User Controls
having lots of kids = free food forever
-
2017-07-23 at 11:20 AM UTCYaasss fam slay
-
2017-07-23 at 11:38 AM UTCErrr... what happens after you eat the last kid?The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2017-07-23 at 2:46 PM UTC
-
2017-07-23 at 3:34 PM UTC
-
2017-07-23 at 3:47 PM UTC
-
2017-07-23 at 3:58 PM UTCghetto lobster...
-
2017-07-23 at 4:33 PM UTC
Originally posted by NARCassist the trick is to have another kid before you finish the last. for best results you really need to try and keep at least 3 kids ahead at all times, in case of emergency. having twins is obviously very beneficial.
.
Makes sense. I suppose having a good freezer and a ton of ziplock bags is also important. -
2017-07-23 at 4:37 PM UTCNo one has factored in that the kids might catch on and instead they themselves might try to eat their parents.
-
2017-07-23 at 4:40 PM UTCThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2017-07-23 at 5:13 PM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL Makes sense. I suppose having a good freezer and a ton of ziplock bags is also important.
no...the key is the organizational lattice showing how to space out births between multiple wives along with rates of growth of the spawns then coincide that with the required daily coloric consumption of the household to determine to appropriate birthrate.
this provides a constant supply of fresh meat without the need for having to preserve unconsumed calories. -
2017-07-23 at 5:15 PM UTC
Originally posted by mmQ No one has factored in that the kids might catch on and instead they themselves might try to eat their parents.
you don't let them get that old, retard. everyone knows the meat is tender-est the younger it is.
hell...the birthing mother should be squatting right over the stove to squeeze that sprog out right into the pot. straight from the birth canal fresh... -
2017-07-23 at 5:29 PM UTC
Originally posted by infinityshock no…the key is the organizational lattice showing how to space out births between multiple wives along with rates of growth of the spawns then coincide that with the required daily coloric consumption of the household to determine to appropriate birthrate.
this provides a constant supply of fresh meat without the need for having to preserve unconsumed calories.
Would you allow the odd one through, if they demonstrated any superior skills or especially impressive talents? -
2017-07-23 at 6:37 PM UTC
Originally posted by infinityshock you don't let them get that old, retard. everyone knows the meat is tender-est the younger it is.
hell…the birthing mother should be squatting right over the stove to squeeze that sprog out right into the pot. straight from the birth canal fresh…
Why would you want a minimal amount of babby meat when you can let it age and get so much more? Eating them as babbies is horribly inefficient. -
2017-07-23 at 6:51 PM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL Would you allow the odd one through, if they demonstrated any superior skills or especially impressive talents?
of course not...thats another mouth to feed. sufficient breeding stock takes too long to grow to maturity and is too expensive in resources.
besides...there wouldnt be time to discover such abnormalities if the breeding bitches are doing their jobs properly and popping out those buns directly into the stew pot. -
2017-07-23 at 6:55 PM UTC
-
2017-07-23 at 7:03 PM UTC
Originally posted by mmQ Why would you want a minimal amount of babby meat when you can let it age and get so much more? Eating them as babbies is horribly inefficient.
false.
humans are not designed by nature as a food source, which is why there are no predatory animals existing that intentionally prey upon humans as a primary food source. the ratio of consumable tissue to inedible tissue is exponential in the wrong direction in humans in comparison to something like a cow or deer with massive ratios of edible to inedible tissue, with edible tissue being the larger part of the ratio. look at specifically-bred human food sources such as cornish-cross chickens, swine, or new-zealand-white rabbits...or domesticated cows...their edible tissue to inedible tissue ratios are astronomical.
the longer a human lives, the smaller its edible tissue ratio grows in comparison to its inedible tissue.
in addition there is another equation to factor in: that is the comparison of available nutrition content of the consumed food source in relation to the nutrition content that food source required to achieve its ideal harvesting size.
rabbits and cows do not compete with humans for their primary food sources while chickens and swine are omnivores to the point they will not only consume food sources that dont conflict with human needs...but will consume human waste products. cows are very inefficient in their harvest-weight nutrition availability in relation to the nutrition requirements to get to that size. new-zealand-white rabbits and cornish-cross chickens are at the opposite end of the spectrum in that their nutrition requirements to achieve ideal harvest size is less than the nutritional value they provide to their human consumers. -
2017-07-23 at 7:04 PM UTC
-
2017-07-23 at 7:08 PM UTC
-
2017-07-23 at 7:45 PM UTC
Originally posted by mmQ No one has factored in that the kids might catch on and instead they themselves might try to eat their parents.
no, you take each one aside separately and say 'you're my favorite, we'll never eat you. you, me and your mom will just eat all the others. but don't ever tell them'.
. -
2017-07-23 at 7:48 PM UTCThe older the meat gets, the more tainted it is.
