2018-08-07 at 4:03 PM UTC
-SpectraL
coward
[the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
Once the Amigas and Commodore64s and 300 baud modems came in, word of the incoming fascist state began to spread more rapidly.
2018-08-08 at 12:55 AM UTC
-SpectraL
coward
[the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
Originally posted by S6x
Why do you keep saying silly shit like this.
what bothers you about me getting copies of the original Manifesto posted in 2001 regarding what was seriously about to take place several months from it's first creation time early in the year?
post it for posterity.
The original Manifesto and all copies were destroyed forever, so that no one can get their hands on that information.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2018-08-08 at 4:19 PM UTC
The group’s message was echoed by top attorney David A. French, who wrote a piece for the New York Times in which he argued that Big Tech colluding to ban Infowars should leave people “deeply concerned” because it was a likely abuse of power.
Dr. Robert Epstein also defended Infowars during a Breitbart News town hall on Internet freedom last night.
“Who on Earth gave these private companies the power to make decisions about what everyone in the world is going to see or not see?” asked Epstein, adding that Big Tech had become too powerful and now has the influence to shift millions of votes in national elections through censorship and algoirthm manipulation.
“Nobody has thought this through. There are no relevant laws or regulations in place, at least in the United States. If people really started thinking about this, they would realize – again, no matter what their feelings are about Donald Trump, or Alex Jones, or anyone else – wait a minute, these companies shouldn’t have that power, period ,” said Epstein.
2018-08-08 at 4:24 PM UTC
"“Who on Earth gave these private companies the power to make decisions about what everyone in the world is going to see or not see?” "
Um themselves, it's THEIR platform..what an idiot. If you want the world to see your crap...create your own platform rather than expect others who may or may not agree with your opinion to host it.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2018-08-08 at 4:29 PM UTC
There you go folks.
I don't call him Uncle Idiot for nothing.
Look at the logic of this fucking fool. Lololol.
2018-08-08 at 4:32 PM UTC
Um it's perfectly logical...a private company can choose what they host and what they don't...you have to be pretty moronic not to understand that simple fact.
Just as you can choose who you let in your home or not...
Just because an idiot like YOU doesn't like it doesn't mean they can't and don't have the right to do it.
...again go start your own platform...maroon.
2018-08-08 at 4:36 PM UTC
"Who are these PRIVATE Companies..." fucking clue is right there moron...lololol..no democracy in the private sector...get a clue.
2018-08-08 at 4:37 PM UTC
You know ,I assume, Google,YouTube, Facebook have what you would call a monopoly.
They chose what they want you to be able to see.
At least Twitter didn't cave in. Yet.
2018-08-08 at 5:36 PM UTC
Originally posted by Rock_N_Rollover
“Who on Earth gave these private companies the power to make decisions about what everyone in the world is going to see or not see?” asked Epstein, adding that Big Tech had become too powerful and now has the influence to shift millions of votes in national elections through censorship and algoirthm manipulation.
welcome to the era of feudal-capitalism.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
French went on to assert that what constitutes hate speech is “extraordinarily vague” and that, “We live in times when the slightest deviation from the latest and ever-changing social justice style guide is deemed bigoted and, yes, “dehumanizing.”
The attorney cited the example of the Southern Poverty Law Center, a far-left group which works with Big Tech to define “hate speech”. The SPLC recently had to pay Maajid Nawaz, a Muslim reformist, $3.375 million for labeling him an “anti-Muslim extremist.”
French concluded that “libel” or “slander” should be the bar for content being banned, not “hate speech,” given the fact that it is wide open to interpretation.
He'll I'm a anti-Muslim extremist. Where's my fucking money? ;-)
2018-08-09 at 7:12 PM UTC
kroz
weak whyte, frothy cuck, and former twink
its just silly to think a 90lbs kid with full metal jacket and rounds and rounds of ammo went and killed an entire school. so fake
