User Controls
Rise up Men of the West.
-
2019-03-22 at 9:59 AM UTC
Originally posted by Red_Woman "This same government removed the name of Jesus Christ from the Parliamentary Prayer to ensure “that the prayer would no longer be specifically Christian in nature.” Parliament opened with an Islamic prayer in Arabic when it sat this week for the first time since the massacre. Many public institutions have also issued guidelines for behaviour and dress at events tomorrow. Many private organisation are encouraging their female staff to wear hijab (headscarves), a sign of religious submission. The following was sent out by the University of Auckland: On Friday, for at least a moment, New Zealand will become an Islamic nation as “there is no god but Allah” and “rise up for prayer” will be broadcast by prime-ministerial decree."
https://www.theunshackled.net/rundown/nz-government-to-broadcast-there-is-no-god-but-allah-this-friday/
I may be giving Tarrant far too much credit here, but he certainly chose the perfect country for the attack. NZ is probably THE 'liberal democracy' success story; socially it's the country that would've (and has) tripped over itself hardest and fastest to pander to the 'victim group' and vilify the 'attacker group'. Ardern's immediate response was to immediately drop to her knees and gag on the minaret, which is possibly the worst thing she possibly could've done if she genuinely wanted to stop the conflict from accelerating.
What she's doing goes far beyond paying respects and trying to repair relations - both sides, whites and muslims, interpret this as her prostrating herself before the muslim minority. It does nothing but push moderates, and people who did not believe in a cultural struggle, into the arms of hardliners.
Islamists are vindicated in their claims of growing power and prestige in the country, and their eventual goal of cultural takeover. White Nationalists are vindicated in their warnings that the government is beholden to the interests of foreigners and business interests, and that 'their people' need to take it back.
Everyone (with pieces on the board) is playing the game he laid out in his manifesto. Is it because they're stupid, because they want to, or because they simply don't know any other way?
Or simply because they think they can benefit from the situation and be gone before machete season?The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2019-03-22 at 10:28 AM UTCI couldn't have said any better myself. ^ It's mindblowing how short sighted these politicians seems to be (or are they really?)
Spiked makes a good point about a similar argument that you are making, on the decision of Jacinda to not name Tarrant.What they don’t seem to grasp is that, for Tarrant, the manifesto served the role of a prop. The visuals and the impression he was able to convey were the most important parts of his action.
https://www.spiked-online.com/2019/03/21/new-zealand-dont-turn-the-christchurch-killer-into-voldemort/
Unfortunately, the refusal to name terrorists is unlikely to undermine the capacity of terrorists to gain publicity. Governments can actually make matters worse by unwittingly cultivating a sense of mystique and power around the persona of a terrorist who cannot be named. Sections of the public will interpret the reluctance to name terrorists as an expression of fear rather than of defiance. In any case, whether Tarrant realises his objective of gaining fame depends not on whether he is named, but on how society responds to him and his act of terror. Unfortunately, it seems that politicians and the media respond to acts of terror precisely in accordance with the expectations of the terrorists.
instead of treating the massacre at Christchurch in its own context, as a specific crime, the media have tended to represent it as part of a growing international problem. No doubt terrorism is a serious problem confronting the world in the 21st century, but it is made all the worse if every single incident perpetrated by a lone wolf or a fame-seeking lunatic is depicted as part of global dynamic. In this way, society provides an ‘oxygen of publicity’ to its own fears. It responds to an act of terror by terrorising itself with fantasies of international plots.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2019-03-22 at 10:37 AM UTC
Originally posted by aldra I may be giving Tarrant far too much credit here, but he certainly chose the perfect country for the attack. NZ is probably THE 'liberal democracy' success story; socially it's the country that would've (and has) tripped over itself hardest and fastest to pander to the 'victim group' and vilify the 'attacker group'. Ardern's immediate response was to immediately drop to her knees and gag on the minaret, which is possibly the worst thing she possibly could've done if she genuinely wanted to stop the conflict from accelerating.
What she's doing goes far beyond paying respects and trying to repair relations - both sides, whites and muslims, interpret this as her prostrating herself before the muslim minority. It does nothing but push moderates, and people who did not believe in a cultural struggle, into the arms of hardliners.
Islamists are vindicated in their claims of growing power and prestige in the country, and their eventual goal of cultural takeover. White Nationalists are vindicated in their warnings that the government is beholden to the interests of foreigners and business interests, and that 'their people' need to take it back.
Everyone (with pieces on the board) is playing the game he laid out in his manifesto. Is it because they're stupid, because they want to, or because they simply don't know any other way?
Or simply because they think they can benefit from the situation and be gone before machete season?
I thought the video was fake until I heard that he did it there "to show that no country is safe"
The cabal has always thought of New Zealand as a safe haven for when their actions destroy most of the world
It could still be a false flag though, NZ was the only other first World country that allowed semi-autos iirc, though they were expensive as fuck -
2019-03-22 at 11:14 AM UTC
Originally posted by Jυicebox I thought the video was fake until I heard that he did it there "to show that no country is safe"
The cabal has always thought of New Zealand as a safe haven for when their actions destroy most of the world
It could still be a false flag though, NZ was the only other first World country that allowed semi-autos iirc, though they were expensive as fuck
What do you mean "it could still be a false flag"? In ref. to what? -
2019-03-22 at 11:30 AM UTC
Originally posted by Red_Woman What do you mean "it could still be a false flag"? In ref. to what?
it would make sense as a false flag if the goal were to remove gun rights and create support for the expansion of the surveillance state.
A lot of people seem to start from that: they start from the assumption that any high profile attack that could benefit the 'government' WAS orchestrated by the powers that be, and then they collect as much 'evidence' as they can to support the theory. I'm not suggesting JB is one of them, but you see the same pattern from certain people and sites every time something like this happens. See Kr'oz and Spectral's replies in the earlier threads or the majority of sites and blogs solely dedicated to 'secret societies' and 'conspiracies'.
In short, the attack could've been staged or even faked by powerful groups for political goals, but I see no significant evidence for that. It seems much more likely that they just (crassly) took advantage of the situation immediately.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2019-03-22 at 11:39 AM UTC
Originally posted by aldra I may be giving Tarrant far too much credit here, but he certainly chose the perfect country for the attack. NZ is probably THE 'liberal democracy' success story; socially it's the country that would've (and has) tripped over itself hardest and fastest to pander to the 'victim group' and vilify the 'attacker group'. Ardern's immediate response was to immediately drop to her knees and gag on the minaret, which is possibly the worst thing she possibly could've done if she genuinely wanted to stop the conflict from accelerating.
What she's doing goes far beyond paying respects and trying to repair relations - both sides, whites and muslims, interpret this as her prostrating herself before the muslim minority. It does nothing but push moderates, and people who did not believe in a cultural struggle, into the arms of hardliners.
Islamists are vindicated in their claims of growing power and prestige in the country, and their eventual goal of cultural takeover. White Nationalists are vindicated in their warnings that the government is beholden to the interests of foreigners and business interests, and that 'their people' need to take it back.
Everyone (with pieces on the board) is playing the game he laid out in his manifesto. Is it because they're stupid, because they want to, or because they simply don't know any other way?
Or simply because they think they can benefit from the situation and be gone before machete season?
their fate was written and sealed the moment they decided to put a her in charge of their history.
now its just new z'land herstory.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2019-03-22 at 11:49 AM UTC
Originally posted by aldra it would make sense as a false flag if the goal were to remove gun rights and create support for the expansion of the surveillance state.
A lot of people seem to start from that: they start from the assumption that any high profile attack that could benefit the 'government' WAS orchestrated by the powers that be, and then they collect as much 'evidence' as they can to support the theory. I'm not suggesting JB is one of them, but you see the same pattern from certain people and sites every time something like this happens. See Kr'oz and Spectral's replies in the earlier threads or the majority of sites and blogs solely dedicated to 'secret societies' and 'conspiracies'.
In short, the attack could've been staged or even faked by powerful groups for political goals, but I see no significant evidence for that. It seems much more likely that they just (crassly) took advantage of the situation immediately.
Ah gotcha. Yeah, I agree with you on this. Although despite not being one for conpiracy theories, I've know a lot of shit that has been done in Italy during the 70s and the 80s, that you would think it's fiction but it's not. So, at this point I'm ruling nothing out.
Meanwhile, in the land of hypocrisy and pandering to islamists...
-
2019-03-22 at 11:49 AM UTC
-
2019-03-22 at 11:51 AM UTC
Originally posted by Red_Woman Ah gotcha. Yeah, I agree with you on this. Although despite not being one for conpiracy theories, I've know a lot of shit that has been done in Italy during the 70s and the 80s, that you would think it's fiction but it's not. So, at this point I'm ruling nothing out.
yeah, it's weird how few people seem to know about Gladio -
2019-03-22 at 11:51 AM UTC
Originally posted by Red_Woman Ah gotcha. Yeah, I agree with you on this. Although despite not being one for conpiracy theories, I've know a lot of shit that has been done in Italy during the 70s and the 80s, that you would think it's fiction but it's not. So, at this point I'm ruling nothing out.
Meanwhile, in the land of hypocrisy and pandering to islamists…
theres no turning back.
they've already uttered the shahada.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2019-03-22 at 11:52 AM UTC
-
2019-03-22 at 11:53 AM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny my browser cant zoom due to your stupid web setting,
and even if i could, it still wouldnt word wrap automatically which means in addition to having to scroll up and down, id also need to scroll horizontally from left to right and back.
Sounds like you need a new browser -
2019-03-22 at 11:57 AM UTC
-
2019-03-22 at 12:05 PM UTC
Originally posted by Narc I dunno what that's gotta do with it, but see yourself..
How long you think your sort would last in there banny? Think you could handle it?
.
thats just like your typical british weekend in a british pub or a british football game plus a pinch of the usual BBC documentary over-dramatization.
im soft, but that doesnt make british prisons and their residents, current and former, hard. their as hard as cheese. -
2019-03-22 at 12:15 PM UTC
Originally posted by aldra yeah, it's weird how few people seem to know about Gladio
Ikr? Stay-behind operations was in place in many NATO member countries, and some neutral countries too. It was officially confirmed by the Prime Minister of italy,Giulio Andreotti,in the early 90s. Even Italians from the new generation don't know about it, despite many documentaries and tv programs have been shown on Italian TV on the subject tbh.
Not only that, but all the clandestine subversion groups sponsored by the state, or other "forces". Italy for example have a long and well documented history with them, during the terror years (the so-called "Years of Lead".)
The "deep state" as they call it in USA (we called it parallel state) heavily sponsored the far righ groups and organised massacres ( see the massacre of Piazza Fontana, Piazza della Loggia, Bologna massacre.)
However, and this is the interesting part, they also helped the red terrorist groups.
This is the part of the story mostly covered in "mystery" still today. Everybody speaks and knows about the right-wing subversive groups and the state. But few speak openly about the left-wing groups and the state. But the kidnapping and killing of Aldo Moro speaks volumes about the collusion between these powerful "behind the scenes" players and the red terrorists, including foreign powers and CIA.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2019-03-22 at 4:11 PM UTCFuck Lanny when you gonna learn and permaban this dumb cunt?
. -
2019-03-22 at 4:54 PM UTC
-
2019-03-22 at 5:09 PM UTC
-
2019-03-22 at 5:18 PM UTC
-
2019-03-22 at 5:30 PM UTC
