User Controls
The Retarded Thread: Click Here for AIDS
-
2017-09-06 at 4:15 AM UTCYour posts are becoming more literate. Don't let mash change you. He just doesn't understand what it is to be AWSUM.
-
2017-09-06 at 4:19 AM UTCThe track listings on that CD are hilarious.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2017-09-06 at 4:20 AM UTC
-
2017-09-06 at 4:21 AM UTC
-
2017-09-06 at 4:31 AM UTCJust bought six-hundred 25mg dph for less than seven dollars. Not a bad deal. Just over a dollar per hundred. You're lucky to get a hundred pills for ten bucks at the store.
-
2017-09-06 at 4:33 AM UTCIt was like four dollars and change for a bottle of one hundred at my local Kroger. Still have quite a few, got them like a month ago. Been taking a couple most nights.
-
2017-09-06 at 4:34 AM UTCthat was some juicy drama I missed. Did hydro actually kill herself?
-
2017-09-06 at 4:37 AM UTCNah.
-
2017-09-06 at 4:42 AM UTC
-
2017-09-06 at 4:43 AM UTC
Originally posted by matrix yeah so thats why its called the uncertainty principle right? because its not something inherent
Argumentum Ad Nomine, that's a new oneyou actually just recited a common misconception about the uncertainty principle you fucking idiot
https://www.nature.com/news/quantum-uncertainty-not-all-in-the-measurement-1.11394
Are you actually illiterate? Did you read your own link?the uncertainty principle still stands, says Steinberg: “In the end, there's no way you can know [both quantum states] accurately at the same time.” But the experiment shows that the act of measurement isn't always what causes the uncertainty. “If there's already a lot of uncertainty in the system, then there doesn't need to be any noise from the measurement at all,” he says.
The uncertainty principle simply refers to the accuracy with which it is possible to measure either variable in relation to the other. Whether or not the uncertainty is caused by the measurement or not is not relevant to the principle of the fact. The fact remains (as it always has) that a given particle both has a definite spin and position. Both these values exist. It is simply impossible to mathematically describe both simultaneously. Neither values are spontaneously pulled out of your asshole.
This is completely separate from any discussion of indeterminism. -
2017-09-06 at 4:46 AM UTCHow does one become so severely autistic they can't understand something as simple as the uncertainty principle? Sploo is King Retard.
-
2017-09-06 at 4:50 AM UTC
-
2017-09-06 at 4:50 AM UTC
Originally posted by matrix the uncertainty principle is inherent to the particle, not just measurement
If by "measurement", you are describing some dude holding up a meter rule to a pendulum then you are correct. This is a very reasonable idea for a fucktard. But for anyone with half a brain, it doesn't need to be explained that measurement refers to how ultimately a system can be modelled/described.the uncertainty principle implies a random conjugate pair
The uncertainty principle implies no such thing. You have inserted the word "random" because you are mentally subnormal. Conjugacy has absolutely no relationship to randomness.the uncertainty principle implies inherent randomness to the particle
The uncertainty principle implies no such thing.the universe is made out particles
Also wrong, but I'm not going to expect you to understand field theory.randomness of particles contradicts determinism
Of course it does. I've argued with Lanny on this point.
But you cannot seem to get it through your thick skill that the uncertainty principle is 100% unrelated to the subject whatsoever. There is literally zero connection between the uncertainty principle and indeterminism.the uncertainty principle contradicts determinism
The uncertainty principle does no such thing.do you understand yet dumbass?
I understand that you are mentally retarded. -
2017-09-06 at 4:54 AM UTC
-
2017-09-06 at 4:56 AM UTCWatching reality shows is for women and queers.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2017-09-06 at 4:57 AM UTC
-
2017-09-06 at 5:15 AM UTCCan only watch reality shows if I'm really high
-
2017-09-06 at 7:06 AM UTCDon't even try, sploo's IQ is provably too low to ever understand even the rudiments of physics.
-
2017-09-06 at 7:11 AM UTCGODS I WAS IQ THEN
-
2017-09-06 at 9:11 AM UTCif
Originally posted by Captain Falcon If by "measurement", you are describing some dude holding up a meter rule to a pendulum then you are correct. This is a very reasonable idea for a fucktard. But for anyone with half a brain, it doesn't need to be explained that measurement refers to how ultimately a system can be modelled/described.
The uncertainty principle implies no such thing. You have inserted the word "random" because you are mentally subnormal. Conjugacy has absolutely no relationship to randomness.
The uncertainty principle implies no such thing.
Also wrong, but I'm not going to expect you to understand field theory.
Of course it does. I've argued with Lanny on this point.
But you cannot seem to get it through your thick skill that the uncertainty principle is 100% unrelated to the subject whatsoever. There is literally zero connection between the uncertainty principle and indeterminism.
The uncertainty principle does no such thing.
I understand that you are mentally retarded.
Originally posted by Captain Falcon If by "measurement", you are describing some dude holding up a meter rule to a pendulum then you are correct. This is a very reasonable idea for a fucktard. But for anyone with half a brain, it doesn't need to be explained that measurement refers to how ultimately a system can be modelled/described.
The uncertainty principle implies no such thing. You have inserted the word "random" because you are mentally subnormal. Conjugacy has absolutely no relationship to randomness.
The uncertainty principle implies no such thing.
Also wrong, but I'm not going to expect you to understand field theory.
Of course it does. I've argued with Lanny on this point.
But you cannot seem to get it through your thick skill that the uncertainty principle is 100% unrelated to the subject whatsoever. There is literally zero connection between the uncertainty principle and indeterminism.
The uncertainty principle does no such thing.
I understand that you are mentally retarded.
if one measurement doesnt imply the other measurement, how does momentum imply position and vice versa? derpadew is u
