2018-08-16 at 6:13 PM UTC
I wonder how they'd delegate the police force if say, 200 rapey kidnappers all stole a kid each from different parts of town and held them hostage for ransoms. Would the police just have to go down the list like first come first served or would they try to send people to all of the hostages at the same time, like what if it was a small town and they didn't have the means to but the kidnappers were getting impatient and tensions were really HEATING UP what do they do how do they prioritize?????
Thanks.
2018-08-16 at 6:16 PM UTC
itybit
African Astronaut
[daze my amino pe-tsai]
They call in the FBI for rapey kidnapping lol
2018-08-16 at 6:18 PM UTC
There's no TIME. all the kidnappers gave an hour time limit or they'll rape and kill their respective little kid.
2018-08-16 at 6:24 PM UTC
They would deputize the entire town and give the order to, and this is verbatim, "Go fuck shit up, family".
2018-08-16 at 6:26 PM UTC
It's a town of 250 people. 100 kidnappers. 100 kids. 50 single moms who are also the police force.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2018-08-16 at 6:27 PM UTC
Sudo
Black Hole
[my hereto riemannian peach]
Nah all they need is one barb or midge or whatever the girlhowdy cop from fargos name was. She could dump them all and rescue the chillins right after her 1pm lunch of a hot turkey sandwich
2018-08-16 at 7:42 PM UTC
They'd call in help from nearby cities.
2018-08-16 at 8:04 PM UTC
they would appoint a hostage negotiator for all suspects and go from there.
but of course, the rich, wealthy white kid stolen would most likely get saved first.
2018-08-16 at 9:49 PM UTC
Op your thread highlights an important overarching Premise... the only effective way to combat the authorities is through synchronized resistance.
2018-08-17 at 12:59 AM UTC
Ajax
African Astronaut
[rumor the placative aphakia]
Setting the entire town on fire is the only logical solution.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2018-08-17 at 1:21 AM UTC
Grimace
motherfucker
[my enumerable hindi guideword]
I agree with Ajax. Clearly, there is no good outcome in this situation you've created.
The only thing police would have going for them is to deputize the 50 single mothers and arm them, then fire/carpet bomb the whole town at once and amongst the confusion of the roaring flames and shellshock from exploding bombs, they could kick in each door of all surviving buildings in a synchronized door stomp kick and ATTEMPT to each rescue ONE hostage each.
I figure if they came back with 10 kids out of 100, they'd be doing pretty good. Spare 90 of them from a punishing rape and murder by blasting their bodies apart from raining bombs.
2018-08-17 at 1:25 AM UTC
that photo is fake and G cause it's tipping over. buildings would never just tip over. unless they're the MOON PERSON Building in San Francisco.
