User Controls
Are there any good arguments for antinatalism?
-
2018-04-07 at 9:26 PM UTCI'm familiar with the ecological argument, that humans inevitably cause irreparable harm to the environment and that it'd be better off without our influence. I'd like to see an ontological argument which successfully asserts that it's better from an egoistic perspective to simply not exist. But if we weren't here, who would make and use all the drugs?
-
2018-04-07 at 11:12 PM UTC*waits for Malice*
-
2018-04-07 at 11:22 PM UTCno it's a dumb proposition
-
2018-04-08 at 12:16 AM UTCI define the elimination of human suffering as my primary moral axiom. Suffering is inexorable so long as human life exists, therefore the only moral thing to do is deny our programming, stop reproducing, and walk hand in hand into extinction through mass suicide.
-
2018-04-08 at 12:17 AM UTC
Originally posted by inb4l0pht I define the elimination of human suffering as my primary moral axiom. Suffering is inexorable so long as human life exists, therefore the only moral thing to do is deny our programming, stop reproducing, and walk hand in hand into extinction through mass suicide.
Sounds awesome :D
You go first -
2018-04-08 at 12:19 AM UTC
Originally posted by inb4l0pht I define the elimination of human suffering as my primary moral axiom. Suffering is inexorable so long as human life exists, therefore the only moral thing to do is deny our programming, stop reproducing, and walk hand in hand into extinction through mass suicide.
You sound like a malfunctioning robot doctor from the future. Shouldn't your first cause in the present day be to bring about the engineering that will result in your creation? -
2018-04-08 at 12:23 AM UTC
-
2018-04-08 at 12:28 AM UTCWe will inevitably destroy the world through warfare if we continue the way we're going
The problem with antinatalism is, if the smart people stop reproducing, the stupid people will take over because the stupid people are too stupid to understand why not having children is a good idea and they're already out-breeding us by a pretty wide margin -
2018-04-08 at 12:32 AM UTC
-
2018-04-08 at 12:33 AM UTC
Originally posted by Juicebox We will inevitably destroy the world through warfare if we continue the way we're going
The problem with antinatalism is, if the smart people stop reproducing, the stupid people will take over because the stupid people are too stupid to understand why not having children is a good idea and they're already out-breeding us by a pretty wide margin
That’s already happening.
Antinatalism means EVERYONE stops reproducing. Not just smart people.
Although I guess only the smart people would choose to stop -
2018-04-08 at 1:05 AM UTC
-
2018-04-08 at 1:50 AM UTCyou