User Controls
ACP Is Not White
-
2019-01-23 at 9:31 PM UTC
-
2019-01-23 at 9:31 PM UTCSoyboy IV: The Flower of Death and The Crystal of Life African Astronaut [the oppositely able-bodied hop-step-and-jump]
-
2019-01-23 at 9:32 PM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny white people has more history of organized genocide than everyine else.
Correction; more recorded history. That does not at all guarantee or even indicate that they have killed more people or committed more acts of genocide. The problem with your logic is that it relies on the story of the holocaust as a main example. A black supremacist actually pointed this out to me, that there's really no way 6 million jedis died there, as there weren't even that many jedis in all of Europe at the time. It is also mathematically impossible to burn that many bodies in that amount of time considering how long it takes to incinerate just one body, and how much fuel is required.
The bolsheviks killed around 60 million people, in comparison. But this is "recorded history" and history is determined by the winners of wars, also. For people living in soviet russia that remember, and even wrote about it, it's an atrocity. The mainstream media however, does not report on this sort of thing. It also tends to ignore genocides of african tribes committed by other african tribes.In the southern region of the Sudan, two million people belonging to various Nilotic peoples including Dinka, Nuer and Shilluk were killed by Sudanese Arabs from the North.[1]
Humans have been around much longer than we've been able to edit wikipedia articles or create history books. To say whites are better at it is ridiculous. Whites are less than 14% of the worlds population, and before european industrial revolution and colonialism, different races, religions and ethnicities throughout the world had access to a lot more people to commit genocide against.
Roughly five and a half million died in the Congo, mainly during the Second Congo War [2] but also in relatively smaller holocausts such as the Ituri conflict and the mass murder of Pygmies known as "Effacer le tableau".
In Uganda, 300 thousand people were murdered during the regime of Idi Amin[3] and 500 thousand during the rule of his successor, Milton Obote.[4] Amin's genocides targeted the Acholi and Lango peoples; these two groups went on to murder other groups (mainly the Baganda) under Obote's regime.[5]
In the early 1970s, over 150 thousand Hutu people were killed by Tutsi people in Burundi by order of General Michel Micombero.[6] Twenty years later, one million Tutsi people were murdered by Hutu people during the 1994 Rwandan genocide.[7]
Figured you would've known the media was fabricating and distorting history by now. -
2019-01-23 at 9:33 PM UTC
-
2019-01-23 at 9:39 PM UTC
War crimes
Arab Janjaweed tribes have been a major player in the conflict.
The BBC first reported on the issue of ethnic cleansing in November 2003, and earlier that year, on March 2003 an administrator from the United States Agency for International Development when giving testimony to congress referred to ethnic cleansing and 'population clearance' which was occurring in Darfur.[8] On April 2004, Human Rights Watch (HRW) released Darfur Destroyed: Ethnic Cleansing by Government and Militia Forces in Western Sudan, a 77 page report compiled by HRW following 25 days spent in the region. The executive director of the African branch of HRW, Peter Takirambudde, stated 'There can be no doubt about the Sudanese government’s culpability in crimes against humanity in Darfur'. The HRW report also documents Janjaweed killings of Muslim religious leaders, desecration of the Koran and the destruction of mosques.[9]
Rape during the Darfur genocide
The use of rape as a tool of genocide has been noted, this crime has been carried out by Sudanese government forces and the Janjaweed ("evil men on horseback")[10] paramilitary groups.[11][12] The actions of the Janjaweed have been described as genocidal rape, with not just women, but children also being raped, as well as infants being bludgeoned to death and the sexual mutilation of victims being commonplace.[13][14]
With the ongoing conflict it has not been possible for interviewers and activists to conduct population-based surveys in Darfur. However, the rapes reported have mostly occurred in non-Arab villages by the Janjaweed with the assistance of the Sudanese military.
These settings in which these attacks occur:
The Janjaweed forces surrounded the village and then attacked girls and women who left the village to gather firewood or water[15];
The Janjaweed forces either went house to house, killing the boys, men and raping the girls and women, or rounded up everyone, bringing them to a central location, where the forces then killed the boys and men and raped the girls and women[15]; and
The Janjaweed forces went to nearby villages or towns, internally displaced person (IDP) camps, or across the border into Chad to rape women and children.[15]
According to Tara Gingerich and Jennifer Leaning, the rape attacks were often carried out in front of others “including husbands, fathers, mothers, and children of the victims, who were forced to watch and prevented from intervening”.[15] This genocidal rape has been committed upon a wide age range that include women of 70 years or older, girls under 10 and visibly pregnant women.
The missing women and girls have been possibly released but have unable to reunite with their families. Besides, they might be held as sex slaves by the Janjaweed forces or have been already killed. In a statement to the UN former secretary general Kofi Annan said “In Darfur, we see whole populations displaced, and their homes destroyed, while rape is used as a deliberate strategy.”[15]
A better thing to look at is who was more humane in their supposed genocides? That's pretty horrific, but not really any worse than what the bolsheviks did. However, combined, and given higher birth-rates, non whites likely committed much more acts of "organized genocide" than whites could have ever done.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Butt_Naked
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bHmumuhLYr0
Don't even get me started on asia and their despots. -
2019-01-23 at 9:54 PM UTCSoyboy IV: The Flower of Death and The Crystal of Life African Astronaut [the oppositely able-bodied hop-step-and-jump]
I might just be ignorant, but I don't believe any of those figures.
Genocide propaganda/blood libel is an old, old way to tarnish your enemies.
If the number is big enough, you can never disprove it. Like I can make an alibi if you accuse me of killing one person. I can't make an alibi if you accuse me of killing a million over the period of years. Obviously I snuck off at some point and did it.
Even if no one knows the name of even one single person who was killed.
"Oh he was in my base killing my dudes." Meanwhile your dudes are still knocking around, being reprehensible as ever. -
2019-01-23 at 10:03 PM UTC
Originally posted by We'reAllBrownNosers Correction; more recorded history. That does not at all guarantee or even indicate that they have killed more people or committed more acts of genocide. The problem with your logic is that it relies on the story of the holocaust as a main example. A black supremacist actually pointed this out to me, that there's really no way 6 million jedis died there, as there weren't even that many jedis in all of Europe at the time. It is also mathematically impossible to burn that many bodies in that amount of time considering how long it takes to incinerate just one body, and how much fuel is required.
The bolsheviks killed around 60 million people, in comparison. But this is "recorded history" and history is determined by the winners of wars, also. For people living in soviet russia that remember, and even wrote about it, it's an atrocity. The mainstream media however, does not report on this sort of thing. It also tends to ignore genocides of african tribes committed by other african tribes.
Humans have been around much longer than we've been able to edit wikipedia articles or create history books. To say whites are better at it is ridiculous. Whites are less than 14% of the worlds population, and before european industrial revolution and colonialism, different races, religions and ethnicities throughout the world had access to a lot more people to commit genocide against.
Figured you would've known the media was fabricating and distorting history by now.
Originally posted by We'reAllBrownNosers A better thing to look at is who was more humane in their supposed genocides? That's pretty horrific, but not really any worse than what the bolsheviks did. However, combined, and given higher birth-rates, non whites likely committed much more acts of "organized genocide" than whites could have ever done.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Butt_Naked
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bHmumuhLYr0
Don't even get me started on asia and their despots.
those are disorganized genocides.
not the same thing. -
2019-01-23 at 10:10 PM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny those are disorganized genocides.
not the same thing.
In what way do you suppose they're disorganized? They sound pretty effective to me. The most organized example I can think of is the hive-mind technology to slowly kill off political dissidents and free thinkers. If you want to blame white people for something blame them for that. It may not have killed many people yet, but it's more diabolical and evil or at least more insidious than most of the other ones combined. -
2019-01-23 at 10:17 PM UTC
Originally posted by We'reAllBrownNosers In what way do you suppose they're disorganized? They sound pretty effective to me. The most organized example I can think of is the hive-mind technology to slowly kill off political dissidents and free thinkers. If you want to blame white people for something blame them for that. It may not have killed many people yet, but it's more diabolical and evil or at least more insidious than most of the other ones combined.
the same differences between organized crimes and disorganized ones. -
2019-01-24 at 3:43 AM UTC
