User Controls
Democrats or Republicans?
-
2018-08-19 at 4:07 PM UTC
Originally posted by HTS I'm not saying they'd actually say "fuck you" to Israel, but if anyone is more likely it's the democrats. On account of a couple things.
1) Democrats are generally more secular. They are less willing to accept religious justifications for Zionism. Whereas a comparitively large portion of the Republican base are evangelical Christians who believe the jedis are God's chosen people and can more easily be convinced that Israel is theirs by divine right.
2) Oppressed brown people are kind of the modern democratic party's raison d'être. There is motivation there for stepping on Israel's toes in solidarity with the poor oppressed Palestinians. Democrats actually care about Palestinians. Republicans not so much. BDS isn't a exactly right wing movement, y'know?
3) While both parties are totally okay with imperialism and waging wars in poor brown countries across the globe, the Republicans are more the "party of the military". Y'know? Israel is a valuable military ally in the region.
Y'know? Y'know?
- democrats and republicans are one in the same with the design intention being to provide the illusion of choice in elections
- there are no oppressed handsome and well tanned individuals. that is yet another myth perpetuated by the kike-controlled MINITRU to propagate strife
- israel is not an ally. israel is a parasite to the taxpayers of the US with any claim to the contrary being originated by the kike MINITRU propaganda -
2018-08-19 at 4:12 PM UTC
-
2018-08-19 at 4:14 PM UTC
-
2018-08-19 at 4:57 PM UTCIt's true that the jedis do seem to have lost control of the Democratic party to a huge extent.
jedis regard themselves as the eternal victims, and totally not white, but to normal brown people jedis are just another group of rich, privileged white people trying to control them.
I think more and more people are waking up - it's kind of shocking and pathetic to find people who don't acknowledge the enormous soft power jedis exert. -
2018-08-19 at 5:02 PM UTC
-
2018-08-19 at 5:30 PM UTCThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2018-08-19 at 5:32 PM UTC
-
2018-08-19 at 5:34 PM UTC
-
2018-08-20 at 12:38 AM UTC
Originally posted by HTS I'm not saying they'd actually say "fuck you" to Israel, but if anyone is more likely it's the democrats. On account of a couple things.
1) Democrats are generally more secular. They are less willing to accept religious justifications for Zionism. Whereas a comparitively large portion of the Republican base are evangelical Christians who believe the jedis are God's chosen people and can more easily be convinced that Israel is theirs by divine right.
2) Oppressed brown people are kind of the modern democratic party's raison d'être. There is motivation there for stepping on Israel's toes in solidarity with the poor oppressed Palestinians. Democrats actually care about Palestinians. Republicans not so much. BDS isn't a exactly right wing movement, y'know?
3) While both parties are totally okay with imperialism and waging wars in poor brown countries across the globe, the Republicans are more the "party of the military". Y'know? Israel is a valuable military ally in the region.
Y'know? Y'know?
Jesus was not a jedi and the jedis are no one's chosen people. -
2018-08-20 at 12:39 AM UTC
-
2018-08-20 at 12:50 AM UTC
-
2018-08-20 at 5:05 AM UTC
Originally posted by HTS I'm not saying they'd actually say "fuck you" to Israel, but if anyone is more likely it's the democrats. On account of a couple things.
1) Democrats are generally more secular. They are less willing to accept religious justifications for Zionism. Whereas a comparitively large portion of the Republican base are evangelical Christians who believe the jedis are God's chosen people and can more easily be convinced that Israel is theirs by divine right.
2) Oppressed brown people are kind of the modern democratic party's raison d'être. There is motivation there for stepping on Israel's toes in solidarity with the poor oppressed Palestinians. Democrats actually care about Palestinians. Republicans not so much. BDS isn't a exactly right wing movement, y'know?
3) While both parties are totally okay with imperialism and waging wars in poor brown countries across the globe, the Republicans are more the "party of the military". Y'know? Israel is a valuable military ally in the region.
Y'know? Y'know?
last one's more of a meme than anything else considering how many wars have been initiated by/under democrat governments, but these could be applied more accurately to democrat voters than the actual party. I've never seen ANY BDS support in the political establishment - the democratic party doesn't care about 'oppressed brown people' so much as it cares about their votes, and works to tether them to democrat policies.
Originally posted by stl1 Not true lately.
Just look at all of our allies Trump has pissed off as well as his cozying up to Russia and N. Korea.
The US doesn't have allies, only vassals and they've historically been treated poorly any time they either haven't obeyed or been 'economically viable'. Trump's essentially a salesman - the 'company' allows him to be loud and aggressive as long as he gets money out of client states, while also being able to claim that his behaviour doesn't represent them.
North Korea is the same story - regardless of the rhetoric, there is no military solution to the situation. The 'powers that be' have known this all along, hoping that threats alone would change their behaviour - believing that diplomacy was 'showing weakness' they just kept doubling down on threats until it became obvious that they wouldn't work, at which point it became 'Trump's policy'.
Russia is different - most of the US political establishment is bent on a new cold (at least) war, and Trump seems to be the only one who understands how dangerous the situation is. Even during the cold war diplomatic ties were kept open as it was understood what little misunderstandings might lead to a nuclear exchange, but today the entire political and media establishment are arrayed against him the moment he decides to organise an informal meeting with the Russian head of state. Even though he chooses to try to repair US-Russian relations he's stopped by his own government.
