User Controls
Christchurch shooting video
-
2019-03-16 at 10:46 PM UTCBefore you lose your shit brown noser, let me get my point across in an upcoming thread, I would be interested to hear your opinion of the discussed subject matter.
-
2019-03-16 at 11:20 PM UTCYou fucking pieces of shit. Especially you now, SpectraL
You're creating these stupid conspiracy to deflect what happened on the key site.
totse was never a White Nationalist site. it allowed all people .. I don't know what the fuck happened on Zoklet to bring in this shit. There were people trolling racism on totse and it was tolderated because they didn't want to ban free speech (until I came along with Christian speek and this didn't go well with the alternative thinkers)
yet that being said. I am bashed for making true statements and facts that Totse's history is being scrubbed from one of the only fucking archive crawlers there is. and pretty much all of you witness this. yet you make these agrecious statements that the NZ mosque might be another "Sandy Hook" fake? when we know Sandy Hook was not faked??
all I said was I was amased how the guy had a near perfect stream and never cut out (which is highly unusual in the best cell tower locations) but I don't think this is staged. it's damn good if it is.
but lets be real? what was totse about? every topic out there. Including how to make weapons and backyard ballistics and rockets and shit. this is crazy. Harper reed and his buddy take out a hay stack. sure it wasn't a person, but the system usually doesn't view this as an exception. they were placed on watchlist for the rest of their lives? but Obama hires him. "Totse Forever" on his own personal site. He's a good guy I'm sure, but he's working in Government. Zok apparently worked in Government while someone gets nailed for a felony forgery case of coupons in the hundreds of thousands of dollars.
But the Government didn't shut down Totse. So why would they take your guns away? at most.. like the feds did after 9/11.. they shut down one of the forums. so most likely the guns won't be sold anymore, but it doesn't matter. those AR-15 can soon be printed on more advance 3D printers. dudes in America and Mexico and the Filipines will take one apart and reverse engineer it and then make a ghost gun with no serial.
So using the philosophy of Totse. You shut me down, they will just go to the local library and learn about the subject (not sure if books on these subjects of weapons making have been pulled from all libraries, but I'm sure a mom and pop book store will order one for you.
fucking totse. I never said Jeff was apart of 9/11 I said he threatened me with intent to fuck my life up by not finding employment because he wrote the standard hiring software's that became a corporate standard?
clear links with Obama who hired James comey who lets Mrs Clinton walk.
"Full Transparency" is what James Comey, Jeff Hunter and many other who was taught this by Billionaire Ray Daleo is preached all over their LinkedIn and probably Facebook as well.
OK Jeff. Full Transparency. I want a copy of that Manifesto thread that was posted. don't be a hypocrite. -
2019-03-17 at 12:13 AM UTCBring back the BeigeWarlock!!
-
2019-03-17 at 12:49 AM UTC
-
2019-03-17 at 1:33 AM UTCLeave muslam alone
-
2019-03-17 at 4:58 AM UTCits funny to think that there are mosques in christs church, but not the other way round.
-
2019-03-17 at 6:58 AM UTC
-
2019-03-17 at 7:13 AM UTC
Originally posted by Octavian Everything was going so fast. I don't remember children?
So when he came back and shot them some more.. 2 children where up on the wall on a ledge type bench or large crown like molding but waist high from the floor. He seemed he didnt need to shoot them. He is still a murdering piece of shit. -
2019-03-17 at 7:33 AM UTC
Originally posted by Krow So when he came back and shot them some more.. 2 children where up on the wall on a ledge type bench or large crown like molding but waist high from the floor. He seemed he didnt need to shoot them. He is still a murdering piece of shit.
Terrorism is part and parcel of life in a big city. -
2019-03-17 at 9 AM UTC
-
2019-03-17 at 9:05 AM UTC
Originally posted by aldra I have no problem with muslims doing what they want in their own countries and support them defending themselves from foreign invaders, even if those invaders are from my country or 'racial group'. I do share some of that guy's concerns in terms of failure to assimilate, population replacement etc. but if I were him, ie. serious about making a difference, I would've gone after the policymakers that are using unchecked immigration in such a way, not the immigrants themselves.
https://metro.co.uk/2019/03/16/british-man-arrested-supporting-new-zealand-mosque-attack-online-post-8914580/
wonder if this qualifies -
2019-03-17 at 9:13 AM UTCMalicious communications
Section 127 of the act makes it an offence to send a message that is grossly offensive or of an indecent, obscene or menacing character over a public electronic communications network.[9] The section replaced section 43 of the Telecommunications Act 1984 and is drafted as widely as its predecessor.[10] The section has been used controversially to prosecute users of social media in cases such as the Twitter Joke Trial and Facebook comments concerning the murder of April Jones.[11]
On 19 December 2012, to strike a balance between freedom of speech and criminality, the Director of Public Prosecutions issued interim guidelines, clarifying when social messaging is eligible for criminal prosecution under UK law. Only communications that are credible threats of violence, harassment, or stalking (such as aggressive Internet trolling) which specifically targets an individual or individuals, or breaches a court order designed to protect someone (such as those protecting the identity of a victim of a sexual offence) will be prosecuted. Communications that express an "unpopular or unfashionable opinion about serious or trivial matters, or banter or humour, even if distasteful to some and painful to those subjected to it" will not. Communications that are merely "grossly offensive, indecent, obscene or false" will be prosecuted only when it can be shown to be necessary and proportionate. People who pass on malicious messages, such as by retweeting, can also be prosecuted when the original message is subject to prosecution. Individuals who post messages as part of a separate crime, such as a plan to import drugs, would face prosecution for that offence, as is currently the case.[12][13][14]
Revisions to the interim guidelines were issued on 20 June 2013 following a public consultation.[15] The revisions specified that prosecutors should consider:
whether messages were aggravated by references to race, religion or other minorities, and whether they breached existing rules to counter harassment or stalking; and
the age and maturity of any wrongdoer should be taken into account and given great weight.
The revisions also clarified that criminal prosecutions were "unlikely":
when the author of the message had "expressed genuine remorse";
when "swift and effective action ... to remove the communication" was taken; or
when messages were not intended for a wide audience.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communications_Act_2003#Malicious_communications -
2019-03-17 at 9:17 AM UTC
Only communications that are credible threats of violence, harassment, or stalking (such as aggressive Internet trolling) which specifically targets an individual or individuals, or breaches a court order designed to protect someone (such as those protecting the identity of a victim of a sexual offence) will be prosecuted. Communications that express an "unpopular or unfashionable opinion about serious or trivial matters, or banter or humour, even if distasteful to some and painful to those subjected to it" will not.
🙄 -
2019-03-17 at 9:18 AM UTChttps://dailystormer.name/christchurch-new-zealand-mosque-recruited-al-qaeda-jihadists-killed-in-drone-strikes/
https://www.newshub.co.nz/nznews/christchurch-mosque-linked-to-alqaida-suspect-2014060417
this is interesting
the particular mosque that was attacked has a history of 'radicalising' people who later joined foreign jihadist groups, and was previously under state surveillance of some kindThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2019-03-17 at 9:20 AM UTCI wonder why almost nobody is reporting this
-
2019-03-17 at 11:43 AM UTC
Originally posted by aldra https://dailystormer.name/christchurch-new-zealand-mosque-recruited-al-qaeda-jihadists-killed-in-drone-strikes/
https://www.newshub.co.nz/nznews/christchurch-mosque-linked-to-alqaida-suspect-2014060417
this is interesting
the particular mosque that was attacked has a history of 'radicalising' people who later joined foreign jihadist groups, and was previously under state surveillance of some kind
That is very interesting, indeed. -
2019-03-17 at 12 PM UTCAm I the only one that thought that mosque was extremely creepy and unnerving?
If I was going to worship the Lord I would not do it in a place like that
Especially the carpets -
2019-03-17 at 12:06 PM UTC
-
2019-03-17 at 12:09 PM UTCLol two homegrown faggot drone victims that thought themselves to be Che Guevaras and change the world.
I do like how the 2 terrorists were actually full on Kiwis with no Arab ties. So they were picked to be brainwashed as they probably had similar traits as the retard that shot the place up.
- Likely to be on the spectrum
- An overbearing need to fit in. Further verified by their willingness to fight for the cause inshallah hurr durr.
"Dumb white cannon fodder thought Muhammad. -
2019-03-17 at 12:25 PM UTCThe prime minister is one ugly bitch too. Fucking gum-disease.
By all means this is a tragedy, but seeing that bitch wearing a shawl just screams muslim appeasement. Solidarity or not that was shitty PR.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
