Poor people are more productive

1. 2016-04-06 at 3:22 AM UTC

   #1
   

   Dissociator African Astronaut
   Yeah, being poor sucks. But dealing with all the fucking stress and limiting your purchases and shit is all fucking life experience and how to deal with bad situations. No dishwasher? Do the dishes yourself, yeah its gruntwork, but its work. Rich people sitting on their ass all day would get fucking destroyed in prison, anal annihilation etc
   
   plus when youre poor you can sleep on the floor
   which is fucking better than sleeping on a seely posturpedic fuckin mattress crib bed stack
   sleeping on the floor is good for your back
   and plus its easier to carpet surf for crack
   
   
   I carpet surfed on bk-2cb once. Just laying on the carpet spazzing out like a spastic buzzing unhuman non-socialite.
   cowabunga
2. 2016-04-06 at 3:27 AM UTC

   #2
   

   aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
   I sometimes wonder if there's a hard and fast income/value threshold that you need to be a sociopath to break through
3. 2016-04-06 at 3:40 AM UTC

   #3
   The Self Taught Man Black Hole
   what do you mean?
4. 2016-04-06 at 4:04 AM UTC

   #4
   The Self Taught Man Black Hole

   I sometimes wonder if there's a hard and fast income/value threshold that you need to be a sociopath to break through

   
   50 cents a day
5. 2016-04-06 at 4:07 AM UTC

   #5
   

   aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
   I didn't think I was a sociopath though, maybe I was wrong
6. 2016-04-06 at 6:01 AM UTC

   #6
   Malice Naturally Camouflaged

   I sometimes wonder if there's a hard and fast income/value threshold that you need to be a sociopath to break through

   
   
   Jaded. Let's be honest, users here tend to have certain characteristics, life experiences.
   
   
   
   
   The long-term poor are poor for a good reason. You should look into Bryan Caplan's writing on adoption studies and hereditarianism. In the long run, on average, your parents make no impact on your outcomes. IIRC a study comparing adopted Koreans showed than after age 30, on average, those adopted into the poorest households made just as much as those from the richest.
   
   Of course people are going to be hesitant, highly adverse, to accepting that they or their children, relatives, are genetically inferior and responsible for their own failures.
7. 2016-04-06 at 7:30 AM UTC

   #7
   The Self Taught Man Black Hole

   Jaded. Let's be honest, users here tend to have certain characteristics, life experiences.
   
   
   
   
   The long-term poor are poor for a good reason. You should look into Bryan Caplan's writing on adoption studies and hereditarianism. In the long run, on average, your parents make no impact on your outcomes. IIRC a study comparing adopted Koreans showed than after age 30, on average, those adopted into the poorest households made just as much as those from the richest.
   
   Of course people are going to be hesitant, highly adverse, to accepting that they or their children, relatives, are genetically inferior and responsible for their own failures.

   
   You have Autism.
8. 2016-04-06 at 8:09 AM UTC

   #8
   Malice Naturally Camouflaged
   You have so many things even my enhanced autistic memory can't keep track of them.
9. 2016-04-08 at 10:34 PM UTC

   #9
   The Self Taught Man Black Hole
   You are an enlightened and insightful scholar Mr.Roshambo
10. 2016-04-09 at 2:16 AM UTC

    #10
    

    Lanny Bird of Courage

    Of course people are going to be hesitant, highly adverse, to accepting that they or their children, relatives, are genetically inferior and responsible for their own failures.

    
    Those seem like opposite conclusions
11. 2016-04-09 at 10:33 AM UTC

    #11
    

    kroz weak whyte, frothy cuck, and former twink
    I'm probably the biggest sociopath here, plus I like to play with knives