User Controls
Which type of child abuse do you consider to be the worst?
-
2018-07-31 at 6:21 PM UTC
-
2018-07-31 at 6:26 PM UTC
Originally posted by joerell Don't say anything negative about pedophiles…they'll claim you were diddled as a kid or worse. No I'm not on a mission to protect innocent children and yet everyone should be. To protect them from sick parents, relatives, priests, teachers, drunks, addicts, predators and even serial criminals. There are only different levels and all forms of sexual and physical abuse should be prevented as they all cause damage and an unhealthy life style. No mercy to parasites…throw them in jail and remove their right to live in society.
the best way to raise child sex abuse awareness is to abuse them yourself.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2018-07-31 at 6:29 PM UTC
-
2018-07-31 at 7:49 PM UTC
Originally posted by Lanny Hmmm, tough call, lots and lots of ways to abuse children but for me I'd say it's a tie between being raised in a capitalist society and American primary/secondary education.
Forcing kids to memorize timestables is particularly heinous.
kek
for sheer volume of children affected, that's hard to beat
the catholic church is going to need to up its gameThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2018-07-31 at 7:53 PM UTC
Originally posted by Sophie My user title is 100% factual. Why would i be afraid of the truth? More importantly why are you representing a gender confused beta faggot that shot up a mall?
Surely if you wanna be edgy, or rep a mass shooter there are more interesting ones out there. Unless you're literally 12. In which case; 12/f/l?
Can you elaborate -
2018-07-31 at 7:56 PM UTC
Originally posted by aldra kek
for sheer volume of children affected, that's hard to beat
the catholic church is going to need to up its game
"Your holiness, there just aren't enough Catholic children to molest. We'll never catch up with the americans!"
"It's OK, I have a plan. Open more orphanages and double down on the no-birth-control thing. Soon we'll be rolling in the children"The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2018-07-31 at 8:28 PM UTC
-
2018-07-31 at 8:30 PM UTC
Originally posted by Lanny "Your holiness, there just aren't enough Catholic children to molest. We'll never catch up with the americans!"
"It's OK, I have a plan. Open more orphanages and double down on the no-birth-control thing. Soon we'll be rolling in the children"
"we need to expand our operations. get me the ayatollah on the phone" -
2018-07-31 at 9:16 PM UTC
Originally posted by joerell Don't say anything negative about pedophiles…they'll claim you were diddled as a kid or worse. No I'm not on a mission to protect innocent children and yet everyone should be. To protect them from sick parents, relatives, priests, teachers, drunks, addicts, predators and even serial criminals. There are only different levels and all forms of sexual and physical abuse should be prevented as they all cause damage and an unhealthy life style. No mercy to parasites…throw them in jail and remove their right to live in society.
why do you consider sophie as a child abuser? i've spoken to him about what he does many times and i'm confident that he is being honest when he says he's never actually touched any children. the pictures he looks at are not taken by him they are just pics that are already out on the internet. he isn't responsible for making them or putting them out there, he just faps over them is all.
. -
2018-07-31 at 9:22 PM UTC
Originally posted by NARCassist why do you consider sophie as a child abuser? i've spoken to him about what he does many times and i'm confident that he is being honest when he says he's never actually touched any children. the pictures he looks at are not taken by him they are just pics that are already out on the internet. he isn't responsible for making them or putting them out there, he just faps over them is all.
im now jealous of the homoerotic thing youve got going with sophie.
. -
2018-08-01 at 12:14 AM UTCAny, and all.
-
2018-08-01 at 12:31 AM UTC
Originally posted by NARCassist why do you consider sophie as a child abuser? i've spoken to him about what he does many times and i'm confident that he is being honest when he says he's never actually touched any children. the pictures he looks at are not taken by him they are just pics that are already out on the internet. he isn't responsible for making them or putting them out there, he just faps over them is all.
.
When you start showing interest in 4 year olds the chances of you being a confirmed pedo is high...once you start jerking off to them you are and the next phase is abuse. Pedos can't be cured...his desires will grow. -
2018-08-01 at 4:07 AM UTC
-
2018-08-01 at 5:02 AM UTCJake (Jorelle) is the biggest troll on here, as he was on DH.
-
2018-08-01 at 8:45 AM UTC
Originally posted by joerell When you start showing interest in 4 year olds the chances of you being a confirmed pedo is high…once you start jerking off to them you are and the next phase is abuse. Pedos can't be cured…his desires will grow.
fuck me, you can't even answer that one correctly, you're debating skills are next to useless. the answer you were supposed to give was that as a consumer of the child pornography sophie is creating a demand for it. as children are abused in order to produce the child porn that he consumes, he is indirectly responsible for the abuse inflicted on those poor children.
its the same with sweat shops and child slave labor. children are horribly abused physically in these sweat shops. they make for very cheap labor which in turn enables the companies to offer their goods even cheaper, in turn satisfying the demand for cheaper goods by the consumer. not only are these children forced to work long hours for little pay, they are made to work in terrible conditions where health and safety are unheard of. accidents are commonplace with the children who will be given little in the way of safety training and no chance of even being compensated for their injuries which can and often do result in death or horrifying injuries including burns(heat and chemical), loss of limbs, eye sight, hearing etc, poisoning, asbestos poisoning and much more. the children will often be beaten as a punishment for not meeting deadlines or if they refuse to work or are seen to be lacking behind.
this is in no doubt physical child abuse and as most people have agreed physical abuse is just as bad as sexual abuse when it concerns a child. so that means anybody who consumes the goods produced in these foreign sweat shops, just like sophie when he consumes his child porn, is indirectly responsible for the abuse inflicted on those children. the consumers quite simply are child abusers.
i take it you are viewing this post on some kind of device jokerell, like a laptop, smart phone or similar? it will be absolutely certain that at least some of the parts contained in the device will have been produced in sweat shops like the ones i've just mentioned. and many other items you buy jokerell will undoubtedly have been produced in them. clothes, vehicle parts, foods, packaging, circuit boards, wire and cable and many other items are still being produced in this way.
so you are one of the horrible child abusers that you are so valiantly crusading against here.
maybe you should think twice before posting stuff like this considering you are one of the evil child abusers you speak of.
Originally posted by joerell Like patients in a nut house on the day they get real ice cream…go for it. Lol. Amazing how the truth can startle so many losers and irritate them. You have to admit…it is hilarious.
Originally posted by joerell Pretty funny theory. You want to protect innocent kids and it translates into you being diddled as kid. Meanwhile the real sociopaths are out there committing crimes and corrupt socialists want us to believe pedophilia is normal…fucked up or what. LMAO.
Originally posted by joerell I didn't overact to anything…it's a normal reaction against anyone who is a sick pedophile who promotes or supports it. Someone who is disturbed may not agree and yet I'm sure the majority of sane individuals do want to protect kids. Not the elite who want to abuse them or use them in porn or for their own evil pleasure.
Originally posted by joerell I didn't over react or continuously post 40 pages describing how evil pedophiles are…they are evil and I along with the majority who are sane know they are. I was responding to posters who falsely believe they're normal supporting mentally ill individuals or claiming kids are not harmed by them. You're diddling hyopthesis is a joke…more proof that pedophiles who promote, fantasize and support this crime are insane and why your assumption is hilarious.
Originally posted by joerell Posting to protect innocent kids is not a hobby you creep…pedophiles are a cancer of society and your sanity should be questioned if you support them.
. -
2018-08-01 at 3:35 PM UTCExcellent point Narc.
-
2018-08-01 at 4:03 PM UTCEdgy.....
-
2018-08-01 at 4:17 PM UTCYou can't honestly be comparing sweatshops to being put in child porn. Like sure, sweat shops can be awful, but clothing and tech sweatshops are pretty safe.
Better examples would be mines, oil refineries, cocoa farms, etc. If you're a kid working in a factory nowadays, your 3rd world life isn't bad. You get paid garbage but those kids in mines lose lives.
Most clothes/tech isn't produced by kids anyway. Biggest issue is with young teenagers who chose to work. Like remember that cave in thailand? Youngest was 11.
Fucking a child on camera is significantly worse. Watching that, and getting off to the trauma? Yes it's less damage done to the kid, but its pretty fucked up morally and should be persecuted against so that no market is left to thrive topside.
At least for the kid, that iphone job presents opportunity. Shitty opportunities by our standards, but there's a reason young people the world over choose to take on these jobs. -
2018-08-01 at 4:40 PM UTC
Originally posted by Ensign §m£ÂgØL You can't honestly be comparing sweatshops to being put in child porn. Like sure, sweat shops can be awful, but clothing and tech sweatshops are pretty safe.
Better examples would be mines, oil refineries, cocoa farms, etc. If you're a kid working in a factory nowadays, your 3rd world life isn't bad. You get paid garbage but those kids in mines lose lives.
Most clothes/tech isn't produced by kids anyway. Biggest issue is with young teenagers who chose to work. Like remember that cave in thailand? Youngest was 11.
Fucking a child on camera is significantly worse. Watching that, and getting off to the trauma? Yes it's less damage done to the kid, but its pretty fucked up morally and should be persecuted against so that no market is left to thrive topside.
At least for the kid, that iphone job presents opportunity. Shitty opportunities by our standards, but there's a reason young people the world over choose to take on these jobs.
wow, you really know how to miss the point don't you?
. -
2018-08-01 at 4:46 PM UTC
Originally posted by Ensign §m£ÂgØL Most clothes/tech isn't produced by kids anyway. Biggest issue is with young teenagers who chose to work. Like remember that cave in thailand? Youngest was 11.
do you really think most is good enough when it comes to child abuse?
'meh like, most kids aren't being horribly abused in sweat shops, so that's ok then, no problem at all.'
.
