Oh, what's that, fag? You're a man of logic who needs "evidence" or "proof"?

1. 2018-01-08 at 1:23 AM UTC

   #61
   

   -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]

   Originally posted by Captain Falcon …I plug a 110v if into a 220v socket, it blows the fuck out…

   
   But you don't see that kind of failure in nature, only in human-made systems.
2. 2018-01-08 at 1:24 AM UTC

   #62
   The Self Taught Man Black Hole

   Originally posted by -SpectraL But you don't see that kind of failure in nature, only in human-made systems.

   
   What the fuck do you think cancer is, dawg. And humans are subsystems within the universe.
3. 2018-01-08 at 1:50 AM UTC

   #63
   

   -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]

   Originally posted by Captain Falcon What the fuck do you think cancer is, dawg. And humans are subsystems within the universe.

   
   Cancer is caused by human interference. It's not natural.
4. 2018-01-08 at 2 AM UTC

   #64
   The Self Taught Man Black Hole

   Originally posted by -SpectraL Cancer is caused by human interference. It's not natural.

   
   Objectively wrong.
5. 2018-01-08 at 2:01 AM UTC

   #65
   The Self Taught Man Black Hole
   And again, humans are simply subsystems of the closed system that is the universe. We are no more apart from nature than the ant and its colonies, or the bee and its hives.
6. 2018-01-08 at 2:07 AM UTC

   #66
   The Self Taught Man Black Hole

   Originally posted by -SpectraL Cancer is caused by human interference. It's not natural.

   
   
   
   

   Originally posted by Captain Falcon Objectively wrong.

   
   It's for population control
7. 2018-01-08 at 10:45 AM UTC

   #67
   

   benny vader YELLOW GHOST

   Originally posted by -SpectraL The purpose of it all is simply to enjoy watching creation enjoy itself. There's nothing else to it. Very basic and simple. It's like me asking you, what is the purpose of you listening to music. You listen to it simply because it causes you pleasure.

   
   no,
   
   life is suffering. for every one pleasure you get to slurp up you endured 10 sufferings to get to it.
8. 2018-01-08 at 12:35 PM UTC

   #68
   

   -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]

   Originally posted by benny vader no,
   
   life is suffering. for every one pleasure you get to slurp up you endured 10 sufferings to get to it.

   
   God didn't cause the suffering, man did.
   The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!

   • The Self Taught Man
9. 2018-01-08 at 12:58 PM UTC

   #69
   The Self Taught Man Black Hole
   I never knew how far gone spectral is mentally until reading this thread. Spectral is completely insane.
10. 2018-01-08 at 1:08 PM UTC

    #70
    The Self Taught Man Black Hole

    Originally posted by -SpectraL The purpose of it all is simply to enjoy watching creation enjoy itself. There's nothing else to it. Very basic and simple. It's like me asking you, what is the purpose of you listening to music. You listen to it simply because it causes you pleasure.

    
    And here I thought the purpose of life was to bitch about the mods
11. 2018-01-08 at 1:27 PM UTC

    #71
    

    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    I only bitch about staff when it's called for and justified. There hasn't been one single time where I bitched out a mod who didn't fully deserve it. Hey, they bring it on themselves. Don't blame me. Blame the chronic fuckups who put us all in that position.
12. 2018-01-08 at 1:35 PM UTC

    #72
    The Self Taught Man Black Hole

    Originally posted by -SpectraL I only bitch about staff when it's called for and justified.

    
    Lol
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!

    • Lanny
13. 2018-01-08 at 1:44 PM UTC

    #73
    

    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    The Probability Theory is total garbage, for this reason: imagine you bought a 500-piece piece puzzle at the store, brand new in the box, still wrapped in cellophane, and you shook the box once, opened it, and the puzzle managed to complete itself inside the box. What are the odds of that being true? Not only would the right pieces have to connect with one another, but they would have to be all facing the same side, and all the pieces would have to form a perfect square, and the picture itself would have to be correct. Well, you would say, you can't just do it on the first shake, obviously. So, you shake that box ten more times and open it. Has the odds of it being fully completed on any of those 10 shakes went down? Is it now fully complete? So you shake that box a million times this time, each time looking to see if it completed itself. What are the odds of success now? So you shake that box tetra-gazillion-billion times, each time checking to see if the puzzle is complete. After all those tries, what are the odds one of them would finally be a success? Answer? None. Because it would NEVER happen, no matter how many times you shake it. Now, imagine a million puzzle boxes, all shaking a tetra-gazillion-billion times. What are the odds of every single one of the million puzzle boxes completing itself on one of those shakes? Not just one, all of them. How long would it take? What are the odds? Now, you see that numbers can stretch so far out to be virtually uncountable. Infinity exists not only in numbers, but it actual events and happenings. That's how you know if something is possible or not, by examining the numbers, and in this case, the numbers are virtually infinite.
14. 2018-01-08 at 1:48 PM UTC

    #74
    The Self Taught Man Black Hole
    ITT: Spectral’s straw man arguments get destroyed and he replies with even more straw man arguments
15. 2018-01-08 at 1:54 PM UTC

    #75
    The Self Taught Man Black Hole

    Originally posted by -SpectraL The Probability Theory is total garbage, for this reason: imagine you bought a 500-piece piece puzzle at the store, brand new in the box, still wrapped in cellophane, and you shook the box once, opened it, and the puzzle managed to complete itself inside the box. What are the odds of that being true? Not only would the right pieces have to connect with one another, but they would have to be all facing the same side, and all the pieces would have to form a perfect square, and the picture itself would have to be correct. Well, you would say, you can't just do it on the first shake, obviously. So, you shake that box ten more times and open it. Has the odds of it being fully completed on any of those 10 shakes went down? Is it now fully complete? So you shake that box a million times this time, each time looking to see if it completed itself. What are the odds of success now? So you shake that box tetra-gazillion-billion times, each time checking to see if the puzzle is complete. After all those tries, what are the odds one of them would finally be a success? Answer? None. Because it would NEVER happen, no matter how many times you shake it. Now, imagine a million puzzle boxes, all shaking a tetra-gazillion-billion times. What are the odds of every single one of the million puzzle boxes completing itself on one of those shakes? Not just one, all of them. How long would it take? What are the odds? Now, you see that numbers can stretch so far out to be virtually uncountable. Infinity exists not only in numbers, but it actual events and happenings. That's how you know if something is possible or not, by examining the numbers, and in this case, the numbers are virtually infinite.

    
    the puzzle pieces can only connect with pressure, like against a bench or pushed together.
16. 2018-01-08 at 1:58 PM UTC

    #76
    

    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]

    Originally posted by Enter the puzzle pieces can only connect with pressure, like against a bench or pushed together.

    
    Well, say these puzzle pieces are able to fall into place.
17. 2018-01-08 at 1:59 PM UTC

    #77
    The Self Taught Man Black Hole

    Originally posted by -SpectraL Well, say these puzzle pieces are able to fall into place.

    
    How do you know that shaking it 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 times wouldn’t result in the puzzle eventually being solved? Do you have experimental data to back up this claim?
18. 2018-01-08 at 2:03 PM UTC

    #78
    

    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]

    Originally posted by Fox Paws How do you know that shaking it 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 times wouldn’t result in the puzzle eventually being solved? Do you have experimental data to back up this claim?

    
    Nobody could even calculate the question. That would be like trying to define Pi to the final decimal place. Sure it's possible, but the chances are so unattainable as to be virtually impossible.
19. 2018-01-08 at 2:13 PM UTC

    #79
    The Self Taught Man Black Hole
    if there are 5 puzzle pieces, shake the box. how many shakes will that take until they fall into place?
    
    times that by 100, for your 500-piece scenario.
    
    will that work? i have a feeling i'm missing out on something there.
20. 2018-01-08 at 2:35 PM UTC

    #80
    The Self Taught Man Black Hole

    Originally posted by -SpectraL Nobody could even calculate the question. That would be like trying to define Pi to the final decimal place. Sure it's possible, but the chances are so unattainable as to be virtually impossible.

    
    your an idiot