User Controls
Little girls are tight.
-
2019-03-11 at 2:33 AM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny thanks for agreeing that age of consent is totally fucked up.
girls are fully capable of child bearing naturally at around age 12, sometimes as young as age 9 due to the growth hormones they injected into chickens,
age of consent is arbitrary and illogical.
No 9 year old is ever gonna freely consent to doing it with you tho Benny. So its never gonna happen, you'll just have to be satisfied with rubbing your tiny little willy while looking at sick fuck pedo pix off the darknet.
Have fun ya fucking nonse.
. -
2019-03-11 at 2:39 AM UTC
Originally posted by Narc No 9 year old is ever gonna freely consent to doing it with you tho Benny. So its never gonna happen, you'll just have to be satisfied with rubbing your tiny little willy while looking at sick fuck pedo pix off the darknet.
Have fun ya fucking nonse.
.
I delivered food from a brit pub the other day called Brit's pub. It was a slum dunk looking restaurant, and EVERYTHING ON THE MENU sounded straight gdm fire. I stole a pinch of my cus's food, and it tasted like dreams and cum, hold the cum.
The interior looked exactly like a brit pub, and they have tea time and play lawn bowling on the roof. I want to order from there sometime, but it's high priced. -
2019-03-11 at 2:41 AM UTCAlso, how many times are we gonna rehash this same conversation..everytime sophie makes a post?
Why don't we just have a pedo thread like we do meat thread.? -
2019-03-11 at 2:41 AM UTCWE HAVE A MORAL OBLIGATION TO SEX THE CHILDRENS!!!
-
2019-03-11 at 2:43 AM UTCThats a good point an all, where do you all stand on child porn? Y'all think its preferable for the pedos to be beating off to that shit rather than actually raping kids? Or you hold them just as responsible for the abuse and psychological trauma imposed on the kids to produce the sick fuck images in the first place?
. -
2019-03-11 at 2:46 AM UTCI think being pedo is golden if you don't rape.
It's who you are, so the best thing to do is to love yourself and never be ashamed for being who you is.
That said, please don't rape anyone; I'm talking to everyone except Bill Krozby, because if you're stupid enough to accept his coming onto you, you basically raped yourself anyway. -
2019-03-11 at 2:49 AM UTC
Originally posted by Narc Thats a good point an all, where do you all stand on child porn? Y'all think its preferable for the pedos to be beating off to that shit rather than actually raping kids? Or you hold them just as responsible for the abuse and psychological trauma imposed on the kids to produce the sick fuck images in the first place?
.
I don't see a moral equivalence to beating off to CP and producing it. the idea of "re-victimization" doesn't make sense to me. Someone jerking off in a dark room isn't hurting anyone. It's just repugnant to most. -
2019-03-11 at 2:49 AM UTCHonestly, if I'm on stims, I can smack it to a select few 13/14 y/o's, but otherwise nothing under 15.
There is some kind of special thing about the relative innocence of the youngers. Something that truly makes it a more wholesome session. I honestly feel less dirty using young teen material than I do with 20's somethings fucking for money.
The pedos probably have some kind of rarely expressed gene that mostly died out via natural selection, but alas, it's not completely gone yet.
Who knows, maybe it will become the dominant later. -
2019-03-11 at 3:14 AM UTC
Originally posted by DietPiano Honestly, if I'm on stims, I can smack it to a select few 13/14 y/o's, but otherwise nothing under 15.
There is some kind of special thing about the relative innocence of the youngers. Something that truly makes it a more wholesome session. I honestly feel less dirty using young teen material than I do with 20's somethings fucking for money.
The pedos probably have some kind of rarely expressed gene that mostly died out via natural selection, but alas, it's not completely gone yet.
Who knows, maybe it will become the dominant later.
You know the ephebephiles are a very curious case. They are the pedos that are into kids that are underage yet post puberty. When you consider that any 14 or 15 year old is really barely different physically to any 16 or 17 year old then it becomes obvious that the attraction cannot be about physical attraction and so you can only surmise that the attraction is simply because they are underage, and therefore is only about the forbidden fruit aspect. So with all that considered, by making it illegal and taboo to have sex with kids under a specific age you are in turn making the kids a sexuall target to those who get off on the forbidden. If it had never been prohibited in the first place, those kids would never have been raped or interfered with in the first place.
Most people these days don't even realize that the first age of consent laws were actually designed to prevent pimps from taking advantage of very young teenaged girls. It had nothing to do with the idea of people having sex with young teens as being wrong or disgusting. That ideology came from subsequent generations who had lost sight of the reason the law was imposed, most likely spawned by older women who felt they couldn't compete with prettier younger girls.
. -
2019-03-11 at 3:16 AM UTC
Originally posted by DietPiano I think being pedo is golden if you don't rape.
It's who you are, so the best thing to do is to love yourself and never be ashamed for being who you is.
That said, please don't rape anyone; I'm talking to everyone except Bill Krozby, because if you're stupid enough to accept his coming onto you, you basically raped yourself anyway.
the problem is that these prudes cant fathom that a man-child sexual intercourse can hapen without coercion or threats of violence,
that it can happen due to mutual desire is simply out of their mental grasp because they had been preconditioned and brainwashed into believing such.
they also believe that these children cant give consent and therefore its rape but children also dont understand vaccines and gods and school and dentistry but we force these things into them anyway.
if you want to see genuine child rape, just go to your nearest dentist. all those screams ?
yea, those are cries of rape. -
2019-03-11 at 3:18 AM UTC
Originally posted by DietPiano Spam is expensive and nasty.
I bought OFF BRAND spam one time just to try it, and I threw away after the first pastey nibble. I wanted to vomit.
Like, WHO would buy that? It's not like it's even all that cheap, more expensive than cqnned chicken and beef which is 100 times better.
I knew an old couple in their 90's who were so broke they had to eat cat food. One time, I walked in and they tried to hide it, but they had been making slices with it to put on bread to make sandwiches with it. -
2019-03-11 at 3:22 AM UTC
Originally posted by Narc You know the ephebephiles are a very curious case. They are the pedos that are into kids that are underage yet post puberty. When you consider that any 14 or 15 year old is really barely different physically to any 16 or 17 year old then it becomes obvious that the attraction cannot be about physical attraction and so you can only surmise that the attraction is simply because they are underage, and therefore is only about the forbidden fruit aspect. So with all that considered, by making it illegal and taboo to have sex with kids under a specific age you are in turn making the kids a sexuall target to those who get off on the forbidden. If it had never been prohibited in the first place, those kids would never have been raped or interfered with in the first place.
if this is true, then the reverse is also true, that since girls 14-15 is physically identical to girls 16-17, people who are attracted to 14 year olds are not attracted to them because of their age,
but rather simply because of their bodies that resemble grown women. -
2019-03-11 at 3:24 AM UTCI gotta disagree narc. There's a fair difference in body development between 14 15 and 16. Look at the business parts.
-
2019-03-11 at 3:24 AM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL I knew an old couple in their 90's who were so broke they had to eat cat food. One time, I walked in and they tried to hide it, but they had been making slices with it to put on bread to make sandwiches with it.
at least say discarded cat foods because actual cat foods are more expesive than human foods. -
2019-03-11 at 3:25 AM UTC
-
2019-03-11 at 3:31 AM UTC
-
2019-03-11 at 3:31 AM UTC
-
2019-03-11 at 3:31 AM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny the problem is that these prudes cant fathom that a man-child sexual intercourse can hapen without coercion or threats of violence,
that it can happen due to mutual desire is simply out of their mental grasp because they had been preconditioned and brainwashed into believing such.
they also believe that these children cant give consent and therefore its rape but children also dont understand vaccines and gods and school and dentistry but we force these things into them anyway.
if you want to see genuine child rape, just go to your nearest dentist. all those screams ?
yea, those are cries of rape.
Children don't know what is good for them and lack the experience and sense to make an informed decision, therefore they are incapable of making a decision on something as complex as sexual attraction. Its the same reason why you couldn't allow a child to be left to decide what to eat. A child would end up living on sweets and cakes and junk that was bad for them. If a child was to be left to go off getting into sexual relationships with strange adults it would be disastrous. Even adults struggle with this. Just look at how badly hurt many women can and do get all the time from relationships with asshole men. A child would have no chance defending themselves from that sort of shit. Its the same reason why you wouldn't let a five year old go off crossing busy roads, or doing any other dangerous activities. Its a dangerous world full of dangerous nasty people. Children need to be protected and its a parents job to protect their child. How irresponsible a parent would you be letting your child go off having sexual affairs with god knows who.
You know the idea is fucking ridiculous banny you fucking Muppet. Stop going on about it, its never gonna happen, get used to it, ya fucking freak.
. -
2019-03-11 at 3:39 AM UTCThat just sounds like a personal issue if your kids are that fucking stupid what can you do
Originally posted by Narc Children don't know what is good for them and lack the experience and sense to make an informed decision, therefore they are incapable of making a decision on something as complex as sexual attraction. Its the same reason why you couldn't allow a child to be left to decide what to eat. A child would end up living on sweets and cakes and junk that was bad for them. If a child was to be left to go off getting into sexual relationships with strange adults it would be disastrous. Even adults struggle with this. Just look at how badly hurt many women can and do get all the time from relationships with asshole men. A child would have no chance defending themselves from that sort of shit. Its the same reason why you wouldn't let a five year old go off crossing busy roads, or doing any other dangerous activities. Its a dangerous world full of dangerous nasty people. Children need to be protected and its a parents job to protect their child. How irresponsible a parent would you be letting your child go off having sexual affairs with god knows who.
You know the idea is fucking ridiculous banny you fucking Muppet. Stop going on about it, its never gonna happen, get used to it, ya fucking freak.
. -
2019-03-11 at 3:54 AM UTCWarrants are currently being issued.
All posters in this thread, please surrender all your hard drives containing photographs of lewd acts with minors, and lay down on your kitchen floor in a prone position with your arms crossed behind your backs.
A team of law enforcement officials will be there shortly.
No need to let them in, as they will enter through forcible means.