User Controls

Ireland repeals right to life of unborn

  1. #41
    NARCassist gollums fat coach
    9 whole months of being pregnant is a hell of an inconvenience as well. i mean what the fuck do these ungrateful fetus' expect?



    .
  2. #42
    NARCassist gollums fat coach
    plus no woman looks at all sexy when it looks like they've tied a fucking space hopper to their tits. i mean who the fuck would want to look at that in the newdey? let alone bang one.



    .
  3. #43
    tee hee hee Naturally Camouflaged [slangily complete this slumberer]
    Originally posted by NARCassist i mean what the fuck do these ungrateful fetus' expect?

    .

    Probably just a chance to make it out ALIVE!!!!
  4. #44
    Soyboy African Astronaut [relevantly rival my dehydroretinol]
    Sometimes I think we really do have a culture of death going on, just like the hardcore caths say. It's like having children is such a damper on alternately partying and being lonely that it's just not worthwhile. We leave that to the immigrants.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  5. #45
    NARCassist gollums fat coach
    Originally posted by tee hee hee Probably just a chance to make it out ALIVE!!!!

    some people just expect way too much.



    .
  6. #46
    tee hee hee Naturally Camouflaged [slangily complete this slumberer]
    Don't you mean, "some foetuses just expect way too much"?😯
  7. #47
    NARCassist gollums fat coach
    corr, some peoples kids huh? smh



    .
  8. #48
    Originally posted by Captain Carrying a baby to term is very physically taxing, difficult and potentially highly dangerous.

    Perhaps it will teach them to be more careful in the future
  9. #49
    Originally posted by Captain Carrying a baby to term is very physically taxing, difficult and potentially highly dangerous.

    Those first two aren’t really justifiable reasons to terminate a pregnancy.
  10. #50
    Originally posted by ohfralala Those first two aren’t really justifiable reasons to terminate a pregnancy.

    All those reasons are simultaneously present for carrying a baby to term. If you don't think the third unjustifiable, my point stands; it's dangerous as well as the other two things.
  11. #51
    Physically taxing and difficult do not always equate to highly dangerous. Those could just be basic annoyances. Highly dangerous could equate to life threatening.
  12. #52
    Originally posted by ohfralala Physically taxing and difficult do not always equate to highly dangerous. Those could just be basic annoyances. Highly dangerous could equate to life threatening.

    I didn't say that. Learn to read. I said all three reasons are present.

    Imagine you go to a shop and buy two goods, each worth $2. You present the shopkeeper with four $1 bills.

    Do you think the shopkeeper should deny you service because none of the $1 bills are individually enough to pay for the good?

    Any individual one not being adequate on its own doesn't matter when you have all three of them, and specially when at least one of those reasons alone makes it justified.

    It's like giving the shopkeeper a $5 bill and two $1s; the objection is invalid.
  13. #53
    Obviously if something is highly dangerous then all three reasons are present. Perhaps you should be a little less redundant and verbose. By listing the three separately and then stating the high risk was only a “potential” it seemed as though you were listing them as individual reasons and I wasn’t the only one that read it that way.
  14. #54
    Originally posted by ohfralala Obviously if something is highly dangerous then all three reasons are present

    That is literally not true, you fuckwit. How do you not understand this. All I am saying is that these three are not distinctly present, which they objectively can be< but in conjunction in the case of pregnancy.

    Something can easily be dangerous but not at all difficult or physically taxing. For example: putting a gun to your head and pulling the trigger. Takes next to no effort, is very dangerous.

    That is why I used my specific wording. And my point yet stands.
  15. #55
    Good pt Capt. I feel ya and understand what you are sayin. So you got a shut out in the making here.
  16. #56
    Originally posted by ifitdontfitacquit Good pt Capt. I feel ya and understand what you are sayin. So you got a shut out in the making here.

    Wot is ure avater from
  17. #57
    Originally posted by Captain Wot is ure avater from

    1981 Slasher called Nightmares in a Damaged Brain. Its one of my all time slashers/horrors.
  18. #58
    Originally posted by Captain That is literally not true, you fuckwit. How do you not understand this. All I am saying is that these three are not distinctly present, which they objectively can be< but in conjunction in the case of pregnancy.

    Something can easily be dangerous but not at all difficult or physically taxing. For example: putting a gun to your head and pulling the trigger. Takes next to no effort, is very dangerous.

    That is why I used my specific wording. And my point yet stands.

    It’s not my problem you worded it like a retard.

    “Potentially” means something has the capacity to develop in the future not that it will, making it somewhat mutually fucking exclusive from the other reasons you listed.

    There’s really no reason to get your panties in a twist just bc someone didn’t agree with your dumbass wording. Fucking suck a dick while writing a shitty dissertation on abortion.

  19. #59
    Originally posted by ifitdontfitacquit 1981 Slasher called Nightmares in a Damaged Brain. Its one of my all time slashers/horrors.

    Okay I'll watch it tonight
  20. #60
    Awesome.
Jump to Top