User Controls
I Cant See Underneath My Tits.
-
2017-09-05 at 7:29 PM UTC
-
2017-09-05 at 7:30 PM UTC
-
2017-09-05 at 7:30 PM UTC
-
2017-09-05 at 8:21 PM UTC
-
2017-09-05 at 8:22 PM UTC
-
2017-09-05 at 8:55 PM UTC
-
2017-09-05 at 9:51 PM UTC
Originally posted by NARCassist the united nations ranks them 33 for GDP out of 211 countries. they beat denmark and the phillipines despite having only half the population. and the phillipines is hardly 3rd world either.
1] GDP is a shitty way to measure population wealth and wellbeing. its a measure of how much worth of goods are being produced .... irregardless of what they are and who made them .... or which entity sold them.
GDI(income) of 1000/month could mean everybody in the population of a thousand is making a thousand dollars / month or it could mean a gold mine owner with nine hundred and ninety nine slaves making a million dollars a month.
and
2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Developing_country#List_of_developing_economies_according_to_UNDP
my case, it rested. -
2017-09-05 at 9:54 PM UTCand if the phillipines isnt a 3rd world countries .... it wouldnt be a major child sex destination.
-
2017-09-05 at 10 PM UTC
Criticism of the term "developing country"
This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (March 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
There is some criticism of the use of the term "developing country". The term implies inferiority of a "developing country" or "undeveloped country" compared with a "developed country", which many countries dislike. It is criticized for being too positive and too negative.
It assumes a desire to "develop" along the traditional Western model of economic development, which a few countries, such as Cuba and Bhutan, choose not to follow.[4]
The concept of "development" rests on the assumption that Modernization theory holds. Modernization theory, as the dominant development theory of the late 19th and 20th centuries, has largely contributed to the definition of "development". In short, it argues that there is only one way to achieve "modernity" and "development" - that of "Western" nation-states. Largely challenged today, modernization theory still holds an important role in defining "development".
The term "developing" implies mobility and does not acknowledge that development may be in decline or static in some countries, particularly in southern African states worst affected by HIV/AIDS. In such cases, the term "developing country" may be considered a euphemism. The term implies homogeneity between such countries, which vary widely. The term also implies homogeneity within such countries when wealth (and health) of the most and least affluent groups varies widely. Similarly, the term "developed country" incorrectly implies a lack of continuing economic development/growth in more-developed countries.
In general, development entails a modern infrastructure (both physical and institutional), and a move away from low value added sectors such as agriculture and natural resource extraction. Developed countries, in comparison, usually have economic systems based on continuous, self-sustaining economic growth in the tertiary sector of the economy and quaternary sector of the economy and high material standards of living. However, there are notable exceptions, as some countries considered developed have a significant component of primary industries in their national economies, e.g., Norway, Canada, Australia. The USA and Western Europe have a very important agricultural sector, and are major players in international agricultural markets. Also, natural resource extraction can be a very profitable industry (high value added), e.g., oil extraction.
An alternative measurement that has been suggested is that of gross national happiness, measuring the actual satisfaction of people as opposed to how fiscally wealthy a country is.
During the late 20th century, and with the advance of World-systems theory, the notions of "developed country" and "developing country" have started to slowly be replaced by the less-controversial, trade-based, notions of "core country", "semi-periphery country" and "periphery country". The terms of "developing countries" and "developed countries", although obsolete, still continue to be dominant, as part of the official narrative.
you can stfu now
. -
2017-09-05 at 10:01 PM UTCbtw, if you want the link for that^ then check your own post above
. -
2017-09-05 at 10:20 PM UTC
Originally posted by NARCassist btw, if you want the link for that^ then check your own post above
i did.
we all know that the term ''developing countries'' is an euphemism for 3rd world countries just as ''african american'' is euphemism for niggers.
and as such ... as defined by IMF what is and is not ''developing countries'' .... or a prettier term the now use ... ''emerging economies''
https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2015/01/weodata/groups.htm#oem
unless your better informed than IMF i'll go with them and their classification. -
2017-09-05 at 10:49 PM UTCi think we prolly got different ideas on what 3rd world means. to me its a country that lacks infrastructure, reliable and affordable healthcare, access to clean water, shit like that. places like afganistan for example where most people live on a par with europe 500 years ago. places where the vast majority of the country live in extreme poverty and prolly don't even have access to electricity. south africa has infrastructure, it has thriving cities where they have clean water. they have pretty good healthcare altho i can't comment on its affordability by all citizens. they have a good tourism economy and altho they might not completely compare to europe and the US, they are hardly afganistan.
.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2017-09-06 at 4:36 PM UTCPeople who bitch about poverty in the US make me laugh.
-
2017-09-06 at 6:07 PM UTCInfinity shock I'm ruling you out as an attention whore like this? Why would you make a thread like this when you know that everyone's going to make fun of you
-
2017-09-06 at 8:06 PM UTC
Originally posted by NARCassist i think we prolly got different ideas on what 3rd world means. to me its a country that lacks infrastructure, reliable and affordable healthcare, access to clean water, shit like that. places like afganistan for example where most people live on a par with europe 500 years ago. places where the vast majority of the country live in extreme poverty and prolly don't even have access to electricity. south africa has infrastructure, it has thriving cities where they have clean water. they have pretty good healthcare altho i can't comment on its affordability by all citizens. they have a good tourism economy and altho they might not completely compare to europe and the US, they are hardly afganistan.
the definition of 3rd world is exactly like how infinity shock would define nigger : if their not white, their nigger.
if their not a 1st world country, thier 3rd world country.
and then theres the question of ratio. how much red should there be in a white shirt before it becomes a red shirt ????? -
2017-09-06 at 8:59 PM UTC51%.
-
2017-09-06 at 9:03 PM UTC
-
2017-09-06 at 9:14 PM UTCNo. Exactly 51%.
-
2017-09-06 at 9:18 PM UTC
-
2017-09-06 at 9:28 PM UTC
