User Controls
The twin towers were destroyed by directed energy weapons
-
2018-08-30 at 7:02 PM UTCs p o o k y
-
2018-08-30 at 7:03 PM UTC
-
2018-08-30 at 8:07 PM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL It's the distance between the outermost debris and the face of the building which is suspect, and frankly unbelievable. Only explosive charges could launch debris that far.
it's not that far though, and lighter materials have to go somewhere when the roof hits the floor -
2018-08-30 at 8:16 PM UTC
Originally posted by aldra against my own better judgment I am reading this article
http://drjudywood.com/articles/DEW/StarWarsBeam1.html
well, it's 6am now and I read the whole thing.
I don't agree with the conclusions and her understanding of current explosives and energy weapons tech isn't great, but there are some very interesting points in there, specifically:
indications that there was far less rubble and more dust than there should've been
steel beams being warped and destroyed in unusual ways, and iron/steel literally dissolving on camera
cars seemingly being exposed to extreme heat in places that weren't significantly affected by fire or debris
I'll post more when I'm not on my phone -
2018-08-30 at 8:19 PM UTC
-
2018-08-30 at 8:45 PM UTC
Originally posted by Madman Why is it so hard for some people to believe that jihadis fucking hate us and will kill us if they get a chance? I honestly think that people who get wrapped up in conspiracy shit are like subconsciously horrified and just can't deal with the reality. They buy this shit because they can't get their mind around a guy shooting kinder gardeners.
You can grow kinder in a garden? How hard is that? Is it so easy a kindergartener could do it?
BTW why would anyone want to shoot someone for gardening kinder? -
2018-08-30 at 9:15 PM UTCJet fuel did ALL THAT! Molten steel six weeks after the attacks!
-
2018-08-30 at 9:57 PM UTC80 plus percent of mass was missing.. it turned to fine dust.. pyroclastic cloud.
-
2018-08-30 at 10:01 PM UTC
Originally posted by Rock_N_Rollover It's not falling.
LOOK.
It's being ejected up and outward.
Are you fuckers on here blind??
I understand the fear of people seeing something isn't all that is stated to be all of the fax.. losing their pensions.. I believe some of them know more is going on.. but they're not going to throw away all their hard work away.. and honestly I understand them for this -
2018-08-30 at 11:49 PM UTCThe BBC reported on live television that WTC7 had fallen 30 minutes BEFORE it actually did. Of all the buildings to "make a mistake" on, it ended up to be that very one. What a coincidence!! Then British intelligence services tried to get the master reel of that broadcast, but the BBC head refused to turn it over, so the intelligence services broke into the BBC vault and stole it. It vanished without a trace, BUT EVERY OTHER BBC BROADCAST MASTER TAPE FROM ITS ENTIRE HISTORY is still in the vault. What a coincidence!!
-
2018-08-30 at 11:51 PM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL The BBC reported on live television that WTC7 had fallen 30 minutes BEFORE it actually did. Of all the buildings to "make a mistake" on, it ended up to be that very one. What a coincidence!! Then British intelligence services tried to get the master reel of that broadcast, but the BBC head refused to turn it over, so the intelligence services broke into the BBC vault and stole it. It vanished without a trace, BUT EVERY OTHER BBC BROADCAST MASTER TAPE FROM ITS ENTIRE HISTORY is still in the vault. What a coincidence!!
Its not that I dont believe you, cause I do,
But do you have a source for this info? -
2018-08-30 at 11:55 PM UTC
Originally posted by CoosCoosOnTheLoose Its not that I dont believe you, cause I do,
But do you have a source for this info?
"We no longer have the original tapes of our 9/11 coverage (for reasons of cock-up, not conspiracy). So if someone has got a recording of our output, I'd love to get hold of it. We do have the tapes for our sister channel News 24, but they don't help clear up the issue one way or another." ~ Richard Porter, head of news at BBC World
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2007/02/part_of_the_conspiracy.html -
2018-08-31 at 12:04 AM UTCAnother tidbit they don't want you to know is that the entire WTC7 structure was heavily reinforced in the 1980's, but NIST went out of its way to completely ignore those reinforcements in their calculations and deliberately used much older data on purpose. What a coincidence!!
-
2018-08-31 at 12:09 AM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL The BBC reported on live television that WTC7 had fallen 30 minutes BEFORE it actually did. Of all the buildings to "make a mistake" on, it ended up to be that very one. What a coincidence!! Then British intelligence services tried to get the master reel of that broadcast, but the BBC head refused to turn it over, so the intelligence services broke into the BBC vault and stole it. It vanished without a trace, BUT EVERY OTHER BBC BROADCAST MASTER TAPE FROM ITS ENTIRE HISTORY is still in the vault. What a coincidence!!
This sounds suspiciously similar to another piece of fake news you've been pushing on here recently. -
2018-08-31 at 12:11 AM UTC
-
2018-08-31 at 12:42 AM UTC
-
2018-08-31 at 12:46 AM UTCHey Spectral. I got a hold of Micheal Liedke re doing followup on totse. His response was I work for Rueters now n only interested in sports news. Or some B's reason.. sellout? Or pension??
-
2018-08-31 at 1:44 AM UTC
-
2018-08-31 at 4:28 AM UTCIt's all a smoke screen. The Indonesians did it so they could take our lucky charms
-
2018-08-31 at 4:48 AM UTC
