User Controls
beta beta male philosophy is dumb and fake
-
2018-02-15 at 1:43 AM UTC
Originally posted by Daily It is difficult for me to dispute that fucking another man, without their consent, is an objective metric of beta traits.
I say this because my best friend, who is a hard traditionalist as well as a pro MMA fighter, made the following point -
"I don't give a fuck how good your argument is. You can discredit all of my ideological and intellectual arguments. However, if I wanted to, I could double leg you, take your back, sink my hooks in, rear naked choke you, and whisper in your ear 'tell me I'm right'. And you fucking will, because if you don't, I will choke you the fuck out."
Physical prowess will always trump "muh arguments". It is true. It is objectively true. Theoretically, you could be completely correct, but practically, you have failed. You are done.
Thank you, Enter. I will be fucking faggots in the ass from this moment on.
gay people like the ones you see in today's youth have ruined homosexuality. i fucking LOVE homosexuality for what it stands for, but hate gay people.
they've turned the most beta domineering trait into fucking faggotry.
"YAY OMG! WE CAN GET MARRIED NOW!! WOOOO, EQUAL RITES!!!!!!!!!!!!"
Get lynched, faggots.
And this isn't me doing a bit -- I've had the same opinion on this for years. -
2018-02-15 at 1:48 AM UTC
-
2018-02-15 at 1:51 AM UTC
Originally posted by Daily It is difficult for me to dispute that fucking another man, without their consent, is an objective metric of beta traits.
I say this because my best friend, who is a hard traditionalist as well as a pro MMA fighter, made the following point -
"I don't give a fuck how good your argument is. You can discredit all of my ideological and intellectual arguments. However, if I wanted to, I could double leg you, take your back, sink my hooks in, rear naked choke you, and whisper in your ear 'tell me I'm right'. And you fucking will, because if you don't, I will choke you the fuck out."
Physical prowess will always trump "muh arguments". It is true. It is objectively true. Theoretically, you could be completely correct, but practically, you have failed. You are done.
Thank you, Enter. I will be fucking faggots in the ass from this moment on.
you have it all wrong. the idea with rectal violation is psychological...not physical. women literally cant be raped...their entire biological design is reproduction and any means to that end is what their biological design intended. the mental trauma caused my non-consensual sex is purely a societal-induced state of mind. despite what the judenkike media and #metoo movement tries to shovel, normal males consider a woman who has been raped 'damaged goods' (and i steal that quote) who is not to be considered an idea mate but a target for their own conquests and use.
in the case of males the violation of their orifice is psychologically more damaging than it would be for a woman, and the epitome of PTSD. that is the idea. in the case of a faggot their orifices cant be violated because that is what they enjoy. look at the highlighter-bandit as an example...that cock-fiend thrives on degradation. bending him over a pool table and gang-raping him would just give him a boner and future fap material. do the same with a normal hetero male and hes more likely to hari-kari himself on a pool stick than he is to get his asshole sutured back closed. -
2018-02-15 at 1:51 AM UTCEnter LOVES men being with men. Enter is in fact the gay nick we all knew it was all along. Enter confirmed homo.
-
2018-02-15 at 1:52 AM UTC
-
2018-02-15 at 1:52 AM UTC
-
2018-02-15 at 1:54 AM UTC
-
2018-02-15 at 1:56 AM UTC
-
2018-02-15 at 1:57 AM UTC
-
2018-02-15 at 2:01 AM UTC
Originally posted by infinityshock you have it all wrong. the idea with rectal violation is psychological…not physical. women literally cant be raped…their entire biological design is reproduction and any means to that end is what their biological design intended. the mental trauma caused my non-consensual sex is purely a societal-induced state of mind.
This is half right. Women do not simply enjoy rape - but it could be argued that women are more tolerant to being raped by a high status man with resources. If a low status man raped a woman, she would recoil with disgust and get PTSD. Otherwise she would get orgasm. -
2018-02-15 at 2:02 AM UTCThis is why women feel guilt and shame - because they get involuntary orgasms during rape. It's not their fault psychologically, it is a mere biological response women evolved in order to pair bond in the case that she gets inseminated.
-
2018-02-15 at 2:14 AM UTC
Originally posted by Daily This is why women feel guilt and shame - because they get involuntary orgasms during rape. It's not their fault psychologically, it is a mere biological response women evolved in order to pair bond in the case that she gets inseminated.
i know a chick (at the time she was in her 30s) who literally told me she was stranger-raped while walking in college, she had the best orgasm she ever had, and she feels guilt every time she has an orgasm because she associates it with rape.
she also had one of the most elaborate S&M fetishes of any chick ive known. i would have to wear a shirt for a week after banging her...and she'd bite anything that went near her mouth. she'd go out in public with revealing and see-through attire (ive posted pics before)... she would have unprotected sex with dudes knowing she was risking pregnancy and STDs. -
2018-02-15 at 2:19 AM UTC
Originally posted by infinityshock i know a chick (at the time she was in her 30s) who literally told me she was stranger-raped while walking in college, she had the best orgasm she ever had, and she feels guilt every time she has an orgasm because she associates it with rape.
she also had one of the most elaborate S&M fetishes of any chick ive known. i would have to wear a shirt for a week after banging her…and she'd bite anything that went near her mouth. she'd go out in public with revealing and see-through attire (ive posted pics before)… she would have unprotected sex with dudes knowing she was risking pregnancy and STDs.
Yes, this is all in line with evolutionary algorithms. The women who did not fight back against their rapist in prehistory simply got raped, inseminated and survived - therefore those genes which contributed to her receptiveness upon this environmental stimuli replicated and flourished. The women who fought back against their rapists/invading tribes usually got killed in the process, and therefore prevented the replication of the genes that would be aggressive in the face of a rapist. -
2018-02-15 at 2:26 AM UTC
Originally posted by Daily Yes, this is all in line with evolutionary algorithms. The women who did not fight back against their rapist in prehistory simply got raped, inseminated and survived - therefore those genes which contributed to her receptiveness upon this environmental stimuli replicated and flourished. The women who fought back against their rapists/invading tribes usually got killed in the process, and therefore prevented the replication of the genes that would be aggressive in the face of a rapist.
yep.
and this chick would have an orgasm in like...5 minutes or less. every other chick ive ever known takes 10...15...20 minutes or more. -
2018-02-15 at 2:29 AM UTC
Originally posted by stupid noob Fuck you I most certainly did not. Just because she can take a punch better than you, change a tire, and cut firewood doesn't make her a man, even if you yourself can't do any of those things you little pussy.
I must have mistaken her jelly roll for a dick. My apologies. -
2018-02-15 at 2:43 AM UTC
Originally posted by infinityshock yep.
and this chick would have an orgasm in like…5 minutes or less. every other chick ive ever known takes 10…15…20 minutes or more.
Yes, this is simply an involuntary physiological response in order to pair bond with the rapist, which her body expects to reproduce with. In modern times, which is full of cultural life hacks, the average woman "rationally" understands that non-consensual sex is an attack on her sexual strategy (choosing the best suitor for her offspring), but who's really gonna win here? 4 billion years of replicating organisms or a couple of thousand years of theoretical ideas? The average woman's genes that contribute to behavioural ecology and sexual strategy remain unchanged since before the agricultural revolution. -
2018-02-15 at 2:57 AM UTC
Originally posted by Daily Yes, this is simply an involuntary physiological response in order to pair bond with the rapist, which her body expects to reproduce with. In modern times, which is full of cultural life hacks, the average woman "rationally" understands that non-consensual sex is an attack on her sexual strategy (choosing the best suitor for her offspring), but who's really gonna win here? 4 billion years of replicating organisms or a couple of thousand years of theoretical ideas? The average woman's genes that contribute to behavioural ecology and sexual strategy remain unchanged since before the agricultural revolution.
exactly
jedis are responsible for this affront to nature. -
2018-02-15 at 3 AM UTC
-
2018-02-15 at 8:59 AM UTC
Originally posted by infinityshock the dick receiver is always the bottom
not necessarily ; we humans are on a higher order than animals becos of our ability to ''intend'' .... some say freewill but anyway ....
INTENT.
if a someone with a dick intended to put his dick in anothers asshole and got it despite being furiously and violently resisted, then hes the beta.
if however, a someone with dick wants to take a dick in his asshole and receiveth it despite furious and violent resistance ....
than he is the real beta.
there can be nothing more beta than a man who forcefully pins another man down, forcefully induce an errection in him before straddling over him and shrink wrapping his colon around the beta mans dick and manipulate it until the bottom bitch ejaculates.
NOTHING.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2018-02-15 at 9:10 AM UTC
