User Controls
Global Surface Temperatures Are Rising Faster Now Than At Any Time In The Past 485 Million Years
-
2024-10-03 at 5:04 AM UTC
Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ This so-called "Pope" is just another One World Order lackey. He's a total sellout, who now has his scripts and walking papers in hand. He's a clown. A real life clown.
his climate message seems a bit different than what states or fake corporate initiatives push with their green new deal and corrupt big gov/oil chock hold. I think it's pretty evident that their non profit NGO's are actually struggling and have almost no support from anyone. An honest message isn't what people want to hear, they mostly just want to moral self license and pay more taxes to politicians in hopes of solving the problem. Mind you places like China or developing countries will have coal burning plants for the next 100 years and there will probably be a cycle of dirty in the long term
which is why we need fusion and nuclear and the pope would agree -
2024-10-03 at 5:08 AM UTCThe problem with nuclear power is nuclear weapons proliferation.
The technology needed to generate energy from fissile material can be easily converted into a nuclear payload.
You'd need a very robust and intrusive oversight system in place to prevent that.
This is the most significant barrier to the widespread adoption of nuclear power. -
2024-10-03 at 5:14 AM UTC
Originally posted by Gridlocke The problem with nuclear power is nuclear weapons proliferation.
The technology needed to generate energy from fissile material can be easily converted into a nuclear payload.
You'd need a very robust and intrusive oversight system in place to prevent that.
This is the most significant barrier to the widespread adoption of nuclear power.
No it's not, that's not an issue at all and the IAEA already exists and doesn't need government entities to function, and in fact functions better without them as 99% of nuclear disasters are caused by governments cutting corners for non profit based incentives -
2024-10-03 at 5:20 AM UTCI feel like you're trolling but I'll bite. IAEA has no enforcement power and relies entirely on governmental cooperation. There's nothing stopping member states from just lying or denying access.
-
2024-10-03 at 5:41 AM UTC
Originally posted by Gridlocke I feel like you're trolling but I'll bite. IAEA has no enforcement power and relies entirely on governmental cooperation. There's nothing stopping member states from just lying or denying access.
Governments and militaries yes, but commercial and industrial entities have no reason to lie to risk decades of building up trust when they have an extremely safe technology. The nuclear supply chain has never had a safety issue ever except when states are involved. Nuclear proliferation benefits energy and mining industries, technology development, it has nothing to do with government misuse of technology. -
2024-10-03 at 5:58 AM UTC
Originally posted by the man who put it in my hood Governments and militaries yes, but commercial and industrial entities have no reason to lie to risk decades of building up trust when they have an extremely safe technology. The nuclear supply chain has never had a safety issue ever except when states are involved. Nuclear proliferation benefits energy and mining industries, technology development, it has nothing to do with government misuse of technology.
They would if a hostile actor has infiltrated that entity and are using their position to embezzle fissile material and sell it to North Korea.
It hasn't really been a problem yet because nuclear has always been a very niche market. If it becomes the dominant source of energy then the risk of abuse scales with it.
These civilian/commercial programs always require government approval and they might be less inclined to approve them if it opens up various national security risks. That's why it's still a barrier even if the risks can be mitigated, why do it when you can just keep burning coal instead? -
2024-10-03 at 7:41 AM UTC
-
2024-10-03 at 11:29 AM UTC
-
2024-10-03 at 1:31 PM UTCAny time man makes a technological breakthrough, their first thought isn't how it can help mankind, it's how it can be used to attack mankind to further control them.
-
2024-10-03 at 1:55 PM UTC
-
2024-10-03 at 2:35 PM UTC
Originally posted by Gridlocke They would if a hostile actor has infiltrated that entity and are using their position to embezzle fissile material and sell it to North Korea.
It hasn't really been a problem yet because nuclear has always been a very niche market. If it becomes the dominant source of energy then the risk of abuse scales with it.
These civilian/commercial programs always require government approval and they might be less inclined to approve them if it opens up various national security risks. That's why it's still a barrier even if the risks can be mitigated, why do it when you can just keep burning coal instead?
North Korea has never had a nuclear accident and has a flawless safety record compared to the USA. Maybe they should be allowed to have nukes and everyone else should just learn to live with it. -
2024-10-03 at 2:58 PM UTC
-
2024-10-03 at 3:05 PM UTC
-
2024-10-03 at 3:59 PM UTC
-
2024-10-03 at 6:16 PM UTC
-
2024-10-03 at 6:17 PM UTC
-
2024-10-03 at 6:58 PM UTC
-
2024-10-03 at 7:43 PM UTC
-
2024-10-03 at 8:30 PM UTC
-
2024-10-03 at 9:53 PM UTC
