User Controls
Eurasian race, the one true master race.
-
2018-07-23 at 12:16 PM UTC
-
2018-07-23 at 12:25 PM UTC
Originally posted by PrettyHateMachine All of eartly history up to this point has played out for one final outcome, the birth of the Universal Eurasian Nationalist movement headed by yours truly.
White nationalism is nothing more than a slave revolt.
You need to understand this. Whites are tax slaves. The jedis leach from us. We are their slaves.
White pride is verboten, and regarded as hatred, a capital offense, the same way underclass revolts in all jedi run empires are.
The jedis were the tax collectors and the middle men in the Achemenid Empire, the Egyptian Empire (Moses was the Pharohs Finance Minister), the Ottoman Empire (the multazim, or tax farmers, were really jediey). They were 90%+ of the Commissars in the early Soviet Union.
Same thing in the American Empire.
Until you realise that white pride is a proletarian revolt as opposed to a racial thing, you will get no where.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2018-07-23 at 12:34 PM UTCWhites and the Han Chinese are in somewhat similar situations, as both are needed as the core demographic bedrock of their respective countries/empires, and thus denied an independent voice or independent identity. Empire is nothing more than bleeding the centre to expand the periphery.
-
2018-07-23 at 12:36 PM UTC
Originally posted by Cootehill Are you sexually attracted to Chinese men? Women?
Depends on the Chinese man or woman in question.
But even if I absolutely wasn't attracted to Chinese people, what would that prove? It could just mean I share a racial preference for people who look like me. You place an undue amount of power in the individual assessment of aesthetic. It is the height of subjectivity and utterly meaningless.
"I'm not personally attracted to Chinese people or city dwellers" != "Chinese people and city dwellers are inferior" -
2018-07-23 at 12:37 PM UTCGlad you cuckbois finally accept I am master race. Your women want the kebab.
-
2018-07-23 at 12:37 PM UTC
-
2018-07-23 at 12:39 PM UTC
-
2018-07-23 at 12:41 PM UTCOf course the Euros are the lower tier of the Eurasian master race, as they endorse such things as cutting your own cock off and becoming a woman. The brown thick kebabed masters of history and civilization only tolerate such things on the principle that they are a cure for faggotry.
-
2018-07-23 at 12:50 PM UTC
Originally posted by Captain Of course the Euros are the lower tier of the Eurasian master race, as they endorse such things as cutting your own cock off and becoming a woman. The brown thick kebabed masters of history and civilization only tolerate such things on the principle that they are a cure for faggotry.
So the thick kababed masters endorse it too. -
2018-07-23 at 1 PM UTC
Originally posted by HTS Depends on the Chinese man or woman in question.
Cop out. You're claiming it's impossible to generalise. You said you were attracted to negro men, so it is possible to generalise.
Anyway, let's compare a Chinese and a nigger. The nigger is taller, more muscly, bigger dick, more brutish, more individualistic, more assertive, more violent, etc.
Urbanisation clearly tends to select away from these traits.
There are exceptions of course. In the interview I mentioned Doolittle mentioned the Dutch, who are pretty much the smartest, tallest and best looking people in Europe, despite being more or less urbanised. It'd be interesting to find out what eugenics he refers to that caused that. -
2018-07-23 at 1 PM UTC
Originally posted by Captain Of course the Euros are the lower tier of the Eurasian master race, as they endorse such things as cutting your own cock off and becoming a woman. The brown thick kebabed masters of history and civilization only tolerate such things on the principle that they are a cure for faggotry.
Shouldn't you be off raping and murdering 6 year old Scottish girls or throwing acid on 3 year olds? -
2018-07-23 at 1:08 PM UTC
Originally posted by Cootehill Cop out. You're claiming it's impossible to generalise. You said you were attracted to negro men, so it is possible to generalise.
I say that for the memes. Depends on the black dude too. I just play the "BBC loving size queen tranny" part for the lulz.
Originally posted by Cootehill Anyway, let's compare a Chinese and a nigger. The nigger is taller, more muscly, bigger dick, more brutish, more individualistic, more assertive, more violent, etc.
And he's also a nigger. It sounds like you're making a case that white men are not so far removed from niggers, like that makes white people racially superior. That is a hot fucking take, even for a regressive ass such as yourself.
Originally posted by Cootehill Urbanisation clearly tends to select away from these traits.
Which is good, considering violent, brutish, and muscly are only good for two things - laying mean pipe and laying people out. Neither of which are traits of any particular value to modern civilization, rural or urban. Having some violent people under your thumb is valuable. Beyond that, these are traits that needn't exist. The size of the niche which calls for them has shrunk drastically.
Originally posted by Cootehill There are exceptions of course. In the interview I mentioned Doolittle mentioned the Dutch, who are pretty much the smartest, tallest and best looking people in Europe, despite being more or less urbanised. It'd be interesting to find out what eugenics he refers to that caused that.
At least you're willing to acknowledge exceptions to your made up rule. -
2018-07-23 at 1:20 PM UTC
Originally posted by HTS I say that for the memes. Depends on the black dude too. I just play the "BBC loving size queen tranny" part for the lulz.
Meh.And he's also a nigger. It sounds like you're making a case that white men are not so far removed from niggers, like that makes white people racially superior. That is a hot fucking take, even for a regressive ass such as yourself.
So the ultimate form of life is a Foxconn worker, placidly assembling iPhones?
TBH I have more respect for a nigger sitting under a tree.Which is good, considering violent, brutish, and muscly are only good for two things - laying mean pipe and laying people out. Neither of which are traits of any particular value to modern civilization, rural or urban. Having some violent people under your thumb is valuable. Beyond that, these are traits that needn't exist. The size of the niche which calls for them has shrunk drastically.
Struggle is eternal. Muscles are good. When man is not striving he is declining.
Beauty is not just subjective. Aesthetics are a meaning of life.
Humans should be assertive and well muscled. I don't see any downside, apart from to those who would try to rule us.
White people aren't violent enough. It is their biggest weakness.At least you're willing to acknowledge exceptions to your made up rule.
Exception proves the rule. -
2018-07-23 at 1:23 PM UTC
-
2018-07-23 at 1:49 PM UTC
-
2018-07-23 at 1:52 PM UTC
-
2018-07-23 at 1:53 PM UTC
-
2018-07-23 at 1:54 PM UTC
-
2018-07-23 at 5:15 PM UTC
Originally posted by Lanny Yes, these terms are synonyms in this case unless there's some distinction between the two I'm not away of?
well a muslim can be unislamic while things islamic cant be un-muslim.So what's your point here? That some historians pick different terms to describe an era than others? If you want to claim the era was not actually a golden age then fine, present evidence to that effect.
like i said, there never was an islamic golden age. the proof of this was already in the wiki you posted, that the term itself can not be unambiguously defined.
just like your sexuality.
some say it was just a few hundred years. some goatsed it to 600+ years.
saying that there was actually a ''golden age'' in those times will be like saying the period of american golden age spans from the day the declaration of independence was signed until today in trump regnum based on all the achievement of corporate america for the past 30 years.
and american republic is less than 300 years.
it was back in the 90s when bleeding heart liberals and academics began romanticizing good ole islamic times after they were being paid with petro dollars by the saudis so as to make islam more palatable and tame and compatible to the people of the west.
islamic empires existed. and sometime during their existence some arab and some persian and some iranin geniuses came along sporadically and left their mark. that happened.
golden age according to the normal convention it was meant to refer to ??? never.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2018-07-23 at 5:42 PM UTC
Originally posted by Lanny I'm not really sure what your point is here. Are you denying that the intellectual output we consider occurring during the islamic golden age was actually the result of some other group, or simply that it happened in spite of Islam and not because of it?
lol at lanny trying to be intellectual he doesn't even know what a non-sequitur is
