User Controls
Trump's new re-election campaign strategy
-
2018-09-19 at 6:52 AM UTC
-
2018-09-19 at 9:18 AM UTCOMG Trump supporters have no brains
-
2018-09-19 at 7:13 PM UTC
Originally posted by Rizzo in a box RAISE FUCKING WAGES YOU FUCKING CUCK WHAT THE FUCK DO YOU THINK
im not mad, I just wish murder was legal
looll. you illeterate fucking retard.
like infinity explained, unemployment rate is in its negative because there are more jobs available than there are people who are able to work.
raising wages WONT MAGICALLY MAKE PEOPLE APPEAR OUT OF THIN AIR TO FILL THESE VACANCIES.
i am mad, becos darwinism is taking too long to weed retards like you out. -
2018-09-19 at 7:29 PM UTC
-
2018-09-19 at 7:41 PM UTCTrumps reelection strat is the same as when he got elected the first time: wait for that fat dnc fumble, jump on it, then run like hell. He blows a lot of money on election campaigns when his opponents do all the hard work for him.
-
2018-09-19 at 9:30 PM UTC
-
2018-09-20 at 3:16 AM UTC
-
2018-09-20 at 9:27 PM UTCTrump is eating his own shit
Trump is seeking to make good on a key campaign promise to build the wall, but had long pledged that Mexico – not U.S. taxpayers – would fund it, something Mexico has refused to do. He has now, instead, turned to Congress for support. Mexico told him to go fuck himself.
Now asshole Donald Trump is pressing fellow Republicans in Congress on Thursday to "get tough" and push to fund his proposed border wall in the current spending bill, raising the specter of a government shutdown when funding lapses later this month.
In a post on Twitter, Trump called the bill "ridiculous" for not including funds for a planned wall along the U.S. border with Mexico, and blamed Democrats for blocking it in the plan passed by the Republican-controlled Senate on Tuesday.
Republicans, who are seeking to keep control of both chambers in the November election, narrowly control the Senate with 51 seats against 49 for Democrats, and need Democrats' support to pass any spending legislation.
The spending legislation must pass the Republican-controlled U.S. House of Representatives before it can be signed into law by Trump.
Trump has previously threatened to let the government shut down on Oct. 1 if he does not get money for the border wall.
-
2018-09-20 at 9:42 PM UTC
-
2018-09-20 at 9:53 PM UTC
-
2018-09-20 at 9:54 PM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny looll. you illeterate fucking retard.
like infinity explained, unemployment rate is in its negative because there are more jobs available than there are people who are able to work.
raising wages WONT MAGICALLY MAKE PEOPLE APPEAR OUT OF THIN AIR TO FILL THESE VACANCIES.
i am mad, becos darwinism is taking too long to weed retards like you out.
raising wages increases the labor pool due to motivating the percentage of americans that dont want to work and are therefore not counted as 'unemployed'
same thing they did back in the 1400s then 1/3 of the labor pool dried up. *cough* -
2018-09-20 at 9:57 PM UTC
-
2018-09-20 at 9:59 PM UTC
-
2018-09-20 at 10:38 PM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny looll. you illeterate fucking retard.
like infinity explained, unemployment rate is in its negative because there are more jobs available than there are people who are able to work.
raising wages WONT MAGICALLY MAKE PEOPLE APPEAR OUT OF THIN AIR TO FILL THESE VACANCIES.
i am mad, becos darwinism is taking too long to weed retards like you out.
The point of an economy is to provide good lives to the people within a country.
It is not supposed to be an end in itself.
Like W. Bush, demanding immigrants be allowed to move to America to become Americans in order to "Do The Jobs American's Wouldn't Do" (he really said this).
What's the fucking point in that? -
2018-09-21 at 12:11 AM UTC
-
2018-09-21 at 3:05 AM UTC
-
2018-09-21 at 3:55 AM UTC
Originally posted by infinityshock increase pay
bu ... but you already said :
Originally posted by infinityshock far more jobs than there are employees
if increasing pay can make people work, then there arent really far more jobs than there are employees, it just means that there are more jobs tgan there are people who are WILLING TO WORK.
people who are not willing to work because the pay is low ARE STILL CONSIDERED UNEMPLOYED. their presence will only make unemployment rate POSITIVE.
not negative. so if your having a lot of people who dont want to work because the pay is low, you have [positive] unemployment. -
2018-09-21 at 3:57 AM UTC
Originally posted by infinityshock raising wages increases the labor pool due to motivating the percentage of americans that dont want to work and are therefore not counted as 'unemployed'
same thing they did back in the 1400s then 1/3 of the labor pool dried up. *cough*
wait, people who dont want to work are not considered as unemployed ? -
2018-09-21 at 4:02 AM UTC
Originally posted by MORALLY SUPERIOR BEING 2.0 - The GMO Reckoning The point of an economy is to provide good lives to the people within a country.
It is not supposed to be an end in itself.
Like W. Bush, demanding immigrants be allowed to move to America to become Americans in order to "Do The Jobs American's Wouldn't Do" (he really said this).
What's the fucking point in that?
it really depends who they define as 'the people'.
as of right now in america and the most of the countries other than those negrolands, it appears to be the mega corporations. -
2018-09-21 at 7:50 AM UTC