User Controls
I got hit on by a teller
-
2016-11-17 at 9:17 PM UTC
Originally posted by Malice Your Lanny dick riding mildly irks me. You always defend him. Even when he's going full Marxist you're inordinately polite.
I wonder if this is some form of jealousy…
I wonder if you're projecting. The purpose of my post was not to defend Lanny it was to challenge your reasoning. You are not always right as you seem to think you are, that irks me. -
2016-11-17 at 9:35 PM UTCIt seemed out of character for you to disagree with what I was stating.
Originally posted by Sophie Would you say this is a bad quality in a person?
And you have deduced this wisdom from your interaction with Lanny on the forum?
If a person doesn't have sadistic and/or manipulative tendencies they would not enjoy manipulating or hurting people by doing so.
Well, not really. A recurring thought I've had describing my stance towards relationships/sex is "I'm not playing this goddamn game.", that I want to be outside of standard social dynamics, avoid them as much as possible. An "beta" social position would be an absolute nightmare for me. I'm just saying, Lanny is not what most would consider dominance. He's stated that everyone thinks he's gay. If his appearance were more feminine I'm sure he'd constantly be targeted by twink hunters.
Hyperbolic, but correct. This undoubtedly aligns with the mental profile I have of Lannfred.
What they don't know won't hurt them. I'm suggesting Lanny treat is as a sort of game, a challenge. Lanny does not have the mental constitution for this, though, he would be a guilt ridden faggot. Then again, when the subject of him impersonating a woman came up and how, due to how rare his persona would be for a woman (in terms of quality) and girl on the internet syndrome, there must have been multiple people who developed feelings for him who were emotionally damaged due to his multi-year quasi-psychopathic charade, he was very dismissive of this. It is possible that due to his lack of mental fortitude, the sense of moral superiority/elitism he exudes, he simply engages in avoidance. I mean, whatever works; he could apply the same psychological defense/strategy if he did what I suggested. I for one strive to embrace "evil", placing my life above all else and eroding any aspects of humanity that interfere with true reason, a default mode of action that would perfectly adhere to valuing my well being above all else.
Oh, I just noticed, Lazarus Form Recovery works now! No more ctrl +c'ing while posting just in case it gets lost. -
2016-11-17 at 10:07 PM UTC
Originally posted by Malice Well, not really. A recurring thought I've had describing my stance towards relationships/sex is "I'm not playing this goddamn game.", that I want to be outside of standard social dynamics, avoid them as much as possible. An "beta" social position would be an absolute nightmare for me. I'm just saying, Lanny is not what most would consider dominance. He's stated that everyone thinks he's gay. If his appearance were more feminine I'm sure he'd constantly be targeted by twink hunters.
Ok, i accept that. Still not defending Lanny, but don't you consider him a friend? What you said may have held some truth to it but it seemed mean spirited. Why?
Originally posted by Malice Hyperbolic, but correct. This undoubtedly aligns with the mental profile I have of Lannfred.
I am not sure whether someone's internet persona accurately reflects their real life persona.
Originally posted by Malice What they don't know won't hurt them. I'm suggesting Lanny treat is as a sort of game, a challenge. Lanny does not have the mental constitution for this, though, he would be a guilt ridden faggot.
What would be the purpose of this?
Originally posted by Malice Then again, when the subject of him impersonating a woman came up and how, due to how rare his persona would be for a woman (in terms of quality) and girl on the internet syndrome,
Ha that reminds me, the other day i was bored and went on omegle and i pretended to be a 12/f/cali, so i was talking with this guy and he was like: Aren't you a little young to be on Omegle, what do you do here anyway? So i said, i like to talk to older men, they send me gifts. He was kinda' shocked and said: Why would you do that? So i said: I dunno' i like the attention. Concerned, the guy responded, that's bad attention you know? And where do they send the gifts anyway? So i said: My dad's PO box, he's the county sheriff. I lol'd. So then i said: "This one time i asked my daddy to put the cuffs on me and tie me to the bed, he didn't wanna' do it, he said it was inappropriate. I don't know why, i just wanted to play cops and robbers". Then i lol'd again.
Originally posted by Malice there must have been multiple people who developed feelings for him who were emotionally damaged due to his multi-year quasi-psychopathic charade, he was very dismissive of this.
This is real yo, i once took the troll too far, it was a nice guy too, and he got all attached to the persona, so i felt bad, sent him CP, told him it was me and never spoke to him again lel.
Originally posted by Malice It is possible that due to his lack of mental fortitude, the sense of moral superiority/elitism he exudes, he simply engages in avoidance. I mean, whatever works; he could apply the same psychological defense/strategy if he did what I suggested. I for one strive to embrace "evil", placing my life above all else and eroding any aspects of humanity that interfere with true reason, a default mode of action that would perfectly adhere to valuing my well being above all else.
I think you hinge your identity on being "evil" a little too much. It all seems very edgy to me i am sorry to say. -
2016-11-17 at 11:26 PM UTCEdgy? I literally single handedly resurrected the Klan in the most leftist metropolitan region of the United States.
-
2016-11-17 at 11:28 PM UTCAnd you did it in sandals.
-
2016-11-17 at 11:38 PM UTC
Originally posted by Malice Edgy? I literally single handedly resurrected the Klan in the most leftist metropolitan region of the United States.
That's the only thing you took away from my post? I didn't realize you were this sensitive. -
2016-11-18 at 12:35 AM UTCLanny take this to the fullest extent
Shit Dick. -
2016-11-18 at 4:48 AM UTC
Originally posted by Lanny I really doubt I ever argued no woman has ever liked dominant men though, chiefly because it seems trivially easy to disprove without appeal to romance novels of all things.
Oh my god, you really do still think that, don't you?
Your argument is "I'm sure there are SOME women who like dominance", not "the vast majority of women like dominance".
Is that correct? -
2016-11-18 at 2:06 PM UTCYeah, I don't have any particular belief around what portion of women prefer a dominant partner. Considering you think the covers of romance novels constitute evidence in the matter suggests trying to convince you why that's the reasonable position is a waste of time.
-
2016-11-18 at 2:11 PM UTC
Originally posted by Lanny Yeah, I don't have any particular belief around what portion of women prefer a dominant partner. Considering you think the covers of romance novels constitute evidence in the matter suggests trying to convince you why that's the reasonable position is a waste of time.
Fucking Christ, Lanny. -
2016-11-18 at 2:14 PM UTC
Originally posted by Enter Oh my god, you really do still think that, don't you?
Your argument is "I'm sure there are SOME women who like dominance", not "the vast majority of women like dominance".
Is that correct?
Im gonna speak for lanny here and say that the disction between "some" and "the vast majority" is arbitrary especially considering peoples personal preference and the degrees of dominance a human can display. I would think a number of women like very dominant men. Another number of them like subtlely dominant men. Another number like a variable dominance. I would however argue it it a minority of women who like submissive men. -
2016-11-18 at 2:16 PM UTC
Originally posted by thelittlestnigger Im gonna speak for lanny here and say that the disction between "some" and "the vast majority" is arbitrary especially considering peoples personal preference and the degrees of dominance a human can display. I would think a number of women like very dominant men. Another number of them like subtlely dominant men. Another number like a variable dominance. I would however argue it it a minority of women who like submissive men.
Do you agree with this, Lanny? -
2016-11-18 at 3:33 PM UTCI agree with the point that it's hard to even say what "the vast majority of women like dominance" means, much less come across reasons to accept or reject the proposition.
-
2016-11-18 at 3:36 PM UTCThe fact that you're skirting around this so much just shows what you really think.
-
2016-11-18 at 3:42 PM UTCDO YOU THINK WOMEN ARE SEXUALLY ATTRACTED TO DOMINANT MALES?
YES OR NO. -
2016-11-18 at 3:58 PM UTC
Originally posted by Enter DO YOU THINK WOMEN ARE SEXUALLY ATTRACTED TO DOMINANT MALES?
YES OR NO.
Are you just being silly? -
2016-11-18 at 4 PM UTC
Originally posted by mmQ Are you just being silly?
Yes, but how so? -
2016-11-18 at 4:11 PM UTC
Originally posted by Enter Yes, but how so?
Do you think scuba-divers like Italian food?
Yes or noThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2016-11-18 at 4:13 PM UTC
Originally posted by mmQ Do you think scuba-divers like Italian food?
Yes or no
Holy fuck. I know I called you a liberal cuck in another thread, but I didn't know it was for reals.
Is anyone else reading this? Lanny and mmQ actually think women liking dominant men is just a preference, not the norm. -
2016-11-18 at 4:16 PM UTCmalice are you reading this
