User Controls
Why do handsome and well tanned individuals feel like they're entitled to enter our country for free?
-
2018-10-31 at 10:16 PM UTC
Originally posted by gadzooks I agree.
What we have here is system of nepotism run amok. One powerful person scratches the back of another, and soon you have a full-fledged Furry-esque orgy of yiffing and rampant debauchery.
What's the solution though? You can't just overthrow an entire furpile.
I'm not even being rhetorical here, either, I really do contemplate the solution to a centuries-old, systemic issue.
Giant walls and mass deportations aren't gonna help, but then again, what progress has the titular 'progressive' party made thus far?
To me, politics seems completely awash.
I'm reserving tickets for the upcoming singularity, personally.
I posted the solution months ago
https://niggasin.space/thread/22646?p=6#post-386951
. -
2018-10-31 at 10:36 PM UTC
Originally posted by Narc But nobody should take more than they could ever use tho? That's where the problems start when greedy individuals earn more than they could ever use then just continue earning, usually at a huge rate. While there are millions of others unable to get the opportunity to earn barely enough to eat, clothe and house themselves.
What's wrong with taking early retirement once you've reached say the 200 million mark? Then you've got more than you'll ever need and now some others get the opportunity to have a piece of the action.
.
How about those people be made to understand that spreading it around is in their own best interest? -
2018-10-31 at 10:44 PM UTCIf I had enough land, I'd host all of them. We'd spend a few weeks putting together signs for protest and then I'd lead the caravan to the White House.
-
2018-10-31 at 11:05 PM UTC
Originally posted by PhD in Condom Mechanics How about those people be made to understand that spreading it around is in their own best interest?
They don't need to spread it around if they weren't so fucking greedy in the first place because everyone would then have the opportunity to earn a living.
But its in taking it all for themselves and then having others rely on their hndouts that gives them their power. That's why they do it.
. -
2018-10-31 at 11:12 PM UTC
Originally posted by playingindirt lolz if you run a red light and don't get caught does that not mean you didn't break the law and you're not a criminal? you're just as much as a criminal as anyone that breaks the law even if you don't get caught. like drug lords that don't get caught are still criminals.
trump isn't trying. he is a very good front man for a bunch of cronies he chose to help make him and them get richer. he is stirring up and manipulating the hearts and fears of good men that want so desperately to believe in the good of our nation. americans are fed up and want to do and believe in what's good for our nation. what appears to give them hope is a lie. trump is a very evil man. while he has americans attention his cronies are dismantling our rights and programs that help us so they can get richer.
americans needs do not exist in our politicians. big money is running the show. ignoring scientists about how we are destroying our environment and our future and our childrens future is big money. big money is made by corporations pretending to be in favor of helping the american people. it is just big profits that they don't share with us. wages don't increase, the big taxes breaks will only trickle down ending in american taxpayers holding the bag,and the dismantling of programs to appear to americans as taxes not going to waste.
have you even bothered to read the plans and design for the federal budget? It is very carefully worded to give people the impression that people can work are given an insensitive to find jobs so peoples taxes aren't wasted on moochers. all the while our most vulnerable americans are getting the boot right under our very noses. it will destroy them. meanwhile people wanna believe it must be a mistake and it's all basically for the good of our nation.
destroying the injured or vulnerable americans is completely opposite of what some programs are designed for. when people get hurt on the job or get too old and frail to work after they've paid into the system these programs won't work for them or if healing will take time, if they get cancer, yada yada.
If your moral compass doesn't tell you it's not okay to sacrifice vulnerable americans in the process of reforming programs designed to help us all then you are part of the problem and have the same affliction the politicians have.
there are many very fine pinned details called reforms that are very carefully designed to screw american taxpayers of their rights, their taxes, their benefits and their way of life.
Gotta start somewhere, and I think President Trump is doing a great job so far. -
2018-11-01 at 1:12 AM UTC
Originally posted by Narc But nobody should take more than they could ever use tho? That's where the problems start when greedy individuals earn more than they could ever use then just continue earning, usually at a huge rate. While there are millions of others unable to get the opportunity to earn barely enough to eat, clothe and house themselves.
What's wrong with taking early retirement once you've reached say the 200 million mark? Then you've got more than you'll ever need and now some others get the opportunity to have a piece of the action.
I don't think your conception here is too far off from my own.
Nobody should be a denied a piece of the proverbial American pie because they are being blocked at all possible entries by the super-wealthy.
Certain risk and trade-off factors play an important role in how one's earning capacity is determined. For example, entrepreneurial risk implies that many entrepreneurs will fail, and so those that do succeed are highly rewarded as an incentive to contribute to more entrepreneurial ventures.
And then there are factors like lost-wages trade-off for highly educated individuals and public servants, who either spent many years in training (when they could have been earning some kind of salary), or chose to serve the public good by being social workers, teachers, and public health care and public legal defense advocates.
My point is just that, a lot of people who are "anti-capitalism" tend to oversimplify matters such as these.
So to summarize, I am pro-capitalism in the sense that I believe that people should be appropriately compensated for their contributions to society, as well as any risks they took in doing so, or sacrifices they made to get there.
And on the other hand, I am anti-capitalism in the sense that full-blown, laissez faire capitalism run amok is simply unsustainable, at least not ethically, since wealth will always wind up concentrated much too highly in some places, and become completely deprived from most others.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2018-11-01 at 1:15 AM UTCWhen your IQ is 75, some 115 IQ jedi telling you what to do sounds like literally God.
-
2018-11-01 at 2:11 AM UTC
Originally posted by Archer513 It doesn’t matter why.
We livin nigga rich on credit cards…beyond broke
Lol, this is like a guy who blows his ample wages on sports betting or something every payday and is like "it doesn't matter why I'm poor lol, I should get a welfare benefit". The reason we have a deficit and the reason we have refugees matters a lot.
Originally posted by Number13 But you would have china entering the country, via parachute and landing craft, here to collect the debt mother fuckers.
Not really. Ignoring the fact that we could defend a borders for a fraction of what our military spending is, China doesn't stand to gain from attacking their biggest market and debtor.
Originally posted by Archer513 Another problem with this is that the United States IS nato and the u.n.
The world is at peace because of the amount of money we (Americans) spend on military. The Cold War was won by outspending. Period. America is the nigga with the big stick.
Which is why trump tells those laughable organizations to eat a bag of dicks.
There are countries that live without fear and have national healthcare and college because they don’t pay shit on defense.
As mentioned, the world is not at peace. We probably have our hands in most ongoing conflicts today and our need to dispose of all the military supplies we blow a tremendous amount of our budget on is a pretty direct cause of many of the wars we find ourselves in. -
2018-11-01 at 5:40 AM UTC
-
2018-11-01 at 6:03 AM UTC
-
2018-11-01 at 6:19 AM UTCI wonder if everyone can live in the same country??
-
2018-11-01 at 6:20 AM UTC
Originally posted by Archer513 Another problem with this is that the United States IS nato and the u.n.
The world is at peace because of the amount of money we (Americans) spend on military. The Cold War was won by outspending. Period. America is the nigga with the big stick.
Which is why trump tells those laughable organizations to eat a bag of dicks.
There are countries that live without fear and have national healthcare and college because they don’t pay shit on defense.
literally everything in this post is wrong -
2018-11-01 at 6:21 AM UTCIf ppl could act right, possibly.
-
2018-11-01 at 6:31 AM UTC
-
2018-11-01 at 6:45 AM UTC
-
2018-11-01 at 6:48 AM UTChey hikie show a picture of your bitchass self, oh wait you won't because you're a big pussssssay
-
2018-11-01 at 7:15 AM UTCWow krohz you are the biggest fag on this whole site, row some skin you dumb taco nigger.
-
2018-11-01 at 11:27 AM UTC
Originally posted by Lanny Not really. Ignoring the fact that we could defend a borders for a fraction of what our military spending is, China doesn't stand to gain from attacking their biggest market and debtor.
Your borders maybe yeah, against mexico or south american countries but not against china, there's just too many of them, you think that if they went to war they wouldn't ally with other countries in the region? NK runs on chinese oil and weapons so they're basically another arm already, russia would wanna get in if only just to say they planted their nuts on us soil.
Right now there might be a surplus of arms and munitions but that'd only last for a while, even without a war to fight in.
And china could gain a lot, taking a country doesn't mean exterminating the populace so they'd keep their market, gain a large, wealthy, taxbase and most importantly close a debt that'll never be paid anyway.
Only thing stopping this is mutual defence(for eu countries/nato) and nukes, us has enough to decimate the world near enough and destroy any country that mounts a force against it, but it costs to keep them operational, and with these talks about pulling out of the non-proliferation treaty then it's going to cost a lot lot more. -
2018-11-01 at 11:34 AM UTC
Originally posted by Number13 Your borders maybe yeah, against mexico or south american countries but not against china, there's just too many of them, you think that if they went to war they wouldn't ally with other countries in the region? NK runs on chinese oil and weapons so they're basically another arm already, russia would wanna get in if only just to say they planted their nuts on us soil.
Right now there might be a surplus of arms and munitions but that'd only last for a while, even without a war to fight in.
And china could gain a lot, taking a country doesn't mean exterminating the populace so they'd keep their market, gain a large, wealthy, taxbase and most importantly close a debt that'll never be paid anyway.
Only thing stopping this is mutual defence(for eu countries/nato) and nukes, us has enough to decimate the world near enough and destroy any country that mounts a force against it, but it costs to keep them operational, and with these talks about pulling out of the non-proliferation treaty then it's going to cost a lot lot more.
The US has no borders with China, you dildo. Pretty please kill yourself, you are stupid as fuck. There are two massive oceans son either side of the US and two friendly, easy to protect borders to the north and south. There is zero threat of a mainland invasion of the US. Huff pentobarbital. -
2018-11-01 at 11:56 AM UTC
Originally posted by PhD in Condom Mechanics The US has no borders with China, you dildo. Pretty please kill yourself, you are stupid as fuck. There are two massive oceans son either side of the US and two friendly, easy to protect borders to the north and south. There is zero threat of a mainland invasion of the US. Huff pentobarbital.
that's how the Whitehouse never burned down
