User Controls

This Just In! Net Neutrality is DEAD!

  1. #21
    Lanny Bird of Courage
    It's true I don't know much about you besides you having this weird habit of declaring what other people believe with no support and refusing to clarify your own position on anything. I don't really see how that relates though.
  2. #22
    Speedy Parker Black Hole
    Originally posted by Lanny It's true I don't know much about you besides you having this weird habit of declaring what other people believe with no support and refusing to clarify your own position on anything. I don't really see how that relates though.

    I don't declare a thing. I simply draw conclusions based on what people write.
  3. #23
    Lanny Bird of Courage
    Originally posted by Speedy Parker I don't declare a thing. I simply draw conclusions based on what people write.

    When you state your "conclusions" (which are wrong, btw) publicly sans whatever line of reasoning led to them, well that seems a lot like declaration to me.
  4. #24
    Speedy Parker Black Hole
    Originally posted by Lanny When you state your "conclusions" (which are wrong, btw) publicly sans whatever line of reasoning led to them, well that seems a lot like declaration to me.

    Which conclusion are you referring to? Or were you talking about all of them? Also since according to you I have refused to clarify my own position on anything how could you possibly know what my conclusions are in order to judge them to be wrong.
  5. #25
    Lanny Bird of Courage
    Originally posted by Speedy Parker Which conclusion are you referring to?

    This one seems like a prime example:

    Originally posted by Speedy Parker If we follow your vision we would all be slaves. I would rather live free in anarchy than in chains of world corporate slavery.

    I'd like to hear more about how you arrived that this little, uhh, conclusion of yours
  6. #26
    Speedy Parker Black Hole
    Originally posted by Lanny This one seems like a prime example:



    I'd like to hear more about how you arrived that this little, uhh, conclusion of yours

    Based on the politicians you have expressed support for and their hidden agendas my statement about your vision of the world and where it would take us is 100% balls on accurate.
  7. #27
    Lanny Bird of Courage
    Please enumerate the politicians I have expressed support for.
  8. #28
    mmQ Lisa Turtle
    George Washington
    Nancy Pelosi
    Jesse Ventura
  9. #29
    Sophie Pedophile Tech Support
    Originally posted by Lanny Please enumerate the politicians I have expressed support for.

    I don't think you ever have stated which politicians you support. Unless like, you count Stalin as a politician. But jokes aside Speedy Parker is clearly biased. But that doesn't make you less of a commie. But that is probably the only thing i dislike about you, or at least a thing that we disagree on. Politics that is. Besides that you're pretty trill ass nigga'.

    Also Parker, i think you're assuming Lanny supports certain politicians based on the fact that he's a lefty. Lanny isn't your regular old lefty though. That said. Sieg Heil and carry on.
  10. #30
    Speedy Parker Black Hole
    Originally posted by Lanny Please enumerate the politicians I have expressed support for.

    You know and I know. That's good enough for me.
  11. #31
    Lanny Bird of Courage
    Originally posted by Sophie I don't think you ever have stated which politicians you support. Unless like, you count Stalin as a politician. But jokes aside Speedy Parker is clearly biased. But that doesn't make you less of a commie. But that is probably the only thing i dislike about you, or at least a thing that we disagree on. Politics that is. Besides that you're pretty trill ass nigga'.

    Yee, and I think that's a great contrast with the attitudes we've seen from Dargo and Speedy here. We disagree on many political issues but we treat each other positions more or less seriously, ideas to argue with as opposed to being tribalistic targets of ridicule. Importantly we can look at some issues, like say net neutrality, and agree that it's a good thing despite arriving at that conclusion from oppositional initial positions. This is a quality lacking in oh so much of debate these days, as demonstrated by Dargo's "people I don't like like it, so I have to hate it" attitude.
  12. #32
    Lanny Bird of Courage
    Originally posted by Speedy Parker You know and I know. That's good enough for me.

    This is what we call back pedaling.
  13. #33
    mmQ Lisa Turtle
    Originally posted by Speedy Parker You know and I know. That's good enough for me.

    Google translate said this meant 'I dunno'
  14. #34
    benny vader YELLOW GHOST
    Originally posted by Issue313 This guy is onto something.

    Next step: Disney to buy Comcast for x billion dollars.

    Enjoy downloading your torrents at 52kbps you r0dents.

    youll also have to wait for the buffer to fill up while watching RT but not faux news, not becos RTs russian propaganda .... but becos faux news belongs to ....

    youll also be denied services if they detected the presence of adblockers.
  15. #35
    D4NG0 motherfucker
    Originally posted by Lanny You see this right wingers? This right here is the just deserts of partisan politics and vilification of opposition we got to enjoy for months in the runup to the 2016 election. A person who can only form opinions in opposition to their chosen boogieman ("lefties"). This is our everyman. Enjoy your impending mad max lifestyles, you fucking earned it.

    I just don't give a shit about this particular issue. Tell me more about identity politics and hate speech.
  16. #36
    Lanny Bird of Courage
    Originally posted by D4NG0 I just don't give a shit about this particular issue.

    Why? Because you think free (as in freedom) access to the internet is unimportant or because you don't really know about the issue?

    Tell me more about identity politics and hate speech.

    Why are you asking me? They're issues you get riled up about, not me. This will probably surprise you, but many liberals including myself consider hate speech a non-issue from the legislative point of view, the cases requiring state intervention falling under assassination or conspiracy laws. I'm happy to talk to you about "identity politics" but I want you to tell me what you think that terms means first.
  17. #37
    Speedy Parker Black Hole
    Originally posted by Lanny Why? Because you think free (as in freedom) access to the internet is unimportant or because you don't really know about the issue?



    Why are you asking me? They're issues you get riled up about, not me. This will probably surprise you, but many liberals including myself consider hate speech a non-issue from the legislative point of view, the cases requiring state intervention falling under assassination or conspiracy laws. I'm happy to talk to you about "identity politics" but I want you to tell me what you think that terms means first.

    Arguing about Net Neutrality in this forum is sort of like cows arguing about whether the farmer or the grocer should make more money on the milk.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  18. #38
    D4NG0 motherfucker
    Originally posted by Lanny Why are you asking me? They're issues you get riled up about, not me. This will probably surprise you, but many liberals including myself consider hate speech a non-issue from the legislative point of view, the cases requiring state intervention falling under assassination or conspiracy laws. I'm happy to talk to you about "identity politics" but I want you to tell me what you think that terms means first.

    You made a sweeping generalization that I blindly support everything the right does, so I did the same in return. I simply do not care about net neutrality, as I fail to see how it's relevant, so I'm cool with just going against lefties. If you want to explain more about net neutrality, I'm open to listening.

    This may shock you, but sometimes people, especially those with lives, rightly use political parties to guide their opinions because they don't have time to read up on every fucking issue that pops up in the news.
  19. #39
    mmQ Lisa Turtle
    Originally posted by D4NG0 This may shock you, but sometimes people, especially those with lives, rightly use political parties to guide their opinions because they don't have time to read up on every fucking issue that pops up in the news.

    That isn't shocking. That's lazy, ignorant, convenient, and embarrassing.

    "I can't be bothered to form my own opinion, but since I INSIST on having to have an opinion on everything, I agree with whatever those dudes agree with, of which I have absolutely no clue what that is."
  20. #40
    D4NG0 motherfucker
    Originally posted by mmQ That isn't shocking. That's lazy, ignorant, convenient, and embarrassing.

    "I can't be bothered to form my own opinion, but since I INSIST on having to have an opinion on everything, I agree with whatever those dudes agree with, of which I have absolutely no clue what that is."

    Don't be retarded. Why is it that people don't understand moderation anymore?
Jump to Top