User Controls
The Retarded Thread: Click Here for AIDS
-
2017-07-26 at 12:29 AM UTC
Originally posted by Zankwest None of those claims are even remotely based in reality. You are living a delusion pal.
I'm posting the REAL faggot list tonight, it took about 0.01% of my brain processing power to troll the fuck out of this forum and break it.
I also had the help of skiddie software and I could not have done it without the CCCrew, bling bling, Kinkou, HTS, actor and meth.
Bill Krozby refused to help me in any way, I just wanted to make that public. The one guy I thought I could count on the most.
Didn't read -
2017-07-26 at 12:42 AM UTCTell me what you know about Tesla, Malice.
-
2017-07-26 at 12:58 AM UTC
-
2017-07-26 at 1:17 AM UTC
Originally posted by RisiR † Tell me what you know about Tesla, Malice.
He had a fascinating and incredibly abnormal brain and mind.
It really is a shame that he, or someone astoundingly analogous to himself, wasn't born in our modern era and studied by neuroscientists. The findings and their implications would have been remarkable.
I suppose ultimately that's it. I don't exactly care about his life per se, although of course his remarkable achievement and elucidation of various aspects of the workings of his mind are what made this revelatory, it's his neurological makeup that matters to me, the crucial deviations.
I don't have a normal perception of others or even myself in general, though. Due to the problems of identity and consciousness, other factors, limitations, no one truly has a fully concrete or coherent sense of themselves, and this will sound strange due to the immensely egotistical and repetitive, consistent, presentation of myself I may produce via writing here, but I likely have an abnormally low sense of identity and individuality. Even stranger is that my sense of being separate from the environment is far weaker, when you would expect the inverse. In some forms it may be, but I doubt I've properly identified them or could explain what they are, albeit it isn't something I've given much effort to. It could primarily be a sense of detachment, where the profound view of separateness, of isolation and alienation, is mostly conceptual. As in, my body doesn't feel distinctly different from the environment or others, and I view others as similarly indistinct in a manner, but more as part of an underlying process that isn't naturally dwelled on at a conscious level. Like a cog that would be willing to blow up the entirety of the rest of the machine in order to survive, if only for a chance to determine whether there is any reason to survive. -
2017-07-26 at 1:20 AM UTC
Originally posted by Malice He had a fascinating and incredibly abnormal brain and mind.
It really is a shame that he, or someone astoundingly analogous to himself, wasn't born in our modern era and studied by neuroscientists. The findings and their implications would have been remarkable.
I suppose ultimately that's it. I don't exactly care about his life per se, although of course his remarkable achievement and elucidation of various aspects of the workings of his mind are what made this revelatory, it's his neurological makeup that matters to me, the crucial deviations.
I don't have a normal perception of others or even myself in general, though. Due to the problems of identity and consciousness, other factors, limitations, no one truly has a fully concrete or coherent sense of themselves, and this will sound strange due to the immensely egotistical and repetitive, consistent, presentation of myself I may produce via writing here, but I likely have an abnormally low sense of identity and individuality. Even stranger is that my sense of being separate from the environment is far weaker, when you would expect the inverse. In some forms it may be, but I doubt I've properly identified them or could explain what they are, albeit it isn't something I've given much effort to. It could primarily be a sense of detachment, where the profound view of separateness, of isolation and alienation, is mostly conceptual. As in, my body doesn't feel distinctly different from the environment or others, and I view others as similarly indistinct in a manner, but more as part of an underlying process that isn't naturally dwelled on at a conscious level. Like a cog that would be willing to blow up the entirety of the rest of the machine in order to survive, if only for a chance to determine whether there is any reason to survive.
Didn't read. LOL. -
2017-07-26 at 1:24 AM UTC"Tell me what you know about Tesla, Malice."
Originally posted by Malice I don't have a normal perception of others or even myself in general, though. Due to the problems of identity and consciousness, other factors, limitations, no one truly has a fully concrete or coherent sense of themselves, and this will sound strange due to the immensely egotistical and repetitive, consistent, presentation of myself I may produce via writing here, but I likely have an abnormally low sense of identity and individuality. Even stranger is that my sense of being separate from the environment is far weaker, when you would expect the inverse. In some forms it may be, but I doubt I've properly identified them or could explain what they are, albeit it isn't something I've given much effort to. It could primarily be a sense of detachment, where the profound view of separateness, of isolation and alienation, is mostly conceptual. As in, my body doesn't feel distinctly different from the environment or others, and I view others as similarly indistinct in a manner, but more as part of an underlying process that isn't naturally dwelled on at a conscious level. Like a cog that would be willing to blow up the entirety of the rest of the machine in order to survive, if only for a chance to determine whether there is any reason to survive.
-
2017-07-26 at 1:24 AM UTCI actually suspected this before, and particularly just as I was about to click on new posts.
You see what a wonderful data processing machine my brain is? Shame it drains all the joy and wonder out of life. There's hardly any novelty left. Well, I suppose aside from the world of the interpersonal, which I've neglected to an unimaginable extent.
RisiR, how do you think I would react after my first time having sex? How would it affect my life henceforth? It's at least a good opportunity for a joke. -
2017-07-26 at 1:25 AM UTCI'M CONFUSED AND REALLY LOUD!!!
-
2017-07-26 at 1:25 AM UTC
-
2017-07-26 at 1:26 AM UTC
Originally posted by Malice I actually suspected this before, and particularly just as I was about to click on new posts.
You see what a wonderful data processing machine my brain is? Shame it drains all the joy and wonder out of life. There's hardly any novelty left. Well, I suppose aside from the world of the interpersonal, which I've neglected to an unimaginable extent.
RisiR, how do you think I would react after my first time having sex? How would it affect my life henceforth? It's at least a good opportunity for a joke.
Bamboozled. Also, didn't read. -
2017-07-26 at 1:37 AM UTC
Originally posted by Malice RisiR, how do you think I would react after my first time having sex? How would it affect my life henceforth? It's at least a good opportunity for a joke.
Depends on the situation. If you plan on skipping all the steps that are involved in getting laid and just get a hooker that rubs your clit, you'd probably take that as an excuse to keep dwelling in your delusion that you were always right. You'd probably still get your clit rubbed every now and then, though.
If you actually got a girl to fuck you for free, you would have most likely changed to a point were I couldn't predict your reaction based on my current views of you.
I don't think you should drop the hassle and emotional part, though. You should have sex with a partner, not a hook up. -
2017-07-26 at 2:03 AM UTCS.F. Enferprises has an account with some post history available for $2. (not this one)
-
2017-07-26 at 2:11 AM UTCThank god you understand, as I would have predicted, jesting aside, or at least would have hoped. Horrible nuisance to be told that simply "getting laid"/buying a hooker would make a radical positive difference in my life.
I can't accurately predict what would occur either, which is part of what makes it so horrifying, unnerving, and dangerous. Relative to who I am and have been my entire life it really would be like stepping into a new world and becoming a new person. Becoming mired in samsara and practically becoming a normie in critical aspects of my being a life would be a living nightmare, regardless of how happy/neurologically drugged I feel.
No, no. Ultimately love is just another emotion and there's nothing special about it. The evolutionary dynamics and implications are clear. Still, this is a limited human vessel, and in a way it's like attempting to withstand the force of a hurricane in an emaciated body. Certainly not a process that will rapidly, let alone immediately, be contained and overcome.
I have the thought that the ideal love would be to develop yourself to the point where you receive everything you wanted from it, fully grasp that feeling, what love is, and apply it to the world around you, to all sentient beings at least, and move forward.
"What do you want out of love?"
"I want to no longer need you. To be able to leave and never look back."
It would be profoundly depressing for almost anyone to be in a relationship with someone who explicitly states this as their aim, and actually seriously strives for it. The odds of finding someone compatible are almost nil. I suppose the optimal place to look would be amongst adherents of particular forms of Buddhism, remarkably strong and learned adherents, in a manner, yet not to the level where they've attained a state where true happiness-peace and celibacy are possible. Yes, i could certainly see a person with congruent goals and understanding existing, yet exceedingly rare. Always possible you could bring the right person to an understanding, make them your muse, if you identify the capacity within them.
Unfortunately it's far more likely to end up unable to find anyone, to repeatedly experience that you're incompatible with others.
Have you ever personally met anyone who would be interested or willing to take part in the weird fucking ideas and projects I have in mind? Terribly unlikely, particularly among women in their 20s. Well, then again, there are exceedingly strange people in the world, who tend to cluster in high ranking universities. *shrugs* I don't hold any hopes, profound disillusionment would by far be the most likely outcome. -
2017-07-26 at 2:31 AM UTC
Originally posted by Malice Thank god you understand, as I would have predicted, jesting aside, or at least would have hoped. Horrible nuisance to be told that simply "getting laid"/buying a hooker would make a radical positive difference in my life.
I can't accurately predict what would occur either, which is part of what makes it so horrifying, unnerving, and dangerous. Relative to who I am and have been my entire life it really would be like stepping into a new world and becoming a new person. Becoming mired in samsara and practically becoming a normie in critical aspects of my being a life would be a living nightmare, regardless of how happy/neurologically drugged I feel.
No, no. Ultimately love is just another emotion and there's nothing special about it. The evolutionary dynamics and implications are clear. Still, this is a limited human vessel, and in a way it's like attempting to withstand the force of a hurricane in an emaciated body. Certainly not a process that will rapidly, let alone immediately, be contained and overcome.
I have the thought that the ideal love would be to develop yourself to the point where you receive everything you wanted from it, fully grasp that feeling, what love is, and apply it to the world around you, to all sentient beings at least, and move forward.
"What do you want out of love?"
"I want to no longer need you. To be able to leave and never look back."
It would be profoundly depressing for almost anyone to be in a relationship with someone who explicitly states this as their aim, and actually seriously strives for it. The odds of finding someone compatible are almost nil. I suppose the optimal place to look would be amongst adherents of particular forms of Buddhism, remarkably strong and learned adherents, in a manner, yet not to the level where they've attained a state where true happiness-peace and celibacy are possible. Yes, i could certainly see a person with congruent goals and understanding existing, yet exceedingly rare. Always possible you could bring the right person to an understanding, make them your muse, if you identify the capacity within them.
Unfortunately it's far more likely to end up unable to find anyone, to repeatedly experience that you're incompatible with others.
Have you ever personally met anyone who would be interested or willing to take part in the weird fucking ideas and projects I have in mind? Terribly unlikely, particularly among women in their 20s. Well, then again, there are exceedingly strange people in the world, who tend to cluster in high ranking universities. *shrugs* I don't hold any hopes, profound disillusionment would by far be the most likely outcome.
Absolutely didn't read. -
2017-07-26 at 2:33 AM UTC
-
2017-07-26 at 2:34 AM UTC"Human life is a logistical nightmare."
According to google I am the first to produce this specific aphorism. I want credit for it.
No, but really, this is genuinely how I feel about my own personal life and something that repeatedly torments me. The complexity is just excruciatingly uncopable (Why the hell isn't this a word?). -
2017-07-26 at 2:36 AM UTCAre you familiar with Boyd Rice, malice?
-
2017-07-26 at 2:39 AM UTC
Originally posted by Malice "Human life is a logistical nightmare."
According to google I am the first to produce this specific aphorism. I want credit for it.
No, but really, this is genuinely how I feel about my own personal life and something that repeatedly torments me. The complexity is just excruciatingly uncopable (Why the hell isn't this a word?).
Didn't read -
2017-07-26 at 5:39 AM UTCOh dear god, something led me to r/incels and I decided to check the top links for the month just for my amusement.
Apparently a fucking gang member who went viral online for his mugshot is now living in a mansion, driving a luxury sports car, and may even be involved with the heiress of some company: https://www.reddit.com/r/Incels/comments/6l3cv9/upvote_if_you_hate_this_cunt/?sort=confidence&st=j5khzwsu&sh=7ef959f1
https://www.thesun.co.uk/tvandshowbiz/3408090/jeremy-meeks-chloe-green-wife-melissa-worlds-hottest-felon-topshop/
What is there to say? Have a laugh and shout the slogan "Annihilate the human race!"? Or at least the masses/low quality people.
No need to drag on and engage in deeper analysis. By this age it's become so trite/banal. Something that constantly occurs in various forms and is only good for a short lived chortle. -
2017-07-26 at 5:57 AM UTCI mean, he went from that to this, and most amusing of all, he's literally dating a fucking billionaire's daughter.
What does this say about women? About modern capitalist-crass-consumerist society and the culture of the masses?
I can only imagine how her poor father feels, although given that he's in the fashion industry there's a high chance that he's a degenerate himself. What kind of people devote their lives to that atrocious facet of society?
And a such a large fraction of the population, particularly women, obsess and waste countless hours over frivolous nonsense such as this. Ludicrous. Why on earth is a mass culling so controversial and not called for by elites? If I was in a secure enough position where they were unable to ruin me I would regularly espouse such aims and finance organizations that aligned with thus.
Post last edited by Malice at 2017-07-26T06:00:23.002942+00:00
