bans work, not just how you get banned. :o :o
  10. 2019-03-23 at 4:40 AM UTC
    #70
    The Self Taught Man Black Hole
    Originally posted by HTS If anything I'm fine with this, I just think the trigger happy bans should all be equal instead of their length being defined via a moment-to-moment subjective determination of how annoying the person is being/has been in the past. *shrug*

    I mean if I was ever an admin I'd probably be doing it the way he does it too, but it's like Wild West justice.

    AHRHGHGERHFERIFHERGREGJeKOELV

    Lil' Empty IS NOT able to do it all by himself as evidenced by


    He can't rationally deny that *bzzzzzt*
  11. 2019-03-23 at 5:22 AM UTC
    #71
    Ghost Black Hole
    Originally posted by -SpectraL There's no intimidation. People come here, see what it is, then stay of their own free will. They like being here, obviously. They just don't like a trigger-happy admin who bans people when he's drunk, plays favorites, and has an ego the size of a small dump truck. Apparently, too.

    NOBODY SHOULD EVER BE BANNED!!!

    GET TUFF!!
  12. 2019-03-23 at 5:33 AM UTC
    #72
    Fonaplats victim of incest [daylong jump-start that nome]
    Who owns the record for longest ban?
    And who else besides me has managed to reverse a perma-ban through diplomatic talks?
  13. 2019-03-23 at 5:34 AM UTC
    #73
    Lanny Bird of Courage
    Originally posted by Fonaplats Who owns the record for longest ban?
    And who else besides me has managed to reverse a perma-ban through diplomatic talks?

    finny, on both counts
  14. 2019-03-23 at 5:36 AM UTC
    #74
    Ghost Black Hole
    I was permabanned more than once, lies
  15. 2019-03-23 at 5:52 AM UTC
    #75
    vindicktive vinny Black Hole
    Originally posted by HTS If anything I'm fine with this, I just think the trigger happy bans should all be equal instead of their length being defined via a moment-to-moment subjective determination of how annoying the person is being/has been in the past. *shrug*

    I mean if I was ever an admin I'd probably be doing it the way he does it too, but it's like Wild West justice. There need to be rules for how bans work, not just how you get banned. :o :o

    for that you need a MAN to run the things,
  16. 2019-03-23 at 6:04 AM UTC
    #76
    Ghost Black Hole
    who needs a man when we have a S O Y B O Y
  17. 2019-03-23 at 12:18 PM UTC
    #77
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by HTS If anything I'm fine with this, I just think the trigger happy bans should all be equal instead of their length being defined via a moment-to-moment subjective determination of how annoying the person is being/has been in the past. *shrug*

    I mean if I was ever an admin I'd probably be doing it the way he does it too, but it's like Wild West justice. There need to be rules for how bans work, not just how you get banned. :o :o

    So, you admit there ARE trigger happy bans Lanny is responsible for. Very good. I would warn about providing him any logical observations, though, as he might ban you to "make it equal" and try and come out on top that way. He's done it before.
  3. 1
  4. 2
  5. 3
  6. 4
Jump to Top