User Controls
Any catholics?
-
2016-02-18 at 12:47 PM UTCA lot of people here seem to have been raised Catholic.
Proof I needed that most post like victims of sex abuse.
-
2016-02-18 at 1:13 PM UTCIf I ever have kids they are going to catholic school. Lying to children is the best way to teach them.
-
2016-02-18 at 1:47 PM UTC
If I ever have kids they are going to catholic school. Lying to children is the best way to teach them.
Good on ya!
This forum needs future posters and when your kids are sexually abused they will be on here posting away. -
2016-02-18 at 1:59 PM UTCI actually have a 3 year old daughter and her mom is literally legally retarded and meets all her boyfriends online and uses her aspie fetal alcohol money to bring felons to her parents house and let's them hold the child. Also I should mention there are no black people where I live so this girl BRINGS ONE HERE and I saw the guy apply at 7-11 one day when I was walking home and I just looked at those two losers and thought "wow what a shitty life they will always have". This is also when I first started smoking meth and she came up to Me and asked if I could give her boyfriends resume to my boss and I just said "sorry I'm gonna go smoke meth in the public bathroom I'm too busy" and just walked away. Fuck females they are all retarded whores ( at least where I live).
If I lived in the city and not povertyville USA I could probably find a speed freak chick to bounce around with . there are stoner girls and coke bitches here but I haven't turned anyone onto crystal meth YET
-
2016-02-18 at 2:52 PM UTC
What are your thoughts on Catholicism roshamploo? This is your thread after all, why don't you enlighten us as to your views and opinions as it relates to Catholicism? Please, spare us no details. Feel free to type out many pages worth of your analysis.
I've been catholic ever since I was baptized, went to church every sunday for years up until I was like 14, Made my first communion, went to Sunday school/CCD on my own accord from age 5 until age 13/14. confirmation, and still occasionally go to church. The whole experience is really good since I actually believe in god. My church is one of those roman catholic ones where they sing the hymns in latin or something, but really church, sacremental wine and the body of christ and the whole thing is just getting all the weight of my sins off my back.
Also note to sharpie and sophie:
find God. Your lives will be so much better -
2016-02-18 at 3:02 PM UTCIt's honestly very pathetic reading some of you guys try to justify your faith in a religion that you clearly don't even understand or honor in even the most basic sense.
"Extrinsic Religious Orientation is a method of using religion to achieve non-religious goals, essentially viewing religion as a means to an end. It is used by people who go to religious gatherings and claim certain religious ideologies to establish or maintain social networks while minimally adhering to the teachings of the religion. People high in external religious orientation are more likely to conform to social norms and demands rather than what the religion requires, and are often prone to twist religious beliefs to serve their own political goals. Gordon Allport stated that people high in external religious orientation use religion, “to provide security and solace, sociability and distraction, status and self-justification†(Allport &Ross, 1967, p. 434). (Whitley & Kite, 2010)"
-
2016-02-18 at 6:59 PM UTCEverything you have posted in this thread just shows that you are bitter against the Church. Rather than combatting my arguments you just called me ignorant and bragged about how exposed you are to philosophy and said that my claims about my own beliefs are dubious (even though in my first post I made it clear what my beliefs are). I think you are smart and also a pretty cool guy but your arguments arent nearly as good as you think they are since they basically devolved into you berating the opposition. Arguing with you was fun but once you stop combating the points made and start being hostile against the person people are not gonna wanna talk to you.
-
2016-02-18 at 7:28 PM UTC
Everything you have posted in this thread just shows that you are bitter against the Church. Rather than combatting my arguments you just called me ignorant and bragged about how exposed you are to philosophy and said that my claims about my own beliefs are dubious (even though in my first post I made it clear what my beliefs are). I think you are smart and also a pretty cool guy but your arguments arent nearly as good as you think they are since they basically devolved into you berating the opposition. Arguing with you was fun but once you stop combating the points made and start being hostile against the person people are not gonna wanna talk to you.
If you really feel that way then you didn't read the post then or understand it. I literally put up first hand sources demonstrating what you claimed was bullshit. I also give examples of each fallacy you made.
I'm not bitter against the church at all and actually occasionally go to Orthodox churches because the liturgy is beautiful. I just have a low tolerance for bullshit I refuse to apologize for. -
2016-02-18 at 7:56 PM UTC
If you really feel that way then you didn't read the post then or understand it.
Your argument is literally "If you dont feel what I feel you are stupid". You say that I was high horsing you but you are doing it yourself buddy. -
2016-02-18 at 8:25 PM UTC
Your argument is literally "If you dont feel what I feel you are stupid". You say that I was high horsing you but you are doing it yourself buddy.
No, it isn't. Most of these "opinions" are contradictions of objective fact that (believe it or not) your feelings have nothing to do with. I just refuse to have patience for what is either at this point dishonesty or stupidity.
Your claims...The church did not bring about charges of heresy or whatever to Galilleo for presenting his theory of heliocentricity. Their dispute with him was largely academic and were actually based on the fact that his theory was not proven by the standards the courts held.
How you say that theology is inconsistent seems to jut show your own ignorance on the matter of consistency in either church.
To say that the work of a scientist requires no faith is incorrect. They must have faith that all the science that came before them is sound. They must have faith in their instruments. They must have faith in the valid workings of their own mind and most importantly they must have faith in the scientific method even though the method itself requires that whatever is undertaken in that method not be taken in faith.
Modern scientific methods are just that, methods of science. Faith is not a method of science for good reason but that is not to say that the scientist is still not surrounded by faith in one sense or another.
The most recent instances of persecution of belief is found to be against those of faith such as jedis in Germany or Christians in Russia.
the crusades were a response to hundreds of years of muslim invasion and barbary.
...Are demonstrably, factually, 100%, not debatable, bullshit which I provided primary sources for. Most of the other things you introduced were fallacies, which I each addressed individually and gave the Latin names for. Granted, while I made a point to tell you that this illustrates pretty clearly you don't know what you're talking about, to reduce my entire argument to that single observation is pretty disingenuous on your part and further proves my point.
If you're so convinced that I'm just a narcissist who is dismissing your arguments, you could respond to each them with evidence instead of just replying to what's basically a page and a half essay addressing each point with "well easy is just an asshole who thinks he's smarter than me because I disagree with him and it shows how immature he is." I don't have to respect your opinions when they're basic contradictions of fact. Sorry but "The Catholic church didn't bring Galileo on charges of heresy" isn't just thinking differently - it's objectively incorrect and there's no evidence that the spent the rest of his life any other way than under house arrest. Saying that "the history of church theology is consistent and you're ignorant if you think otherwise" isn't a matter of opinion when there's literally over 35,000 different major denominations of Christianity alone and these churches specifically in question are marked with Schisms, Reformations, disagreements about what's even canonical scripture, and literally wars over doctrine.
I also don't have to be nice about it because it's really cringey and pathetic watching you try to justify thousands of years of persecution and abuse on behalf of the church with claims that obviously lies to anyone who even googled them. Again, freedom of speech doesn't mean that your ignorance is equal to the knowledge of somebody else. -
2016-02-18 at 8:52 PM UTC
I just refuse to have patience for what is either at this point dishonesty or stupidity.
Boy are you gonna feel stupid when you realize what website you are posting on. -
2016-02-18 at 8:55 PM UTC
Boy are you gonna feel stupid when you realize what website you are posting on.
topkek
