Originally posted by Kafka
Checking how long I can hold my breath for. I started to feel a pressure in my forehead. I think maybe I could hold longer if I took a different type of breath before starting.
Man you and Malice wouldve had a time.
Its too bad i dont know what ither sites he was on. Feeding all his posts into chatGPT could probably create a MalBot.
Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
Funny to hear literal tyrannical Marxist crazies coin terms such as "the dangers of the political lens". Laughable and sad.
I just realised that I thought you were trolling this whole time, but now I'm not sure. It seems like anyone can become a crazy MAGA supporter.
Originally posted by Kafka
I just realised that I thought you were trolling this whole time, but now I'm not sure. It seems like anyone can become a crazy MAGA supporter.
You're the one supporting a serial child sniffer who doesn't know where he is.
Originally posted by Kafka
I just realised that I thought you were trolling this whole time, but now I'm not sure. It seems like anyone can become a crazy MAGA supporter.
Perhaps, but it takes a special moron to believe the shit you do.
Don’t bother responding if you don’t watch this video all the way to the end. If this chit doesn’t change your mind about the shady-ass DemoCRAPs & the Pelosi/Schummer DemoDUMP Party… you are nothing but an idiot!
"If Donald Trump or any future U.S. president were to take office again, they would not have the unilateral power to seize an individual's assets, including those of Elon Musk, without following legal processes. Asset seizures by the government typically happen under specific circumstances, such as:
1. **Criminal Activity**: If a person is involved in criminal activity, the government can seize their assets through legal means, such as forfeiture laws. However, there must be solid evidence, legal proceedings, and a court decision. The president cannot do this on his own.
2. **National Security or Executive Orders**: A president might issue an executive order that could impact an individual's business or assets if the person or company is seen as a national security threat. This is rare and would still require legal justification. For example, the U.S. has sanctioned foreign companies and individuals due to security concerns, but doing so to a U.S. citizen like Elon Musk without cause would be highly controversial and legally challenged.
3. **Congressional Action**: In extreme cases, Congress could pass laws that target certain business activities or industries, but this would require legislative approval and is subject to judicial review.
Any attempt to seize Musk's assets would likely face immense legal challenges and would require a legitimate and lawful reason. Without clear legal grounds, such a move would likely be seen as an abuse of presidential power."
Originally posted by Kafka
"If Donald Trump or any future U.S. president were to take office again, they would not have the unilateral power to seize an individual's assets, including those of Elon Musk, without following legal processes. Asset seizures by the government typically happen under specific circumstances, such as:
1. **Criminal Activity**: If a person is involved in criminal activity, the government can seize their assets through legal means, such as forfeiture laws. However, there must be solid evidence, legal proceedings, and a court decision. The president cannot do this on his own.
2. **National Security or Executive Orders**: A president might issue an executive order that could impact an individual's business or assets if the person or company is seen as a national security threat. This is rare and would still require legal justification. For example, the U.S. has sanctioned foreign companies and individuals due to security concerns, but doing so to a U.S. citizen like Elon Musk without cause would be highly controversial and legally challenged.
3. **Congressional Action**: In extreme cases, Congress could pass laws that target certain business activities or industries, but this would require legislative approval and is subject to judicial review.
Any attempt to seize Musk's assets would likely face immense legal challenges and would require a legitimate and lawful reason. Without clear legal grounds, such a move would likely be seen as an abuse of presidential power."
The left wing fascists had no problem going after Trump and friends on completely bogus "grounds".