User Controls
Ajit Pai
-
2017-12-20 at 5:44 AM UTC
Originally posted by Lanny He's one of yours. I blame you captain father fucker. I blame you.
Pakistanis have been trying to nuke Indians off the face of the earth for decades, how the fuck is this nigger my fault? Maybe tell your government to stop sucking India's dick and help us wipe them out like the cockroaches they are. -
2017-12-20 at 5:48 AM UTCReal talk: What do Pakistanis think of Indians? On a personal level
-
2017-12-20 at 5:57 AM UTC
Originally posted by Captain Falcon Pakistanis have been trying to nuke Indians off the face of the earth for decades, how the fuck is this nigger my fault? Maybe tell your government to stop sucking India's dick and help us wipe them out like the cockroaches they are.
They still smell better than paki scum. -
2017-12-24 at 12:23 AM UTC
Originally posted by Lanny Didn't you just say what happened to stormfront "didn't matter" in the other net neutrality thread?
Stormfront and Daily Stormer are two separate projects. I don't think there's any overlap between the two at the seniour level.
I never liked Stormfront, and it seems like it has been irrelevant for a long time. Daily Stormer is a newer project (in reality it is more or less Andrew Anglin's blog, but he's on speed or something and produces a prodigious output), and is still quite relevant, with a growing user-base and headline articles in the Atlantic and other publications. -
2017-12-24 at 7:29 AM UTCOh, I assumed they were the same thing, like TDS is what they started calling themselves after a sufficient mourning period for Don Black's anal virginity had passed. It's kind of the same point though, the repeal of net neutrality laws makes that kind of bullying possible at the far more centralized minimal-compition level of ISPs. If you think godaddy did something wrong in the daily stormer affair then you should support net neutrallity legislation wholly.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2017-12-24 at 10:19 AM UTCTDS usually is taken to refer to The Daily Shoah, which is an influential podcast (around 100k downloads, but the memes from the show, like "standard fuck party" are all over the place) from therightstuff.biz, which is a whole different project, although there is a lot of interaction between the two.
The naming is obviously not thought out at all.
Post last edited by Issue313 at 2017-12-24T10:26:43.675694+00:00 -
2017-12-24 at 12:48 PM UTC
Originally posted by Lanny Oh, I assumed they were the same thing, like TDS is what they started calling themselves after a sufficient mourning period for Don Black's anal virginity had passed. It's kind of the same point though, the repeal of net neutrality laws makes that kind of bullying possible at the far more centralized minimal-compition level of ISPs. If you think godaddy did something wrong in the daily stormer affair then you should support net neutrallity legislation wholly.
So you support global government? -
2017-12-24 at 12:51 PM UTC
-
2017-12-24 at 12:53 PM UTC
-
2017-12-24 at 1:57 PM UTCNWO 4 lyfe dawg.
-
2017-12-24 at 2:24 PM UTCShut the fuck up, panthrass
-
2017-12-25 at 12:21 AM UTC
Originally posted by Speedy Parker If you support net neutrality you are supporting an NWO initiative.
Uhh, ok, that's cool you think that I guess.
I support net neutrality because it's a good thing on its own merits. Since I'm an adult capable of coming to my own conclusions I'm generally unconcerned with what other people or organizations, real or fictional, think about this particular policy point.
I'm interested though. Presumably you believe this "NWO" wields considerable political and monetary power. How exactly is it that such a powerful organization was incapable of preventing the repeal of net neutrality legislation? -
2017-12-25 at 12:44 AM UTC
Originally posted by Lanny I'm interested though. Presumably you believe this "NWO" wields considerable political and monetary power. How exactly is it that such a powerful organization was incapable of preventing the repeal of net neutrality legislation?
Are you saying that powerful people or interests never collude together, sometimes over hundreds of years, in order to bring about political goals, or that these collusions, or "conspiracies" are incapable of suffering setbacks? -
2017-12-25 at 5:30 AM UTC
Originally posted by Issue313 Are you saying that powerful people or interests never collude together, sometimes over hundreds of years, in order to bring about political goals, or that these collusions, or "conspiracies" are incapable of suffering setbacks?
No, nowhere did I say that. But if a setback happens there's typically a reason for it, and here I see none. So I'm asking for one.
It seems like if there's a single thing the "NWO" should be able to do, it would be to influence the decision of an unelected official on a highly contentious issue like net neutrality. Like what do you think happened here? Did the NWO just happen to sleep in on decision day?
If an organization supposedly has tremendous power, and an agenda to advance some policy, but fail to use said power to advance said policy point then it seems reasonable to doubt either the power of said organization or it's desire to push that policy. Euthyphro trilemma nigga, this shit is literally ancient. -
2017-12-25 at 6:08 AM UTC
Originally posted by Lanny if a setback happens there's typically a reason for it, and here I see none. So I'm asking for one.
Basically we're all just hiding in the bushes outside the house, looking in through the windows, and observing what's going on.
We seen the woman have a fight with the man, and the woman stormed out to the guest bedroom and clearly isn't sleeping with the man tonight.
Do we need to explain precisely why the fight occurred in order to note that the fight is happening? -
2017-12-25 at 7:09 AM UTC
-
2017-12-25 at 7:10 AM UTC
Originally posted by Issue313 Basically we're all just hiding in the bushes outside the house, looking in through the windows, and observing what's going on.
We seen the woman have a fight with the man, and the woman stormed out to the guest bedroom and clearly isn't sleeping with the man tonight.
Do we need to explain precisely why the fight occurred in order to note that the fight is happening?
if you dont plan to do anything about it ... no.
but if your to blame, or solve the peoblem ... then the answer is yeass. -
2017-12-25 at 7:17 AM UTC
Originally posted by Issue313 Basically we're all just hiding in the bushes outside the house, looking in through the windows, and observing what's going on.
We seen the woman have a fight with the man, and the woman stormed out to the guest bedroom and clearly isn't sleeping with the man tonight.
Do we need to explain precisely why the fight occurred in order to note that the fight is happening?
What? Is that an anology? If so the public would seem to be the pervy stalker dude. But what exactly do the man, woman, and not-having-sex represent? -
2017-12-25 at 7:17 AM UTCI think you might want to consider another avanue for making your point here
-
2017-12-25 at 2:26 PM UTC
Originally posted by Lanny Uhh, ok, that's cool you think that I guess.
Trump
I support net neutrality because it's a good thing on its own merits. Since I'm an adult capable of coming to my own conclusions I'm generally unconcerned with what other people or organizations, real or fictional, think about this particular policy point.
I'm interested though. Presumably you believe this "NWO" wields considerable political and monetary power. How exactly is it that such a powerful organization was incapable of preventing the repeal of net neutrality legislation?
