User Controls
Weeeeel gonts, looks I'm back again.
-
2017-08-09 at 6:15 AM UTC
Originally posted by LegalizeSpiritualDiscovery He said the blast. Think you're talking about the fallout, while he was talking about the actual explosion.
I didn't compare the blast to a nuclear reactor at all; because there's no actual explosion it wouldn't make sense to do so.
I was only talking about the fallout and that the timelapse maps after Chernobyl are the best demonstration of how radioactive fallout will spread and kill far more than the primary explosions. -
2017-08-09 at 6:27 AM UTCbut that's like measuring the temperature in your room and comparing the effect of the temp increase produced from a cup of coffee to the increase produced from the radiator. the radiator is permanently radiating energy where as the coffee radiates energy for the time it takes to cool which is pretty quickly. once the coffee has released all its energy it is no longer releasing any more, yet the energy that was released will still be effecting the room for a while. the radiator does not stop releasing energy and the energy released also affects the room temperature for a while, while even more energy continues to be released affecting the temperature on top of that energy that has already been released.
. -
2017-08-09 at 6:30 AM UTC
Originally posted by aldra I didn't compare the blast to a nuclear reactor at all; because there's no actual explosion it wouldn't make sense to do so.
I was only talking about the fallout and that the timelapse maps after Chernobyl are the best demonstration of how radioactive fallout will spread and kill far more than the primary explosions.
i would personally be a bit sceptical of those maps. who produced them? why did they produce them? what message are they trying to promote? would be the first questions i would ask.
. -
2017-08-09 at 6:36 AM UTC
Originally posted by NARCassist but that's like measuring …
Again, completely irrelevant:
Originally posted by aldra I was only talking about the fallout and that the timelapse maps after Chernobyl are the best demonstration of how radioactive fallout will spread and kill far more than the primary explosions.
was essentially just to demonstrate how far radiation will spread.
On that topic though, I believe a nuclear weapon and a leaking reactor expel pretty similar total levels of radioactive material, just a bomb disperses it all at once (though I can't seem to find any decent information on a comparison) -
2017-08-09 at 6:53 AM UTCbut radiation is everywhere anyway. we wouldn't exist without it, the universe wouldn't exist without it. propaganda has gotten everyone living in fear of it.
again i'm not saying that a nuclear blast isn't devastating. just that people do think its a lot more powerful and destructive than it really is. many tests were conducted in the nevada dessert just 30/40 miles from vegas. how is vegas managing with all that fallout?
. -
2017-08-09 at 6:57 AM UTCseems i was a little out on the distance, but a hundred bombs were detonated above ground just 65 miles from vegas. another 828 were detonated there below ground.
Nevada Test Site
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Nevada National Security Site[1] (N2S2),[2](though the abbreviation NNSS is still used), previously the Nevada Test Site (NTS), is a United States Department of Energy reservation located in southeastern Nye County, Nevada, about 65 miles (105 km) northwest of the city of Las Vegas. Formerly known as the Nevada Proving Grounds, the site was established on 11 January 1951 for the testing of nuclear devices, covering approximately 1,360 square miles (3,500 km2) of desert and mountainous terrain. Nuclear weapons testing at the Nevada Test Site began with a 1-kiloton-of-TNT (4.2 TJ) bomb dropped on Frenchman Flat on 27 January 1951. Many of the iconic images of the nuclear era come from the NTS.
During the 1950s, the mushroom clouds from the 100 atmospheric tests could be seen for almost 100 mi (160 km). The city of Las Vegas experienced noticeable seismic effects, and the distant mushroom clouds, which could be seen from the downtown hotels, became tourist attractions. St. George, Utah, received the brunt of the fallout of above-ground nuclear testing in the Yucca Flats/Nevada Test Site. Winds routinely carried the fallout of these tests directly through St. George and southern Utah. Marked increases in cancers, such as leukemia, lymphoma, thyroid cancer, breast cancer, melanoma, bone cancer, brain tumors, and gastrointestinal tract cancers, were reported from the mid-1950s through 1980.[3][4] The vast majority—828 of the 928 total nuclear tests—were underground.
. -
2017-08-09 at 7 AM UTCVegas is a shithole of degeneracy. That's like saying Japan is fine despite being nuked twice. Have you seen their porn? Their game shows turn into porn, and their porn turns into game shows. Tentacles. Used panty vending machines. 30-year-old virgins. Blurred-out vaginas. A severe lack of white people. Anime. Gundams. Chinpokomon. Godzilla. Lotus flowers. Fukushima. Girls squealing obnoxiously when fucked. Exploding boob commercials. Bullet trains. Nippon sounds like nipple.
-
2017-08-09 at 7:03 AM UTCi think japan looks awesome, i would love to go. especially to hear those hot jap chicks squeal as i go balls deep.
. -
2017-08-09 at 7:05 AM UTCNot sure, I'd expect that there's at least some background radiation and maybe a higher incidence of birth defects, but I'm at work and I think I've reached the end of my ability to concentrate so I'll look deeper into it another time.
When I was reading about nuclear fallout earlier, something that came up was that the isotopes' half-lives could not accurately predict how long dangerous levels of radiation would persist - mostly environmental factors caused them to disperse and deplete at a faster rate. As a result, while it's often feared that nuclear bomb sites would stay radioactive for 60 years or longer, in a practical sense the area could be safe enough to pass through within a year and they could be liveable within 5.
Again it really depends on the design of the bomb though - how much radioactive fuel was used, what type (a deuterium shell for example) it is, etc. - so it's hard to predict much about fallout at all. -
2017-08-09 at 7:35 AM UTCin the late 80s i got the SAS survival handbook and know a lot about this from reading the nuclear fallout section. i just found it online for you guys to check out. its very interesting.
-
2017-08-09 at 1:19 PM UTC
Originally posted by aldra why would an advanced race bother with cave paintings?
further, if we nuclear-holocausted ourselves, the majority of the planet would die from secondary radiation exposure and extreme temperatures, not primary explosions - there would still be buildings left standing all over the world
In our modern age, we still have civilizations which are completely cut off from the rest of the world. Compared to the rest of the world, they are like cavemen. They still wear furs, cook on open fires, carry spears, and don't speak any known languages. Just because there are cave prehistoric paintings does not mean the entire world at that time was without more advanced technology. And it wasn't a nuclear holocaust which wiped out the pre-Flood population, it was the 9th planet, Nibiru, which caused a pole shift, the oceans to rise out of their basins, and the water canopy (which covered the entire Earth at that time) to fall onto the planet. -
2017-08-09 at 3:58 PM UTCyour lucky i didnt see this one earlier due to Bill Krozby thread.
anyway ...
Originally posted by -SpectraL They have millions of years worth of modern technological advancements.
Originally posted by -SpectraL The government has captured and examined and reverse engineered
can you see how retarded that sounds .... visitors from millions years old advanced civilization succumbing to a bunch of primitive apes civilization a few millennia old ???? -
2017-08-09 at 4:03 PM UTC
-
2017-08-09 at 4:39 PM UTC
Originally posted by benny vader your lucky i didnt see this one earlier due to Bill Krozby thread.
anyway …
can you see how retarded that sounds …. visitors from millions years old advanced civilization succumbing to a bunch of primitive apes civilization a few millennia old ????
No technology is 100% reliable, even in the most advanced of civilizations. Several of their ships crashed, and that's how us primitive humans were able to capture it. If it not for those failures, we would never have been able to capture their devices. -
2017-08-09 at 4:53 PM UTCWhy do you talk about shit like this as if you know all the answers with a certainty? I'm interested in some of this stuff, but it's not logical to act like out of all of human history and billions of people, you know the answers for sure 100%. Even some of the atypical beliefs I have about our history, I realize I don't know for certain. I just think certain things are possible and we don't know one way or the other, but it's silly to pretend you for sure know the answers when that's literally not possible.
-
2017-08-09 at 5:04 PM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL No technology is 100% reliable, even in the most advanced of civilizations. Several of their ships crashed, and that's how us primitive humans were able to capture it. If it not for those failures, we would never have been able to capture their devices.
high tech space ships dont crash. they have advanced technology to prevent that with 100% reliability. -
2017-08-09 at 5:16 PM UTC
-
2017-08-09 at 5:35 PM UTC
-
2017-08-09 at 5:38 PM UTC
-
2017-08-09 at 5:46 PM UTC
