2015-10-21 at 3:49 PM UTC
Sure, I'd even go so far as to say you'd be morally remiss if your chose not to rather than collecting the money and donating it towards something useful, although it would be understandable. You can save a lot of 5 year olds (and others) with a billion dollars.
2015-10-21 at 5:39 PM UTC
Sure, I'd even go so far as to say you'd be morally remiss if your chose not to rather than collecting the money and donating it towards something useful, although it would be understandable. You can save a lot of 5 year olds (and others) with a billion dollars.
Hmm, I wonder how many starving third world children I could save if I killed you, emptied your accounts and sold your possessions, then used the money to travel there and give direct aid in order to ensure maximum efficiency.
You know you're never going to give more than a small fraction to charity or state programs, which are horribly inefficient.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2015-10-21 at 8:40 PM UTC
Sophie, I just thought I should point out that the thread title is:
Would you shoot a 5-year old kid in the head for $1 BILLION
and not
Would you shoot in a 5-year old kid for $1 BILLION