Originally posted by -SpectraL
Not necessarily. For example, the rabies vaccine can be 100% effective even after the person has contracted rabies.
there are a lot of technicalities in that. if a person contracts rabies without immediate treatment, and the symptoms start, they die, not counting some of the recent treatments that may or may not actually work.
the post-exposure 'vaccine' isnt technically a vaccine. meaning...a 'vaccine' is a weakened/dead sample of a specific infectious organism that is 'shown' to the human immune system, while not actually creating an infection, to 'teach' it how to kill the specific infectious organism in the eventuality the body get infected.
while there is an actual vaccine for rabies it only works before a person is exposed to the rabies virus.
if someone is exposed to the virus, then they not only have to get a vaccine, which doesnt do anything to help with the virus, it 'teaches' the immune system what to do then the immune system kills the infection, but they also get something that actively goes after the virus in the body to kill it, relieving the host immune system of some of the workload.
on a side note, ive been trying to find out details of this ebola vaccine and so far what im finding is its not entirely accurate to say its a true vaccine, in that the 'vaccine' has a genetically modified organism that isnt ebola, but the immune system doesnt know...or care...it still will 'learn' to kill ebola. so...now i have to figure out what this shit even is or how it works.
