User Controls

I'm so fucking mad right now.

  1. #41
    "I work for tips, you know."

    That made me laugh.
  2. #42
    Lol affluenza rage
  3. #43
    Sophie Pedophile Tech Support
    [size=7]REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE[/size]
  4. #44
    Sophie Pedophile Tech Support
    I typed pink but this is objectively salmon, that, or i am colorblind.
  5. #45
    I typed pink but this is objectively salmon, that, or i am colorblind.
    Brain cancer. It's a golfball-sized tumor right behind your left eye.
  6. #46
    I typed pink but this is objectively salmon, that, or i am colorblind.

    No, you are correct. It is "salmon".

    Do you know what color people use to describe the meat of salmon?
  7. #47
    New rule: When I have the last post on a page the thread is over.
  8. #48
    *LOCKED*
  9. #49
    No, you are correct. It is "salmon".

    Do you know what color people use to describe the meat of salmon?
    Penis. Is it penis?
  10. #50
    EasyDoesIt Tuskegee Airman
    Lol affluenza rage

    Under8ed post
  11. #51
    Sophie Pedophile Tech Support
    No, you are correct. It is "salmon".

    Do you know what color people use to describe the meat of salmon?

    Probably pink. Even so, IRL salmon looks a bit orange and actual pink has more red in it.
  12. #52
    Lanny Bird of Courage
    *Gasp* Hrmph.

    It's not necessarily a matter of independence, more of having taken social isolation to an extreme. I wonder how much of some of the great works depended on external input, how much was just the product of them being holed off reading and thinking alone.

    We don't really reason independently except when taking social isolation to an extreme. What I mean by that is most of normal human reasoning is done for the sake of convincing someone else of something, not for coming to true conclusions. But that's OK, if we all do this it at least approximates a marketplace of ideas. This is why we have things like anchoring biases, all of our tendencies to deviate from formal reasoning. We're "designed"(evolved) to think about things as groups, to take positions and hang on to them well after we should change our mind, because it empirically turns out "clash of ideals" is a better survival paradigm than Cartesian "think about things carefully while sitting by a fire not doing much else". It's kinda fascinating really, we've evolved traits that transcend genes, like we have group traits, species level behaviours now. In a meaningful way there exist "organisms" or organic self-sustaining systems that are composed of multiple human consciousnesses.
  13. #53
    EasyDoesIt Tuskegee Airman
    We don't really reason independently except when taking social isolation to an extreme. What I mean by that is most of normal human reasoning is done for the sake of convincing someone else of something, not for coming to true conclusions. But that's OK, if we all do this it at least approximates a marketplace of ideas. This is why we have things like anchoring biases, all of our tendencies to deviate from formal reasoning. We're "designed"(evolved) to think about things as groups, to take positions and hang on to them well after we should change our mind, because it empirically turns out "clash of ideals" is a better survival paradigm than Cartesian "think about things carefully while sitting by a fire not doing much else". It's kinda fascinating really, we've evolved traits that transcend genes, like we have group traits, species level behaviours now. In a meaningful way there exist "organisms" or organic self-sustaining systems that are composed of multiple human consciousnesses.

    Which is awesome until we destroy the environment / die in nuclear war because people are busy letting Bill O'Rielly interpret news for them.
Jump to Top