2018-12-23 at 1:19 AM UTC
It's scummy, but hardly the scummiest thing in SF politics, I tell you what.
Breed doesn't have any real power, she got into office but without the appropriate support from special interest groups to do anything significant.
2018-12-23 at 1:35 AM UTC
Would you vote for Calexit?
2018-12-23 at 9:18 AM UTC
Honestly? I'm kinda down with it. The courts need to have a more reasonable interpretation of events that took place while intoxicated or dealing with drug addiction. Addiction is - more or less - just self-inflicted diminished capacity.
2018-12-23 at 10:38 AM UTC
So what's the reasonable interpretation of throwing someone out of a car on a freeway while allegedly intoxicated or dealing with drug addiction? If a drunk person drives and gets into a collision they may have had a diminished capacity to drive and couldn't have avoided it since they were drunk, but they're still responsible for putting themselves in that situation in the first place.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2018-12-23 at 10:41 AM UTC
aldra
JIDF Controlled Opposition
Under the influence of drugs or alcohol should not be a defence unless you can prove that somebody drugged you.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2018-12-23 at 11:22 AM UTC
Poor OP, did the brown man hurt you?
Want me to beat him up for you? Or should I tell mom and dad?
2018-12-23 at 11:50 AM UTC
Yes, I refuse to share my disfigured pedophile Chinese gimp with another man
2018-12-23 at 11:55 AM UTC
Originally posted by Lanny
So what's the reasonable interpretation of throwing someone out of a car on a freeway while allegedly intoxicated or dealing with drug addiction? If a drunk person drives and gets into a collision they may have had a diminished capacity to drive and couldn't have avoided it since they were drunk, but they're still responsible for putting themselves in that situation in the first place.
Don't get me wrong, I don't really disagree. I believe that people are responsible for ALL of their actions. There's honestly a pretty specific reason for my position on this which relates to my own experiences in court, but like, suffice it to say: while they might be responsible for making themselves that way, that doesn't mean people who took drugs understood that they'd end up with that frame of mind. Which fundamentally changes the nature of the offence: it's the difference between murder and manslaughter, or criminal negligence. Ya dig? It was negligent of them to take drugs in the first place, sure, but their baseline frame of mind likely differs substantially from the way they'd be thinking on drugs. That's kinda the point of drugs, even?
I dunno. Ignore me.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2018-12-23 at 11:59 AM UTC
aldra
JIDF Controlled Opposition
Originally posted by Technologist
Poor OP, did the brown man hurt you?
Want me to beat him up for you?
yes pls
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2018-12-23 at 12:25 PM UTC
Originally posted by Lanny
Yes, I refuse to share my disfigured pedophile Chinese gimp with another man
arent you a communist ?
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
