User Controls
What happened to Sophie/Psychomanthis?
-
2018-12-21 at 1:56 PM UTCPedos are real alphas because they don't let society tell them what to like
-
2018-12-21 at 2:01 PM UTCThat can be said about any criminal.
-
2018-12-21 at 2:05 PM UTCIt's true, serial killers are betas but people who get caught doing white collar crimes are not alpha
-
2018-12-21 at 5:42 PM UTC
-
2018-12-21 at 5:43 PM UTCAnd of course you would know this.
-
2018-12-21 at 5:55 PM UTCgeneral knowledges are generally well known.
-
2018-12-21 at 9:54 PM UTC
Originally posted by Loing We can't do that if you make an absolute declaration, and then try to maintain it by couching it with the "virtually" qualifier. An intellectually honest person wouldn't be trying to eat their cake and have it too in this way.
My absolute declaration is that the kind of hypothetical violence you spoke of earlier is excessive and, more importantly, unnecessary.
There is a clear difference between that scenario and the one you concocted wherein violence is actually necessary.
Intellectual dishonesty is trying to claim that these two scenarios are even remotely comparable:
Originally posted by Loing Those pedo cunts who are like "it's part of who am I am so no, I would t take a pill to–" FUCK YOU MOTHERFUCKER. These are the people I want to take a baseball bat to. You built your identity on your childfucking tendencies, you sick. Mother. Fucker? Bam bam bam, face caved in, society is a little bit safer.
Originally posted by Loing Let's imagine you are currently chained to a wall and are being ass raped by a massive, bloodlusted nigger who has the key. He will rape you every 6 hours, every day, until you die in captivity. There is a baseball bat within your reach that you can swing and end this. Next time. Do you take a bat to his face?
-
2018-12-21 at 10:56 PM UTC
Originally posted by gadzooks My absolute declaration is that the kind of hypothetical violence you spoke of earlier is excessive and, more importantly, unnecessary.
Let's imagine your neighbour is a pedophile and has raped your son in the asshole, and came down his throat. You've called the police and they have investigated him but they never found any evidence because he was real meticulous. He still loves right next to you. Your son grows up and every once in a while you hear him sobbing from his room. You take him to the doctor, he has anal fissures from being raped in the ass by something serrated. You call the police again. They investigate again, and they find no evidence, and this time they tell you that frankly, they're getting a little concerned about you and your son's injuries.
One day when you're watering your yard, you see him drive right by you, slowly, and he stares right at you, with a sneer, until he can't turn any more.
One day you take your son to the park and you see him playing baseball in the distance. He's the catcher. After the game, he stands up, takes off his mask, calls to you.
"Your son can handle a bat, Gadzooks. You wanna come see the tapes?"
He's inviting you to come back to his room, possibly so he can talk shit and blackmail you with tales of your son being impaled on his cock and sucking his balls. You can see a bat you can stealthily take. What do you do?There is a clear difference between that scenario and the one you concocted wherein violence is actually necessary.
Intellectual dishonesty is trying to claim that these two scenarios are even remotely comparable:
They are exactly comparable, but they are incomparable incdehree. That's called reduction and absurdum. You should read about it, it's not a problem. -
2018-12-21 at 11:15 PM UTC
Originally posted by Loing Let's imagine your neighbour is a pedophile and has raped your son in the asshole, and came down his throat. You've called the police and they have investigated him but they never found any evidence because he was real meticulous. He still loves right next to you. Your son grows up and every once in a while you hear him sobbing from his room. You take him to the doctor, he has anal fissures from being raped in the ass by something serrated. You call the police again. They investigate again, and they find no evidence, and this time they tell you that frankly, they're getting a little concerned about you and your son's injuries.
One day when you're watering your yard, you see him drive right by you, slowly, and he stares right at you, with a sneer, until he can't turn any more.
One day you take your son to the park and you see him playing baseball in the distance. He's the catcher. After the game, he stands up, takes off his mask, calls to you.
"Your son can handle a bat, Gadzooks. You wanna come see the tapes?"
He's inviting you to come back to his room, possibly so he can talk shit and blackmail you with tales of your son being impaled on his cock and sucking his balls. You can see a bat you can stealthily take. What do you do?
Again, super contrived hypothetical, and you are trying to use vivid imagery to elicit emotional responses.
In fact, the fact that your imagination goes to such places so easily is kind of disturbing.
But to address the point you're trying to make here...
Originally posted by Loing That's called reduction and absurdum. You should read about it, it's not a problem.
I assume you mean "reductio ad absurdum"...
I can concoct just as many hypothetical scenarios in which one might be tempted to use a baseball bat on someone's face as you can.
If anything, all it's doing is diminishing your point.
There is still a difference between your situation about my perverted neighbor and BOTH scenarios described above.
The following three scenarios are fundamentally different:
1. Wanting to bash someone's face in because they admit to being attracted to children, but have yet to commit any deviant acts.
2. Defending yourself when you're being held captive and your only recourse is to use a bat.
3. Getting revenge against the perverted neighbor because the criminal justice system has failed.
#1 is absolutely unnecessary.
#2 is clearly necessary.
#3 is not necessary, but perhaps somewhat understandable.
These are three different scenarios that do not correlate at all. -
2018-12-22 at 9:52 AM UTC
Originally posted by gadzooks Again, super contrived hypothetical, and you are trying to use vivid imagery to elicit emotional responses.
In fact, the fact that your imagination goes to such places so easily is kind of disturbing.
Not at all. Again, I'm trying to specifically isolate your moral principles with a reduction as absurdum. You can't just cry your way out of a valid point. Again, we're not going to have a discussion if you insist on a shit absolute with no justification.But to address the point you're trying to make here…
I assume you mean "reductio ad absurdum"…
Yes it's an autocorrect typo.I can concoct just as many hypothetical scenarios in which one might be tempted to use a baseball bat on someone's face as you can.
If anything, all it's doing is diminishing your point.
Tell me how.There is still a difference between your situation about my perverted neighbor and BOTH scenarios described above.
Of course there is. But you have to show that it is a difference of kind, or if in fact it is a difference of degree, why you draw the line wherever you draw it.3. Getting revenge against the perverted neighbor because the criminal justice system has failed.
#1 is absolutely unnecessary.
#2 is clearly necessary.
#3 is not necessary, but perhaps somewhat understandable.
These are three different scenarios that do not correlate at all.
I specifically framed the scenario so there would be a persistent and imminent but non-lethal threat of your child getting raped by the neighbor, and the authorities refuse to protect you from it. -
2018-12-22 at 10:03 AM UTCShut up loing you shitty alt cuck. fuck you didn't read suck my balls bitch
-
2018-12-22 at 10:46 AM UTC
-
2018-12-22 at 10:48 AM UTC
-
2018-12-22 at 10:59 AM UTC
-
2018-12-22 at 11 AM UTC
-
2018-12-22 at 9:42 PM UTC
-
2018-12-22 at 9:46 PM UTCYou spelled butch wrong.
-
2018-12-22 at 10:17 PM UTC
Originally posted by Loing I specifically framed the scenario so there would be a persistent and imminent but non-lethal threat of your child getting raped by the neighbor, and the authorities refuse to protect you from it.
Ok, I missed the implication that he was going to continue.
I thought he was done.
Then, yeah, sure, whatever, in that particular scenario, I might resort to lethal violence.
I still maintain that it is fundamentally different from your first scenario though. -
2018-12-22 at 11:53 PM UTCI am wondering too where Sophie has been.
As for the posts going on and on about him being a disgusting pedo, well, I believe when you begin isolating pedophiles, to the point they can't come out in the open to say they have a problem and get help, then you have those pedos hiding in the shadows, and more likely to abuse a child at some point.
I'm not really speaking on Sophie's case here, just in general. It's a psychiatric disorder, and those people need help, but most the time, it would turn into a witch hunt if a person so much as admitted to being a hebephile, much less attracted to a younger demographic, and that's assuming the person just had the THOUGHTS and ATTRACTION, and never harmed a child. GRanted, if you cross that line, and harm a child, I do believe you need to serve time, but more than being punished, one needs to get help while serving, and get rehabilitation, and ways to curb their desires, and express themselves in a healthy way that won't harm children. The problem is, is that most the time, there is no psychiatric help whatsoever when they serve their time, so when they get out, they are pretty much set up on a registry, which pretty much guarantees they won't be able to get employment, and very much limits their housing situations, and also, they're pretty much gonna be ostracized from society, which puts them at an even higher risk of re-offending because hey... what do they really have to lose at that point? THey have no support systems in place. However you feel emotionally, the way shit is done, at least in the US, is causing more danger for children then it protects them. Emotions, which I get, can get high, considering people who have, or have a loved one who was harmed by a pedophile, but that serves no good to society. We need help for these people, with more inclusion, less fear to come out and tell a shrink "Hey, I got a problem" and thus higher chance to get help, and never act on those urges. As it is now, a pedo wouldn't tell another soul, unless that soul was another pedo about their desires BECAUSE of the repercussions of just admitting a desire, not even a crime.
Anyway... Stick that in your pipe and smoke it.
and I hope Sophie is doing alright. I loves dat nigga. -
2018-12-23 at 12:13 AM UTC
Originally posted by hydromorphone I am wondering too where Sophie has been.
As for the posts going on and on about him being a disgusting pedo, well, I believe when you begin isolating pedophiles, to the point they can't come out in the open to say they have a problem and get help, then you have those pedos hiding in the shadows, and more likely to abuse a child at some point.
I'm not really speaking on Sophie's case here, just in general. It's a psychiatric disorder, and those people need help, but most the time, it would turn into a witch hunt if a person so much as admitted to being a hebephile, much less attracted to a younger demographic, and that's assuming the person just had the THOUGHTS and ATTRACTION, and never harmed a child. GRanted, if you cross that line, and harm a child, I do believe you need to serve time, but more than being punished, one needs to get help while serving, and get rehabilitation, and ways to curb their desires, and express themselves in a healthy way that won't harm children. The problem is, is that most the time, there is no psychiatric help whatsoever when they serve their time, so when they get out, they are pretty much set up on a registry, which pretty much guarantees they won't be able to get employment, and very much limits their housing situations, and also, they're pretty much gonna be ostracized from society, which puts them at an even higher risk of re-offending because hey… what do they really have to lose at that point? THey have no support systems in place. However you feel emotionally, the way shit is done, at least in the US, is causing more danger for children then it protects them. Emotions, which I get, can get high, considering people who have, or have a loved one who was harmed by a pedophile, but that serves no good to society. We need help for these people, with more inclusion, less fear to come out and tell a shrink "Hey, I got a problem" and thus higher chance to get help, and never act on those urges. As it is now, a pedo wouldn't tell another soul, unless that soul was another pedo about their desires BECAUSE of the repercussions of just admitting a desire, not even a crime.
Anyway… Stick that in your pipe and smoke it.
and I hope Sophie is doing alright. I loves dat nigga.
Agreed big time. The way I see it is the system is happy to have it like this. They create these monsters to scare the shit out of anyone who's a parent then sells them protection from the very threat the system created.
Like I keep saying they control a mass population by making everyone believe there are dangers nobody can protect themselves from yet they can offer you protection. Just keep paying your taxes and doing what you are told and our hero cops will keep you safe.
Like I said the other day when the govt policy doesn't make sense, consider that factor and suddenly it makes perfect sense.
The sickest part is that for most pedos its the forbidden fruit that tastes much sweeter.
But that means that making it illegal to fuck kids is just causing a whole bunch of guys to now wanna fuck kids.
But they don't give a fuck that your kids get raped or even murdered. Just as long as they get to control you with your own fear.
These people are the sickest criminals of all. Yet y'all going on happy to call them your leaders and trusting that shit. People seriously need to wake the fuck up.
.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
