User Controls
American hegemony.
-
2018-10-23 at 12:29 PM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny all laws are the whims and fancies of the mob majority.
and no, utilizing guns to enable individual lawlessness and disorder is anarchy, but using guns to vote for and enforce a collective single goal is real democracy.
Democracy is mob rule so your correct. Which is why we are a republic. -
2018-10-23 at 5:10 PM UTC
-
2018-10-23 at 7:47 PM UTC
-
2018-10-23 at 8:09 PM UTC
-
2018-10-24 at 2:42 AM UTC
-
2018-10-24 at 3:06 AM UTC
Originally posted by Jυicebox https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_concentration_camps
fake kike propaganda -
2018-10-24 at 3:07 AM UTC
-
2018-10-24 at 6 PM UTCThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2019-02-26 at 9:49 AM UTC
Originally posted by Rizzo in a box Yes, the petrodollar as we know it is dead. America is positioning itself to still control as much energy as possible. I don't know why you think fracking is a ponzi scheme, maybe you have some information I don't. What do you think about natural gas?
https://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/Wall-Street-Loses-Faith-In-Shale.htmlShale wells suffer from precipitous decline rates, with as much as three quarters of a well’s total lifetime production coming out in the first year or two. After an initial burst of output, shale wells enter a steep decline.
Of course, this has been known since the beginning and Wall Street has long been fully aware. But major investors hoped that shale companies would scale up, achieve efficiencies and lower breakeven prices to the point that they could turn a profit.
However, that has not been the case. While there are some drillers that are profitable, taken as a whole the industry has been cash flow negative essentially since its beginning in the mid-2000s. For instance, the IEA estimates that the shale industry posted cumulative negative free cash flow of over $200 billion between 2010 and 2014.Rystad finds that over half of the total debt pile for the 33 companies it analyzed is due within the next seven years. Ultimately, the industry may have to erase $4 billion in promised dividend payments.
-
2019-02-26 at 10:02 AM UTCPFFFFT
HAVE IT. HAVE US -
2019-02-27 at 4:57 AM UTC
Originally posted by aldra https://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/Wall-Street-Loses-Faith-In-Shale.html
correct me if I'm wrong, but this is mostly saying that most shale is shit, therefore it all is? lots of those companies do go to shit but the ones that stick around seem to figure things out. idk. am I really able to look into the fucking details of this shit and determine whether any of this shit even makes sense? I don't know fucking maybe. is oil even real? probably all alien cum. -
2019-02-27 at 5 AM UTCyou're wrong.
-
2019-02-27 at 5:01 AM UTC
-
2019-02-27 at 5:02 AM UTC
-
2019-02-27 at 5:14 AM UTCtime to liquidate some assets.
-
2019-02-27 at 5:50 AM UTC
Originally posted by Rizzo in a box correct me if I'm wrong, but this is mostly saying that most shale is shit, therefore it all is? lots of those companies do go to shit but the ones that stick around seem to figure things out. idk. am I really able to look into the fucking details of this shit and determine whether any of this shit even makes sense? I don't know fucking maybe. is oil even real? probably all alien cum.
Basically shale is high-cost low-yield, but was treated as a miraculous new source of oil - wells have been drying up much faster than the data given to investors indicates.
Some companies have been able to turn a profit, but it appears to only be the really big ones - the ones that are able to use scale to cut operations costs and run large numbers of operations at once, and are able to absorb costs and shortcomings by spreading them among their other ventures.
I suspect that even the bigger companies are running at a loss, but are hiding it among their other costs in order to draw in investors. -
2019-02-27 at 5:51 AM UTC
Originally posted by aldra Basically shale is high-cost low-yield, but was treated as a miraculous new source of oil - wells have been drying up much faster than the data given to investors indicates.
Some companies have been able to turn a profit, but it appears to only be the really big ones - the ones that are able to use scale to cut operations costs and run large numbers of operations at once, and are able to absorb costs and shortcomings by spreading them among their other ventures.
I suspect that even the bigger companies are running at a loss, but are hiding it among their other costs in order to draw in investors.
yeah you're not wrong but that's how literally the rest of the economy runs so im not sure how to take that. -
2019-02-27 at 6:21 AM UTC
