User Controls

Lanny_loves = faggots

  1. Lanny Bird of Courage
    I know you're pathetic, and that's enough.
  2. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Lanny I know you're pathetic, and that's enough.

    If it were up to you, the threads would have two or three posts in them with three or four users in them, if that. I do the heavy lifting, not you.
  3. Originally posted by -SpectraL Well, technically, even if the newer browsers block it, it's still a fork bomb. Just because a key doesn't open a lock doesn't mean it's not a key.

    And Yomoma ZokLock and Yomoma Software Co. are both fictional entities I created in 2002.

    watching spectral gives me the courage to lie in the face of adversity.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  4. Soyboy III: The Quest for 911 Truth Tuskegee Airman [oppositely expose the hypermetropia]
    Originally posted by -SpectraL Just because a key doesn't open a lock doesn't mean it's not a key.

    Unintentionally inspirational.
  5. Lanny Bird of Courage
    Originally posted by -SpectraL If it were up to you, the threads would have two or three posts in them with three or four users in them, if that. I do the heavy lifting, not you.

    It is up to me. I tolerate your lying solely because only allowing "true" content is a slippery slope.
  6. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Lanny It is up to me. I tolerate your lying solely because only allowing "true" content is a slippery slope.

    Or else you would have banned me for 999 years, right? Déjà vu.
  7. Soyboy III: The Quest for 911 Truth Tuskegee Airman [oppositely expose the hypermetropia]
    Originally posted by -SpectraL Or else you would have banned me for 999 years, right? Déjà vu.

    And what would be wrong with that?
  8. Ghost Black Hole
    free speech forum guys!

    hurr durr 999 years bans!

    totse spirit!

    fucking retards kill yourselves.
  9. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by MORALLY SUPERIOR BEING III: The Quest for 911 Truth And what would be wrong with that?

    It wouldn't be very nice, for starters.
  10. Soyboy III: The Quest for 911 Truth Tuskegee Airman [oppositely expose the hypermetropia]
    Originally posted by -SpectraL It wouldn't be very nice, for starters.

    Yeah?

    What would be the main couse?

    Cos starters sounds pretty delicious.

    Maybe getting rid of the nutjobs is a net benefit to all the rest of us?

    Why not?
  11. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by MORALLY SUPERIOR BEING III: The Quest for 911 Truth Maybe getting rid of the nutjobs is a net benefit to all the rest of us?

    Getting rid of the nutjobs would kill this place. Its life blood is nutjobs. You're one, too, kid. Don't fool yourself.
  12. GGG victim of incest [my veinlike two-fold aepyornidae]
    Originally posted by Lanny It is up to me. I tolerate your lying solely because only allowing "true" content is a slippery slope.

    You should ban spectraL on principle.
  13. gadzooks Dark Matter [keratinize my mild-tasting blossoming]
    Originally posted by GGG You should ban spectraL on principle.

    Ok, my man, the slippery slope being referred to is very real, and, although I like you, of course, there has been at least one thread made requesting YOUR banning...

    So, I would really rethink the whole idea of banning anyone because they are unpopular.

    Lanny stays objective, and that's what makes NIS a part of the Totse/Zoklet family of Internet forums.

    It's like the company mission statement, basically. The company culture - what separates us from most other discussion forums - is the objectivity exercised in moderating the place.

    There, of course, are rules, and that's 100% necessary, but it's like a minarchic / libertarian kinda thing here, and, despite what your personal politics might be, that is what works perfectly for the Totse/Zoklet/NIS tradition.
  14. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by gadzooks Ok, my man, the slippery slope being referred to is very real, and, although I like you, of course, there has been at least one thread made requesting YOUR banning…

    So, I would really rethink the whole idea of banning anyone because they are unpopular.

    Lanny stays objective, and that's what makes NIS a part of the Totse/Zoklet family of Internet forums.

    It's like the company mission statement, basically. The company culture - what separates us from most other discussion forums - is the objectivity exercised in moderating the place.

    There, of course, are rules, and that's 100% necessary, but it's like a minarchic / libertarian kinda thing here, and, despite what your personal politics might be, that is what works perfectly for the Totse/Zoklet/NIS tradition.

    But Lanny has encroached on that principle recently, by going after users he just doesn't personally like. Kr0z is one good example. Benny is another. I could name off at least 10 others. So, it's not as "perfect" as one might like to believe.
  15. gadzooks Dark Matter [keratinize my mild-tasting blossoming]
    Originally posted by -SpectraL But Lanny has encroached on that principle recently, by going after users he just doesn't personally like. Kr0z is one good example. Benny is another. I could name off at least 10 others. So, it's not as "perfect" as one might like to believe.

    I want to give you the benefit of the doubt on this.

    But it feels like I'm about to get sucked into some kind of huge dramatic feud.

    Admittedly, though, I do not have a summary of all the reasons Lanny has given for bans (although, with my data collecting project I started some weeks ago, it wouldn't be too much extra code to add a search for ban info* that I could collate).

    * Lanny, again, when I scrape this site for data, I always abide by a 1 request per second limit, and I make sure that it won't be some endlessly recursive thing, and will usually only result in a few thousand requests.
  16. GGG victim of incest [my veinlike two-fold aepyornidae]
    Originally posted by gadzooks Ok, my man, the slippery slope being referred to is very real, and, although I like you, of course, there has been at least one thread made requesting YOUR banning…

    So, I would really rethink the whole idea of banning anyone because they are unpopular.

    Lanny stays objective, and that's what makes NIS a part of the Totse/Zoklet family of Internet forums.

    It's like the company mission statement, basically. The company culture - what separates us from most other discussion forums - is the objectivity exercised in moderating the place.

    There, of course, are rules, and that's 100% necessary, but it's like a minarchic / libertarian kinda thing here, and, despite what your personal politics might be, that is what works perfectly for the Totse/Zoklet/NIS tradition.

    I only joke. Only reason anyone should get banned imo is for obnoxiously illegal activity (like child porn) or extensive spamming.
  17. Superhero Houston
    PM me on Facebook.
  18. gadzooks Dark Matter [keratinize my mild-tasting blossoming]
    Originally posted by Superhero PM me on Facebook.

    What's a Facebook?

    (For real though, I deleted my Facebook account in like... 2007).
  19. Superhero Houston
    Bro Pm me how it works, i checked your email address in facebook but theres nothing but mcdonald
  20. gadzooks Dark Matter [keratinize my mild-tasting blossoming]
    Originally posted by Superhero Bro Pm me how it works, i checked your email address in facebook but theres nothing but mcdonald

    Dude wtf? I used to work at McDonalds... back in 2007, when I deleted Facebook, so that must be it.

    PM you how what works?
Jump to Top