User Controls

Miss Sophie finds dhers to be quite dopey...

  1. POLECAT POLECAT is a motherfucking ferret [my presentably immunised ammonification]
    between you n me yes I hear ya but to nutters its the same thing
  2. joerell African Astronaut [twine our circinate supersymmetry]
    Originally posted by POLECAT total lak of factual reality on ur part tho,, nothing you say has any value dew to ur disregard for facts and truths

    I have facts...you've proven to be a moron.
  3. POLECAT POLECAT is a motherfucking ferret [my presentably immunised ammonification]
    I have proven to be more smarter than you on any given day
  4. EllariaSand African Astronaut
    Originally posted by POLECAT I have proven to be more smarter than you on any given day

    Sorry moron

    You lose again šŸ˜‚šŸ¤£šŸ˜‚
  5. joerell African Astronaut [twine our circinate supersymmetry]
    Originally posted by EllariaSand Perhaps this will help you understand why he probably refrains from actually downloading and saving his child porn…..unless of course heā€™s as much of a moron as youā€™ve proven yourself to be…

    Child pornography investigations often involve a combination of federal, state, and local law enforcement. The involvement of the federal authorities occurs because of the seriousness of the alleged offense, and because child pornography rings have grown across state lines and even international borders. For instance, a 2013 international child pornography investigation known as Project Spade resulted in the arrest of over 350 people in 50 countries. Law enforcement agencies are relying more and more on technologically advanced methods to aid these investigations ā€“ particularly the infiltration of file-sharing networks.

    Child pornography networks have been forced to adapt, and they now use encryption techniques and anonymous networks on the ā€œdark webā€ so that they can share their files. Inaccessible with a normal web browser, the dark web is the portion of the internet used by governments, corporations, and also criminals. Federal law enforcement has vastly increased its capacity to break into secure networks operating within the dark web.

    https://www.nedbarnett.com/police-catch-people-child-pornography/


    Iā€™d say his posts are a pretty clear admission that he has easy access to material that only a demented creep would even begin to want or know how to find….

    Sophie already admitted to wanting to commit a crime...intent to transfer child porn to another computer to implicate anyone who sees him as being demented. His anger implies exactly what you posted...very clearly.
  6. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    This thread is now about people who don't exactly hate pedophiles and would snuggle one if pressed to do so.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  7. joerell African Astronaut [twine our circinate supersymmetry]
    Originally posted by EllariaSand Right

    He ignored that question

    Perhaps because posting an admission to acting on his ā€œdesiresā€ could open him to criminal investigation


    Discuss pedophelia in a rational manner…….WTF kind of rational is that??
    Victimizing innocent children should be discussed in a ā€œrational mannerā€………..


    Itā€™s depraved
    Period
    The end

    In reality he did admit to having some by claiming that he would infect someone's computer with child porn...again his anger alone proves there's more to this story and like Legend posted where's the humor. Fantasizing about 4 year olds definitely equates to mental illness and why kids should be protected. Parents should be aware also...these creeps do exist and are a great threat.
  8. I touched a 7yr olds Vejay when I was 6.
  9. POLECAT POLECAT is a motherfucking ferret [my presentably immunised ammonification]
    Sophie already admitted to wanting to commit a crime,,,

    that in itself is not a crime,, I hve several crimes I would like to be involved in but I know not to do it unless the time is worth the crime
  10. joerell African Astronaut [twine our circinate supersymmetry]
    Originally posted by POLECAT OR he didnt answer because he knew it would drive you fucking nutters bat shit crazy,,lol

    The only ones who are bat shit crazy are morons like yourself defending sick pedos who fantasize about 4 year olds...what logical rational reason do you have for supporting a creep like this or do you share his interest.
  11. POLECAT POLECAT is a motherfucking ferret [my presentably immunised ammonification]
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson I touched a 7yr olds Vejay when I was 6.

    I got a bj from a 4 year old,, I was 6 and she knew what she was doing,, I didnt even know about bj's then
  12. joerell African Astronaut [twine our circinate supersymmetry]
    Originally posted by POLECAT I have proven to be more smarter than you on any given day

    In your opinion I'm sure you think you're smarter. Like late at night sitting on your old broken down front porch as the sun goes down smoking a bowl blowing a kiss to Rick your man servant and viewing your mushroom plantation with pride. With a truck that doesn't run and not even $40 extra to your name to buy solder to build a steamer made of scrap medal. You definitely created a GENUS industry and should be admired. I mean you're so smart you removed all your teeth never having worked 30 years and even ate your own product thinking it was poisonous needing expert help online. Fuck you definitely proved it to me. LMAO.
  13. POLECAT POLECAT is a motherfucking ferret [my presentably immunised ammonification]
    has to really suck to be so negative ,, the fucking world can crumble around me and I still have a smile on my face
  14. Red_Woman African Astronaut
    Originally posted by aldra that's the same as the 'all men are rapists' argument

    I don't think he meant that. If I got his comment right, he's comparing it with an heterosexual or gay adults, who are attracted to who they are and will pursue that person. As you normally do, no violance or abuse. The difference is the consent between two adults.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  15. aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    Originally posted by Red_Woman I don't think he meant that. If I got his comment right, he's comparing it with an heterosexual or gay adults, who are attracted to who they are and will pursue that person. As you normally do, no violance or abuse. The difference is the consent between two adults.

    he specifically said 'even without acting on it'. everyone has all sorts of unwholesome thoughts; they only become crimes when they're acted upon. child enthusiasts should not be the exception to the rule just because the topic is emotionally charged.

    on topic, I dislike that aspect of soph's personality but I don't see the point in trying to moralize over the internet, especially considering it's extremely unlikely we'd ever meet in person, intentionally or not.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  16. Red_Woman African Astronaut
    Originally posted by aldra he specifically said 'even without acting on it'. everyone has all sorts of unwholesome thoughts; they only become crimes when they're acted upon. child enthusiasts should not be the exception to the rule just because the topic is emotionally charged.

    Because sooner or latter you are going to act on it. Not with violence but because you will find smb you do like, and you will pursue that person. Maybe that's what he meant. Idk, it's what I understood though but I might be wrong.

    I am not an expert on the issue tbh. Not only professionally, but I haven't read a lot on the argument either. Like say, I've read about serial killers etc. Is it a illnes? It is treated as such, therefore ready to explode anytime even if you never acted on it so far? I honestly don't know the answer to that.

    on topic, I dislike that aspect of soph's personality but I don't see the point in trying to moralize over the internet, especially considering it's extremely unlikely we'd ever meet in person, intentionally or not.

    I fully agree with this.
    I don't know Sophie at all. For all I know heƬs trolling big time. No offence but I take 99% of statements here with a pinch of salt.
    I don't find the subject ammusing in anycase. But as you said, I don't see the point of fighting on internet and going on and on against a "ghost" basically.
  17. POLECAT POLECAT is a motherfucking ferret [my presentably immunised ammonification]
    I am not an expert on the issue tbh. Not only professionally, but I haven't read a lot on the argument either. Like say, I've read about serial killers etc. Is it a illnes? It is treated as such, therefore ready to explode anytime even if you never acted on it so far? I honestly don't know the answer to that.

    its only an illness if homosexuality is a sickness
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  18. Red_Woman African Astronaut
    Originally posted by POLECAT its only an illness if homosexuality is a sickness

    What homosexuality got to do with this though? This is about children, regardless of sex.
    Sophie is a man, for example, and he said is attracted to young female children. Or did I get that wrong?
  19. cupocheer Space Nigga [unwillingly condescend the dp]
    I'm, honestly, a female. My electronic friends don't take any schit from me, however. LMRAO
  20. aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    Originally posted by Red_Woman Because sooner or latter you are going to act on it. Not with violence but because you will find smb you do like, and you will pursue that person. Maybe that's what he meant. Idk, it's what I understood though but I might be wrong.

    that's not necessarily true though. some people are celibate or ascetic; I'd suspect rates are higher among those people because on top of the normal motivations, most understand on some level that acting out their desires is harmful.

    there's some debate as to whether paedophilia is a mental illness, but I'd doubt there will ever be a consensus because 1. that creates even more questions of accountability and 2. the same principles will have to be applied to other sexual deviances such as homosexuality, transsexuality etc.

    in my opinion I wouldn't call any of them mental illnesses, perhaps genetic defects, and that actually acting on them is the point where they can be defined. Of course a person with feelings that they recognise as socially or personally destructive can and should seek help in resolving them, but until that point their problems are their own.

    Originally posted by Red_Woman What homosexuality got to do with this though? This is about children, regardless of sex.
    Sophie is a man, for example, and he said is attracted to young female children. Or did I get that wrong?

    he means that if you define paedophilia as a mental illness, any other deviant sexual behaviour must also be categorised the same way
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
Jump to Top